I wish more TV brands would copy Samsung's 2024 strategy

Samsung QE65S95D QD-OLED TV
(Image credit: What Hi-Fi?)

Samsung is the first to launch its 2024 TV range, and it's already enjoying success. It's covering all its bases this year, with new OLED and Neo QLED (Samsung's branding term for Micro LED-equipped TVs), and so far it's looking good. After a slightly wobbly year in 2023 with the impressive but flawed S95C, Samsung has come back strong with the S95D. It's also followed up on the five-star QN95C, and while we haven't released our full review of the QN95D yet, we like what we've seen so far.

While the TVs themselves look particularly promising this year, I want to take a step back to look at Samsung's TV lineup. It's a unique approach that I don't see any other brand replicating, and I really wish they would. To break down to its simplest form, Samsung is offering equivalent models throughout its range, but you have the choice of whether you'd rather opt for OLED or Neo QLED, without having to sacrifice features.

The only notable difference is that the QN95D doesn't have the excellent 'OLED glare-free' feature that's found on the S95D. This screen filter is so effective at reducing unwanted glare and reflections that we deemed it to be a standout feature on the S95D and would already like to see it on more of Samsung's sets in 2025. 

Now I can't be the only one to see the similarities here. Truthfully, Samsung is probably still scorned by the Mini LED vs OLED battle it fought for many years. After reluctantly adopting OLED (in its own QD-OLED format, of course) in 2022, Samsung has continued to push its premium Neo QLED TVs which has given it a more versatile line-up as a byproduct. Whether this has been an intentional or unintentional outcome, I'm unsure, but it works for me. 

While we often prefer OLED TVs above the rest, we understand that people still have reservations about the screen technology. Burn-in is still a worry among consumers, and backlit TVs tend to be brighter than their self-emissive counterparts. On the other hand, OLED TVs have supreme contrast, black levels and viewing angles. Ultimately, Samsung leaves it down to the individual consumer to pick which model best suits their needs, without sacrificing features. 

And it's not just the flagship models, as Samsung follows this formula throughout a few sets in its lineup. The S90D (OLED) and QN90D (Neo QLED) appear to be mostly equivalent models, as are the S85D (OLED) and QN85D (Neo QLED).

If there's one gripe I have with the Samsung strategy, it's that I wish its flagship sets were a bit cheaper. Its S95D is priced at £3599 / $3400 / AU$4999, while we reviewed the QN95D at £3699 (US and Australia pricing to be confirmed). 

MORE:

Read our full Samsung QN900D 8K TV review

As well as our Samsung S90D hands on review

And check out our picks for the best Samsung TVs

TOPICS
Senior Staff Writer

Lewis Empson is a Senior Staff Writer on What Hi-Fi?. He was previously Gaming and Digital editor for Cardiff University's 'Quench Magazine', Lewis graduated in 2021 and has since worked on a selection of lifestyle magazines and regional newspapers. Outside of work, he enjoys gaming, gigs and regular cinema trips.