155 posts / 0 new
Last post
busb's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 2 weeks ago
Joined: 14/06/2011 - 20:08
Posts: 929
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

cheeseboy]</p> <p>[quote=Rimse wrote:

 No,you are wrong,it has nothing to do digital data.But the wire inside is diffrent ,so this means data will go faster or slower.Next just imagine that wire inside is coffee inside cup ,adding more or less coffe will retain aroma of coffe( in this case DATA) and taste will be like coffe,but  the taste (in this case sound) will stronger or lighter,bitter or sweeter.,adding sugar or milk wil affect taste as well.Thats what people hear.Many states blind taste.Ok I would say Blind taste for blind people.Usually they have better hearing.And then we'll see who is wrong who is right ROFL

Besides that ,to remember tone of frequencies is more dificult then words.Tones usually very quickly are changing in music and this is the basic cause why blind test are failing .Human's brain can't memorize such amount of information.

Edited 'cos I can't read proper!

mitch65's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 15 hours ago
Joined: 16/12/2003 - 12:50
Posts: 1153
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

ifor wrote:

abacus wrote:

ifor wrote:

This might interest you.

http://www.gspaudio.co.uk/lautus-audio-interconnect.htm

What a load of clap trap, A digital interconnect only carries digital data, NOT audio or video.

As for the rest of the gobbledygook on the website, words fail me; I had to look twice to make sure it wasn’t April Fools Day.

Unbelievable (Literally)

Bill

It's probably one of the most honest, informative and educational HiFi websites there is , but I accept you might not see it way.

Don't USB, coaxial and optical cables do the same job - transfer digital data from one point to another - and if so shouldn't we be slagging off every manufacturer of these cables rather than just the one mentioned above and, obviously, any magazine reviewing them.

If I'm being stupendously thick here then I apologise but before I start launching into an attack on anyone or their company then I want to know the facts first.

 

Rimse's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 1 day ago
Joined: 14/12/2012 - 10:33
Posts: 46
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Ok everybody who think good abaut your hearing memory ,just think what you remember from track in your mind when playback stoped playing.Just answer to this questions yourselfs and you will have facts Blum 3

Technics se-a3000,su-c3000,Bryston BDA-1,Harbeth SHL5,Grado PS1000,Atlas titan,hyper2.0

Krell kav500i,Technics sl-p2000,atlas elektra xlr,Dynaudio c1

 

 

BigH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 hours 9 min ago
Joined: 29/12/2012 - 12:31
Posts: 3654
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Rimse wrote:

Ok everybody who think good abaut your hearing memory ,just think what you remember from track in your mind when playback stoped playing.Just answer to this questions yourselfs and you will have facts Blum 3

 

So hearing different cables or speakers is a waste of time then if you can't remember?

Rimse's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 1 day ago
Joined: 14/12/2012 - 10:33
Posts: 46
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

BigH wrote:

Rimse wrote:

Ok everybody who think good abaut your hearing memory ,just think what you remember from track in your mind when playback stoped playing.Just answer to this questions yourselfs and you will have facts Blum 3

 

So hearing different cables or speakers is a waste of time then if you can't remember?

don't play with words and stupid questions ,just answer what you remember from track,what is playing in your mind after several minutes ,after hour and what are you missing Blum 3 ?  Just don't lie at least for yourself Blum 3 For me you can tell lies,no problem ,I won't believe Dirol

Technics se-a3000,su-c3000,Bryston BDA-1,Harbeth SHL5,Grado PS1000,Atlas titan,hyper2.0

Krell kav500i,Technics sl-p2000,atlas elektra xlr,Dynaudio c1

 

 

BigH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 hours 9 min ago
Joined: 29/12/2012 - 12:31
Posts: 3654
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Rimse wrote:

BigH wrote:

Rimse wrote:

Ok everybody who think good abaut your hearing memory ,just think what you remember from track in your mind when playback stoped playing.Just answer to this questions yourselfs and you will have facts Blum 3

 

So hearing different cables or speakers is a waste of time then if you can't remember?

don't play with words and stupid questions ,just answer what you remember from track,what is playing in your mind after several minutes ,after hour and what are you missing Blum 3 ?  Just don't lie at least for yourself Blum 3 For me you can tell lies,no problem ,I won't believe Dirol

 

Must be missing an expensive cable. ROFL :rofl:

ROTH AV's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 1 week ago
Joined: 04/03/2011 - 12:49
Posts: 112
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

An audible difference between USB cables ?

Really ?

Laughed so hard my bum bled.

Covenanter's picture
Offline
Last seen: 16 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 20/07/2012 - 10:16
Posts: 1354
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Do people here actually known what a digital signal is?  Basically it's a string of 1s and 0s and that's all represented by + and - voltages.  Now as long as a cable doesn't convert 1s into 0s or vice versa, and it would have to be a pretty s**t cable to do that, the receiving device can recover the original signal completely.  There is a piece of maths called "Shannon's Theorem" that proves this and that's been known for what must be over 50 years now.

This imperviousness to signal degredation is why CDs don't suffer (in general) from the type of pops and clicks you can get from vinyl and why DAB radio doesn't get the type of interference FM radio can get.  The actual timing of the 1s and 0s doesn't matter either because the receiving device can store the incoming signal in a buffer and take it out at the correct rate.  This is why CD players in cars don't suffer from the movement of the car.

So as long as a USB or any other digital cable delivers the 1s and 0s in a form where they can be recognised as such it doesn't actually matter what it does to the signal.  After all you can download Gigabytes of computer information down a USB cable and it all gets to the other end in perfect condition and a digitised music signal is identical in nature.

So any talk of cables being able to modify the nature of a digital signal in some systematic way, for example enhancing the sound stage or providing deeper bass, is on a par with believing in the tooth fairy.

As I said before, some people will still hear differences between digital cables but what is going on is going on in their heads not in any objective world.

Chris

Marantz PM8005 / SA8005 / KEF R700s / AKG K702

BronC's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 2 days ago
Joined: 26/06/2010 - 08:11
Posts: 99
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

I'm sure that if you were to give me $600 I could make you a USB cable that you could hear a difference between it and a "standard" cable when you streamed digital audio or music

I would make it with material of such a high resistance that the data transfer rate would be so slow that just enough data would get through in sufficient time to be processed for you to hear or see something but most of it would be lost

We must not confuse data transfer with data streaming.  Streaming has a time element involved.  The data is useless if it arrives too late.

How the lack of data manifests itself to the listener or viewer is probably in poorer SQ or PQ.  How they describe this porrer quality is obviously subjective

pauln's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 7 hours ago
Joined: 26/02/2008 - 13:10
Posts: 700
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Covenanter wrote:

Do people here actually known what a digital signal is?  Basically it's a string of 1s and 0s and that's all represented by + and - voltages.  Now as long as a cable doesn't convert 1s into 0s or vice versa, and it would have to be a pretty s**t cable to do that, the receiving device can recover the original signal completely.  There is a piece of maths called "Shannon's Theorem" that proves this and that's been known for what must be over 50 years now.

This imperviousness to signal degredation is why CDs don't suffer (in general) from the type of pops and clicks you can get from vinyl and why DAB radio doesn't get the type of interference FM radio can get.  The actual timing of the 1s and 0s doesn't matter either because the receiving device can store the incoming signal in a buffer and take it out at the correct rate.  This is why CD players in cars don't suffer from the movement of the car.

So as long as a USB or any other digital cable delivers the 1s and 0s in a form where they can be recognised as such it doesn't actually matter what it does to the signal.  After all you can download Gigabytes of computer information down a USB cable and it all gets to the other end in perfect condition and a digitised music signal is identical in nature.

So any talk of cables being able to modify the nature of a digital signal in some systematic way, for example enhancing the sound stage or providing deeper bass, is on a par with believing in the tooth fairy.

As I said before, some people will still hear differences between digital cables but what is going on is going on in their heads not in any objective world.

Chris

So you're saying that a wire isn't like coffee in a cup to which you can add milk or sugar to alter the taste??

andyjm's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 20 hours ago
Joined: 20/07/2012 - 11:49
Posts: 756
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Covenanter wrote:

 The actual timing of the 1s and 0s doesn't matter either because the receiving device can store the incoming signal in a buffer and take it out at the correct rate.  This is why CD players in cars don't suffer from the movement of the car.

Does your DAC do this? Very few do.

Most rely on slaving their clock to the input bitstream.

 

Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

[UNPUBLISHED - banned user]

CnoEvil wrote:

ifor wrote:

I'm quite sure that a lot of expensive "audiophile" USB cables are nothing special; they are no more than cons, but I for one believe that there are some rather special USB cables available.  When I have a need, which currently I don't, I will compare.

I recomend you give a listen to the D-Fi from Vertere, when the time comes.  :silenced:

 

 

Vertere do not make USB cables!
Alec's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 35 min ago
Joined: 08/10/2007 - 21:06
Posts: 6114
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap
Anonymous
Anonymous's picture
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Alec wrote:

http://www.custom-cable.co.uk/vertere-acoustics-d-fi-usb-interconnect-cable.html

It'll make no difference, but it does exist.

Yes they do exist, but underneath the shiny plastic and Vertere branding, there'll be a simple USB cable that's been "made" on an automated production line somewhere, probably China, but certainly not in some Vertere factory.

They do apparently, actually make interconnects, though, This one by hand. It costs £3950.

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 15 hours ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6395
RE: usb cables expensive v cheap

Alec wrote:

http://www.custom-cable.co.uk/vertere-acoustics-d-fi-usb-interconnect-cable.html

It'll make no difference, but it does exist.

 

And indeed WHF gave it 5 stars, along with the usual guff that perpetuates these myths:

 

http://www.whathifi.com/review/vertere-pulse-d-fi

Pages

Log in or register to post comments