The VPL-VW1000ES is deeply impressive with the limited amount of 4K2K material we’ve seen, but its price is on the high side when performance with established formats is considered
Does this projector support high frame rates in either 2K or 4K, i.e. 48 or 60fps? As this is where things are headed then this is something of a white elephant if it doesn't.
Why does a image with 4.267 times as many pixels as a 1080p image give rise to such a huge file? 114 50GB blurays is 5.7TB which for a two hour film is 0.8GB/s. I'd love a connection that could download a file this size in a month let alone 'many hours or a few days'.
It's a double-edged sword, this. First, don't forget that it's four times as many pixels as a Full HD image per frame of video. So if there's 24 frames per second, that's a lot more data from the get-go.
Second, there's no compression standard for 4K at the moment - there's no commercially available content that makes it necessary. It's all raw footage, which takes up boat-loads of space.
To put that in context, an uncompressed two-hour Full HD movie might run to something like 800GB, most of which has to be thrown away during compression to make it fit onto a 25- or 50GB Blu-ray disc. So when you look at it like that, it's easy to see how a 4K picture would be in the terabyte range.
Comments
Does this projector support high frame rates in either 2K or 4K, i.e. 48 or 60fps? As this is where things are headed then this is something of a white elephant if it doesn't.
Will a 4K2K torrent blow-out the acceptable use policy on my broadband?
Suspect it might!
Why does a image with 4.267 times as many pixels as a 1080p image give rise to such a huge file? 114 50GB blurays is 5.7TB which for a two hour film is 0.8GB/s. I'd love a connection that could download a file this size in a month let alone 'many hours or a few days'.
It's a double-edged sword, this. First, don't forget that it's four times as many pixels as a Full HD image per frame of video. So if there's 24 frames per second, that's a lot more data from the get-go.
Second, there's no compression standard for 4K at the moment - there's no commercially available content that makes it necessary. It's all raw footage, which takes up boat-loads of space.
To put that in context, an uncompressed two-hour Full HD movie might run to something like 800GB, most of which has to be thrown away during compression to make it fit onto a 25- or 50GB Blu-ray disc. So when you look at it like that, it's easy to see how a 4K picture would be in the terabyte range.
It may only get four stars but for £16 I'll take two!
Price error – courtesy of demons in our content management system – now sorted.
Weird, I updated the price first thing this morning, obviously didn't save in the CMS.