Have your say & ask the experts!

USB connection vs Optical Toslink

2 replies [Last post]
SteveR750
SteveR750's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 3089

The DACmagic + using it's own ASIO driver is Cambridge Audio's reccommended set up, but the amount of noise interference from te laptop is disturbing. The optical connection is much quieter, but sound softer, a little less dynamic. There's no more sibilance or harshness that might be attributable to more jitter, just seems a little flatter, less exciting somehow as if the grilles have been left on the speakers.

Is this similar experience with other DACs? I've read that the NAD C390DD sounds better via optical than USB unless there is an Empircial Audio Off Ramp used between PC and amp (not figured out yet what this does the J River doesn't do with the Dacmagic anyway in USB async mode....)

__________________

JRiver MC17 -> Cambridge Audio DACmagic+ -> Roksan Caspian M2 -> ProAc D18 

Gerrardasnails
Gerrardasnails's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Sep 2007
Posts: 6398
RE: USB connection vs Optical Toslink

I use optical and have no issues from my pc

__________________

Screen - Samsung UE46D8000.  Sources - Dell Zino HD 410; Sky HD; Sony BDP S550; Wyred 4 Sound DAC1.  Amps - Yamaha RX-A3010; SimAudio Moon I-3 RS.  Speakers - Vienna Acoustics Mozart Grand; Vienna Acoustics Waltz Grand centre; Proficient Audio W690 rears; Monitor Audio RSW12.  Cables - Van Damme Blue 4mm speaker cable; Townsend DCT300 and Atlas Voyager interconnects; Van den Hul Optocoupler.

SteveR750
SteveR750's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 3089
RE: USB connection vs Optical Toslink

Have you compared it to USB?

__________________

JRiver MC17 -> Cambridge Audio DACmagic+ -> Roksan Caspian M2 -> ProAc D18