Samsung's S95B QD-OLED TV finally has a release date and price, but where's the 'QD' bit?

Samsung S95B QD-OLED TV
(Image credit: Samsung)

Samsung's QD-OLED TV is finally official. What's more, it now has a name (S95B), a rough release date that's earlier than expected and a price that's lower than expected. This should be cause for excitement and celebration, but Samsung has made yet another baffling decision in its marketing.

Before we get to that, though, here's the good stuff: the Samsung S95B QD-OLED TV will be available from April, priced at just $2200 for the 55-inch model and $3000 for the 65-incher. Those prices are from Samsung's US website which, for the record, originally listed pries of $2400 and $3500. The S95B is yet to appear on the UK or Australian Samsung sites, though we're told that pre-orders in the UK at least will be opening 'soon'.

Unlike most of Samsung's 4K QLED TVs, the S95B QD-OLED boasts four HDMI 2.1 sockets that support 4K/120Hz signals from next-gen consoles and high-end PCs.

That's all exciting stuff, but the most thrilling thing about the Samsung S95B is that it's a groundbreaking product. A TV designed to combine the best elements of OLED with the best elements of QLED to form a next-gen hybrid television. A QD-OLED.

But here's the thing: Samsung isn't marketing the S95B as a 'QD-OLED'. It's referring to it simply as an 'OLED'. In fact, in none of the marketing is there any mention of Quantum Dots. Establishing that this is, in fact, a QD-OLED and not a standard OLED involves digging deep into the specs on Samsung's US website to find this slightly mysterious phrase: '100% Colour Volume with Quantum Dot'.

Well, consider my flabber well and truly gasted. Why would a company come up with a TV featuring brand new panel technology and then go out of its way to make it look as if it's nothing new at all?

It's an especially peculiar decision when you consider that reports last year suggested that Samsung was actually planning to omit the 'OLED' portion of the 'QD-OLED' monicker in order to distance its new panel technology from standard OLED, which it's been campaigning against for years. That would have been very petty, but at least it would have made a weird sort of sense. To omit the 'QD' bit? The differentiating bit? The exciting bit? That's just odd.

What's all the fuss about? QD-OLED explained

Here's the full 2022 Samsung TV lineup

Tom Parsons

Tom Parsons has been writing about TV, AV and hi-fi products (not to mention plenty of other 'gadgets' and even cars) for over 15 years. He began his career as What Hi-Fi?'s Staff Writer and is now the TV and AV Editor. In between, he worked as Reviews Editor and then Deputy Editor at Stuff, and over the years has had his work featured in publications such as T3, The Telegraph and Louder. He's also appeared on BBC News, BBC World Service, BBC Radio 4 and Sky Swipe. In his spare time Tom is a runner and gamer.