CYP AU-D160 review

This DAC promises much, but delivers disappointment Tested at £135

What Hi-Fi? Verdict

The idea is a fine one, but the execution is slapdash by CYP’s usual standards


  • +

    Lots of functions

  • +

    punchier, more open sound than from the average computer’s DAC


  • -

    Doesn’t organise music into a coherent whole

  • -

    uncertain with rhythms

Why you can trust What Hi-Fi? Our expert team reviews products in dedicated test rooms, to help you make the best choice for your budget. Find out more about how we test.

If the size of its product catalogue is anything to go by, CYP has a little box of electronics for all occasions.

A lot of it is aimed at the professional or ‘custom install’ market, but there’s more than enough to pique our interest.

Take the AU-D160. This little black box has plenty going on.

It’s a (micro) USB-to-optical convertor, it’s a (micro) USB-to-stereo RCA DAC, and it’s a headphone amp.

It’s powered by your source via USB, and aside from inputs and outputs there are some overly bright telltale lights to indicate a) it’s working and b) at what sampling rate.

That’s the lot – frankly that’s plenty for a box measuring 4x9x9cm.

Disappointing sound
A different sound – but better? Functionality is all very well, but without performance it doesn’t count for much: sad to relate, this is the first CYP product we’ve tested that’s been disappointing.

The obvious use for a USB DAC (or headphone amp, for that matter) is to offer an improvement on the (theoretically) indifferent sound of music stored on a PC or Mac.

But when wired between our standard Apple MacBook and reference Bryston pre-amplifier, and given an uncompressed file of The Hold Steady’s Sequestered in Memphis to convert, the sound is simply different from – rather than better than – the sound the Mac makes when connected to the Bryston via its headphone socket.

Lacks organisation
It certainly sounds more spacious, and offers a touch more midrange clarity. There’s no doubt it digs a little deeper and hits a little harder where the low end is concerned, too.

But it’s less well organised than the Apple’s internal DAC, with a much vaguer grasp of timing and integration and, as a consequence, music is more difficult to follow and rhythms don’t snap as they ought.

It’s a similar story when using the headphone section: a superficially more attacking presentation, comprehensively undermined by lumpy, uncertain timing. We’d always recommend using a DAC when accessing hard-drive-stored music. Just not this one.

See all our headphone amp reviews

Follow on Twitter

Join on Facebook

What Hi-Fi?

What Hi-Fi?, founded in 1976, is the world's leading independent guide to buying and owning hi-fi and home entertainment products. Our comprehensive tests help you buy the very best for your money, with our advice sections giving you step-by-step information on how to get even more from your music and movies. Everything is tested by our dedicated team of in-house reviewers in our custom-built test rooms in London, Reading and Bath. Our coveted five-star rating and Awards are recognised all over the world as the ultimate seal of approval, so you can buy with absolute confidence.

Read more about how we test