Have your say & ask the experts!

Running in a DAC..Why???

6 replies [Last post]
memarkiam
memarkiam's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Jan 2012
Posts: 14

I got an Arcam rDAC kw with the rWand for my iPod, and of course have seen lots of refenrences to the need to 'run in' a DAC for 70+ hours. I'm just puzzled why this would be needed.

 

The Digital part of the DAC is surely just running a mathematical algorithm, which I can't imagine changes over time...?

 

The analogue part...well, I guess a signal/current (or something! Wink runs through these parts - but really, what changes here over use???

 

Just wondering if anyone really knows, if this is just an urban audio myth, or ???

 

I'm going to leave mine running continutally for several days. By Sunday evening it should have had it's 70 hours or so, so I'll guess I'll find out for myself if I can hear the difference! Wink

 

Mark

igglebert
igglebert's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Aug 2007
Posts: 4404
RE: Running in a DAC..Why???

I think that a more likely explanation for changes in sound over this time is that you get used to the sound.

eggontoast
eggontoast's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Feb 2011
Posts: 1148
RE: Running in a DAC..Why???

And I feel one of those threads coming on banging head against wall

6th.replicant
6th.replicant's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2007
Posts: 2892
RE: Running in a DAC..Why???

I'm only able to comment after hands-on experience - ahem! - but my rDAC sounded 'orrible out of the box - very plodding, with flabby bass.

Following advice from Arcam's tech dept, I ran-in the rDAC for one-week/100+ hours. And Arcam offered a full refund, if, after the run-in period, I couldn't hear any improvement.

During the run-in week I did not listen to the rDAC, therefore, it wouldn't be a case of my hearing becoming accustomed/"used to the sound".

After the week/100+ hours, the difference was marked: much tighter bass, with more pace and attack - don't ask me how or why the changes occurred, I've no idea.

FWIW, I didn't take up Arcam's refund offer... 

AnotherJoe
AnotherJoe's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Jun 2011
Posts: 659
RE: Running in a DAC..Why???

I cant think of any reason why you would need to run in a DAC. All it does is take a digital (usually binary) signal at a point in time and convert it to a analog voltage. Transistors do not need a break-in period, there are no moving parts.

 

Speakers may need to be run in to loosen the drivers, and old valve-style amps needed to be warmed up for the cathode heater to get to the optimum temperature. But DACs with ICs - no.

 

__________________

Server Synology 8Bay DS1812+, Synology 4Bay DS412+, Sky+HD 

Lounge Samsung UE55D9000, Denon DBT-3313, Onkyo TX-NR5009, Tannoy Arena Highline 500 LCR, ACRyan playon!HD mini2 

Reception Samsung UE46C8000, Panasonic BDP310, Sony STR-DA5400ES, KEF2005.3, ACRyan playon!HD mini2 

SteveR750
SteveR750's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 3089
RE: Running in a DAC..Why???

AnotherJoe wrote:

I cant think of any reason why you would need to run in a DAC. All it does is take a digital (usually binary) signal at a point in time and convert it to a analog voltage. Transistors do not need a break-in period, there are no moving parts.

 

Speakers may need to be run in to loosen the drivers, and old valve-style amps needed to be warmed up for the cathode heater to get to the optimum temperature. But DACs with ICs - no.

 

 

You might want to take this up with Cyrus.... Wink

__________________

JRiver MC17 -> Cambridge Audio DACmagic+ -> Roksan Caspian M2 -> ProAc D18 

busb
busb's picture
Offline
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 584
RE: Running in a DAC..Why???

My new M-DAC now sounds less harsh & jumpy after being used for nearly 100hrs. I cannot offer an explanation as to why. I'm also aware of the idea that it's us the listener who aclimatises. A bit of both perhaps. Chord suggest that my new digital coax cable needs running-in - I'm far more skeptical about that!

__________________

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds - the pessimist fears this is true."

James Branch Cabell

_________________________________________________________

MAINApple TV2 & iTunes Match, CA Azur 751BD or Panasonic P42V20B into audiolab M-DAC, feeding a Primare A34.2 via XLRs, 2x 5m of Atlas Ascent 2 firing up Totem Arros.

ON THE HOOF: iPhone 4GS/Sennheiser MM450.

 

Another interest:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/busb/