Have your say & ask the experts!

Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

21 replies [Last post]
PJ1200
PJ1200's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Posts: 223

All I've just made a very instinctive purchase and ordered a Apple TV2 off Amazon (£85 for those of you that are interested). Problem is I'm not sure why!

Currently I have an old PC sat upstairs with all my music and photos on. I currently don't store any movies, but this may change. This PC runs iTunes on it, and I stream my music to my hifi using an AEX which is a 'client' (is that the right word) to my wireless router. I have an external drive that I use to back up my important files. I am very close to chopping in my PC and getting myself fully immersed into the world of Apple (probably a imac and an ipad - or a macbook pro). During this 'upgrade' I will be looking to store my music & photo files on an external drive, and naturally aim towards a Time Capsule.  I was hoping transfer my files from my external drive to the TC and then run the apple products 'free' of hd-filling files. I'm sure this won't be as simple as I hope - but that's another thread.

Anyway, I was hoping that I could purchase the TC, transfer the data and use it as a kind of 'NAS' device where I could stream music, access files etc from any 'Apple' product in the house (iphone/pad/mac/tv). This appears not to be the case.... Once I've set up the ATV and synced it to itunes, I'm still going to have to have the computer ON in order to stream music/photos etc? Is there anything the ATV will be able to do that WILL NOT require the computer to be on? Is this likely to change in the future.

I'm clearly no IT wizard, but surely the end game is to have everything on an external wireless drive that you can access with any piece of equipment it is paired to within your home!? Why do have to have a PC/Mac on (with iTunes installed and open) in order to access files that are stored on your TC (or other storage device)???? Can someone help? Just as important, have I made a mistake in forking out £85? (I appreciate I should have done my research prior to purchase!)

Cheers PJ

 

__________________

HiFi: Sony TA-FB940R Integrated Amp, Sony CDP-XB930 CD player, Acoustic Energy Aegis, Apple Airport Express (V2). Sonos Play 3 and Bridge

AV: Denon AVR-2310, KEF 3005, Sky HD, Apple TV2, Panasonic BD Player. 

TV: Panasonic TX-P50GT50

PJ1200
PJ1200's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Posts: 223
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

All - apologies for the lack of paragraphs....

__________________

HiFi: Sony TA-FB940R Integrated Amp, Sony CDP-XB930 CD player, Acoustic Energy Aegis, Apple Airport Express (V2). Sonos Play 3 and Bridge

AV: Denon AVR-2310, KEF 3005, Sky HD, Apple TV2, Panasonic BD Player. 

TV: Panasonic TX-P50GT50

John Duncan
John Duncan's picture
Online
Joined: 8 Jan 2008
Posts: 20442
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

have added some for clarity.

__________________

CA StreamMagic 6  |  CA 751BD  |  CA 651A  |  PMC DB1i

Moderator. mail: john.duncan.whf at the mail of g dot com

professorhat
professorhat's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 10256
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

Sounds like you have since you do need iTunes to stream to Apple TV, therefore you will need your computer switched on. It's no great shakes though as Amazon are bound by law to accept it as a return within 7 days for a full refund. And even if they weren't, my personal experience of Amazon's customer service suggests to me they would do this anyway to ensure customer satisfaction.

What you need instead is the original white Apple TV with built in hard drive - they're not available to buy new any more, but you can still pick one up secondhand. Make sure you get one with enough space to store your music and photos though - there are two models, the 40 GB and the 160 GB.

EDIT - reading your post a bit more thoroughly, it's worth pointing out you will be able to stream music and photos from an iDevice (iPhone, iPod Touch or iPad) using Airplay. So if this is what you needed, the one you've ordered will be good enough. However, if you want to stream from your iTunes library, iTunes will need to be running.

 

PJ1200
PJ1200's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Posts: 223
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

Thanks PH - much appreciated

Doesn't it seem rather strange/odd that you can't use the TC as a base station to stream iTunes stuff to your devices??!

My PC is currently full - and (other than programmes) it's all music/photos.  I suspect more than 160gb in total too!!! 

I like the idea of airplay from devices, but of course I don't have all my music or photos on my iPhone.  So this brings us back to the first point above.  If Apple are offering a storage/backup device such as the TC that has built in wifi, why can't you use it as a complete base station to stream information to other devices?

Is this a flaw with iTunes?  Could I get a more 'traditional' device - such a NAS or will I still have the same issues - i.e. iTunes needs to be 'on'. 

Am I missing something, or is that all madness?? puzzled

__________________

HiFi: Sony TA-FB940R Integrated Amp, Sony CDP-XB930 CD player, Acoustic Energy Aegis, Apple Airport Express (V2). Sonos Play 3 and Bridge

AV: Denon AVR-2310, KEF 3005, Sky HD, Apple TV2, Panasonic BD Player. 

TV: Panasonic TX-P50GT50

bigboss
bigboss's picture
Offline
Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 9445
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

Not sure about Apple, but Sonos would suit your requirements beautifully. It can play music off a NAS drive.

__________________

My Home Cinema  Pioneer KRP 500A, Yamaha RX-V1900, MA Radius R225HD LCR, R90HD rears, AW12 sub, Panasonic BD60, PS3, Boxee Box, Sky HD, Boxee Box, Logitech Harmony One, Logitech PS3 Adapter, Sonos ZP90

Bedroom Samsung UE32C6510, PS3 slim white, Apple TV, Sonos S5, Sonos ZP90, Audioengine 2, Oppo OPDV971H

Miscellaneous: Synology DS212J + 2 X WD Red 2TB drives, WD 1TB NAS, Sonos ZoneBridge, BT HH3 as modem & AirPort Extreme router

altruistic.lemon
altruistic.lemon's picture
Online
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 1055
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

I'm confused. There's something called itunes server which comes with NAS and media servers. What does this do? I thought it meand you could connect to the library running on such a device without leaving your computer on. In my case, it would mean I could access everything from my Apple TV2 as it can connect to itunes libraries.

Is this not so?

barntonburly
barntonburly's picture
Offline
Joined: 22 Jan 2009
Posts: 1
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

If you havent sent your apple TV back yet you could see if amazon will let you exchange it for a pogoplug pro.

Its basically a device with wireless streaming built in and can be used with your Ipad Iphone etc. I dont think it has any inbult storage itself but you can plug in USB drives with all your media and it them manges the streaming and remote access of said files.

Think you can also download an app for it to let you manage the playlists and do some advanced controls etc. Dont know if thats a better alternative. The only advantage of aplpe tv would be the ability to rent films etc. 

Paul.
Paul.'s picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Nov 2010
Posts: 2406
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

Another option is installing FireCore on your ATV2.  It costs about £14 ($19.99), enables smb support for your nas as well as a million other things.

 

http://firecore.com/atvflash-black

__________________

Paul's BR/805 system thread

(where the photos live) Paul's Flickr page

professorhat
professorhat's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 10256
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

PJ1200 wrote:

Thanks PH - much appreciated

Doesn't it seem rather strange/odd that you can't use the TC as a base station to stream iTunes stuff to your devices??!

My PC is currently full - and (other than programmes) it's all music/photos.  I suspect more than 160gb in total too!!! 

I like the idea of airplay from devices, but of course I don't have all my music or photos on my iPhone.  So this brings us back to the first point above.  If Apple are offering a storage/backup device such as the TC that has built in wifi, why can't you use it as a complete base station to stream information to other devices?

Is this a flaw with iTunes?  Could I get a more 'traditional' device - such a NAS or will I still have the same issues - i.e. iTunes needs to be 'on'. 

Am I missing something, or is that all madness?? puzzled

Well, it depends on your point of view on whether it's a flaw or not, but yes, it's a shame you can't read music and photos direct from a NAS, or espeically a Time Capsule given this is proprietary Apple hardware. Whether this is done by design because Apple can't integrate this functionality (and ensure a consistent performance), or whether it's because they want to be awkward is anyone's guess - one assumes it's the former since there's little to be gained from the latter.

There are ways round it (as others have noted), one is using a different technology to stream everything (such as Sonos, though this is quite expensive and will only do music - albeit doing music very well!), or you could jailbreak the Apple TV and this then gives you more options I think.

There's also the option of enabling Wake On LAN for your new Apple Mac (example here) - this should in theory allowing to be able to power on the Mac from your iPhone (using an appropriate app). If you set iTunes to logon at boot and have an auto-logging on account, you can boot your Mac using the iPhone app from your sofa, wait for it to power on and load iTunes, then control it using the Remote app. Once you're finished, using a power off app (example here) to then power the Mac down.

altruistic.lemon wrote:

I'm confused. There's something called itunes server which comes with NAS and media servers. What does this do? I thought it meand you could connect to the library running on such a device without leaving your computer on. In my case, it would mean I could access everything from my Apple TV2 as it can connect to itunes libraries.

Is this not so?

iTunes Server runs on the NAS and then allows any music stored on this to be seen within iTunes as a Shared Library. It doesn't act as an iTunes client though, so you still need iTunes running somewhere to be able to stream anything on such a device.

 

professorhat
professorhat's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 10256
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

PJ1200 wrote:

During this 'upgrade' I will be looking to store my music & photo files on an external drive, and naturally aim towards a Time Capsule.  I was hoping transfer my files from my external drive to the TC and then run the apple products 'free' of hd-filling files. I'm sure this won't be as simple as I hope - but that's another thread.

Anyway, I was hoping that I could purchase the TC, transfer the data and use it as a kind of 'NAS' device where I could stream music, access files etc from any 'Apple' product in the house (iphone/pad/mac/tv).

Just a quick note on this - Time Capsule is meant to act as backup device, not as an alternative to a NAS. What it does is seamlessly backup your Mac and keeps older "versions" of files and folders, thus allowing you to theoretically restore your Mac to a point in time. This is useful if you take backups regularly, since you have many older copies of a file, rather than just the file in its state last time you took a backup.

So this isn't really appropriate for your use above - if you don't want to store your music, photos and videos on the Mac, you would want to use either a USB disk or a NAS for this, rather than a Time Capsule device as this isn't what it's intended for.

 

PJ1200
PJ1200's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Posts: 223
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

Hmm, all seems rather confusing now!!  I'm even looking at MacMini's - as you can plug those into your TV and it will have itunes on it etc....

Looks like I'm going to have to do some more research!

__________________

HiFi: Sony TA-FB940R Integrated Amp, Sony CDP-XB930 CD player, Acoustic Energy Aegis, Apple Airport Express (V2). Sonos Play 3 and Bridge

AV: Denon AVR-2310, KEF 3005, Sky HD, Apple TV2, Panasonic BD Player. 

TV: Panasonic TX-P50GT50

PJ1200
PJ1200's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jan 2008
Posts: 223
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

And thanks again PH - very informative as usual.

It seems crazy to me!  It really does!  Surely everyone that has a computer has music/films/photos on it.  They want to access these wherever they are (ideally) but certainly using any device in the house. 

You would like to think Apple would do this - from what I've seen, they don't!

__________________

HiFi: Sony TA-FB940R Integrated Amp, Sony CDP-XB930 CD player, Acoustic Energy Aegis, Apple Airport Express (V2). Sonos Play 3 and Bridge

AV: Denon AVR-2310, KEF 3005, Sky HD, Apple TV2, Panasonic BD Player. 

TV: Panasonic TX-P50GT50

professorhat
professorhat's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 10256
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

PJ1200 wrote:

And thanks again PH - very informative as usual.

No problem Smile

PJ1200 wrote:

It seems crazy to me!  It really does!  Surely everyone that has a computer has music/films/photos on it.  They want to access these wherever they are (ideally) but certainly using any device in the house. 

You would like to think Apple would do this - from what I've seen, they don't!

Well, you see if the music / photos / films are located on the computer (as they are probably for most people), then naturally the computer would have to be switched on to access them. So for most people, streaming from iTunes / iPhoto to Apple TV is as they would expect. It's when you want to start storing and accessing them from an external device (like a NAS), that Apple currently doesn't have a "standard" way of doing this without the computer still being switched on. As has been noted though, there are ways round this, which include using non-Apple based streamers - there's nothing stopping you for example, storing your music in iTunes, but with your iTunes library stored on a NAS, and then using, again for example, a Sonos system to stream music direct from the NAS without requiring iTunes.

 

tremon
tremon's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 May 2011
Posts: 320
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

professorhat wrote:
Whether this is done by design because Apple can't integrate this functionality (and ensure a consistent performance), or whether it's because they want to be awkward is anyone's guess - one assumes it's the former since there's little to be gained from the latter.
On the contrary, the latter fits perfectly with Apple's walled garden approach to computing. The more awkward they make interaction with third-party software, the more people will give in and use a complete vertical Apple line (since going entirely non-Apple is uncool). Which gives Apple the leverage they need to sell "consumer solutions" instead of tools.

The iPod -> iTunes -> Store enforcement gave them the market dominance to strongarm music companies

The iPhone/iPad -> Store integration gives Apple complete control over the revenue streams of third-party developers

I'm not sure what the connection is between Airplay and DLNA -- but it wouldn't be out of character for Apple to make them only one-way compatible so that they can add A/V equipment manufacturers to their list of revenue streams. The Apple TV situation is more of the same: sure you can do what you want. You just have to go completely Apple to do it...

professorhat
professorhat's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 10256
RE: Apple TV - have I made a mistake...?

Whilst I see the (inevitable) point you're trying to make, it doesn't really fit in with these circumstances. What we're talking about is Apple not enabling the streaming of an iTunes library stored on another Apple device (namely the Time Capsule) without having a PC or Mac running iTunes switched on. There is no gain for Apple from preventing this - they don't sell some other device which does allow this. So even with a complete Apple setup, it is still impossible to achieve this.

So my assumption therefore is there is a technical issue in doing this - whether that is because they can't guarantee a consistent performance, or whether they might compromise some other functionality from doing so, I've no idea. The idea that they restrict it out of pure spite seems far fetched, but I know there are some ardent Apple haters out there - if this is what you think, hey, knock yourself out.