Have your say & ask the experts!

What is the minimum size 3D TV one needs to buy to appreciate 3d effect particularly watching live sports FAO Andy Clough

14 replies [Last post]
mchander
mchander's picture
Offline
Joined: 10/10/2008
Posts: 20

Hello

last year the smallest 3d tv one could buy was 40inch.

Now you can buy 3d TV in 32 inch

I want to know can one enjoy live 3d sports particularly football in 32 inch size.My room is not very big so i cannt think of 46inch upwards.

somebody mention that you cannt appreciate 3D effect in small screen so i am bit confuse whether shall i go for 40 inch or  32 inch size will be ok.

Please advise

Thanks

FrankHarveyHiFi
FrankHarveyHiFi's picture
Online
Joined: 27/06/2008
Posts: 8015
RE: TVs and projectors

You'll get different views on this, but as far as I'm concerned, a 3D picture should take up your whole field of vision, so suits projectors more than TV's.

__________________

David @Frank Harvey Hi-Fi, Coventry, incorporating HiFix

Hi-Fi and Home Cinema specialists, and exclusive UK agents for SVS and Ken Kreisel's KK Sound home theatre products.

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30/05/2007
Posts: 27796
RE: TVs and projectors

It's really down to the distance at which you view the screen: I've found that 3D works best if the screen more or less fills your field of vision, as you're then not distracted by 'real' 3D objects around it. Turning out the lights is an alternative, but really the bigger the screen the better for a convincing 3D effect. If you like that kind of thing...

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com
Audio Editor, Gramophone

markjaspi
markjaspi's picture
Offline
Joined: 30/07/2007
Posts: 1288
RE: TVs and projectors

And the award for the longest post title goes too.....

__________________

Viewing: Panasonic 50GT30B / AV: Marantz SR5006 | Boston Acoustics A360/A225C/A25 rear / Hi-Fi: KEF R100 | Marantz PM7004 / Sources: Panasonic BDT310| Sky+ 1TB HD | Virgin TiVo | iPad 2 | iPhone 4S | New Apple TV / Control: Roomie via iPad & iPhone

 

 

Lee H
Lee H's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/10/2010
Posts: 1366
RE: TVs and projectors

markjaspi wrote:

And the award for the longest post title goes too.....

 

Who?

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30/05/2007
Posts: 27796
RE: TVs and projectors

Jinx, David. And sad to hear that award has gone too – we've lost too many recently...

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com
Audio Editor, Gramophone

def lugs
def lugs's picture
Offline
Joined: 03/07/2010
Posts: 147
RE: TVs and projectors

I am not a big 3D fan. I have a 42" TV watching from a distance of 1.8-2metres away. I viewed a bit of the wimbledon finals, this is the first time I have tried to watch 3D in bright daylight conditions. I found the 3D to give a fish tank impression - i.e. inside the TV it was 3D but nothing was leaping out of the screen. Even sitting closer it still was not too impressive. I also found the flicker just off my field of vision from the active glasses distracting.

I closed the second blind, stopping the sunlight from entering the room and the 3D effect really came into effect and worked a treat. Even sat back in my original viewing position. As Andrew mentioned above watching 3D in a totally darkened room enhances the 3D effect tremendously.

But as it was Tennis I didn't watch much more.

Andy Clough
Andy Clough's picture
Offline
Joined: 27/04/2004
Posts: 4893
RE: TVs and projectors

I recorded the Wimbledon men's final in 3D but haven't watched it yet (been away). I'll have a look on my 40in Samsung tonight once the sun's gone down... and yes, I do know who won Smile

__________________

Andy Clough is Editor of whathifi.com

hammill
hammill's picture
Offline
Joined: 20/03/2008
Posts: 1745
RE: TVs and projectors

Andrew Everard wrote:

 And sad to hear that award has gone too – we've lost too many recently...

I see what you did there.

craigtumilty
craigtumilty's picture
Offline
Joined: 13/07/2010
Posts: 196
RE: TVs and projectors

I'd say for 1m distance 46" Screen and for 2m 55" screen - this is minimum.

I have a 46" screen and sit 2.2m away and it doesnt look good until im close up. sometimes things come out of the screen and it looks ok but from 80cm it looks so much better

For good 3D i would only suggest a projector and avoid Samsung C series as my 46c8000 suffers from crosstalk very badly during sky sports 3d broadcasts. BluRay is usually within tolerance.

I enjoy watching films in 3D but sports i prefer to watch them in 2D as all it does is increase depth in the tv

__________________

Samsung UE46C8000 | Samsung LE40M86 | Yamaha AV 7.1 RX 667 | Monitor Audio BX2 AV Speakers | Samsung BD-C5900 | Popcorn Hour A200 | WDTV Live | PS3 160GB | Virgin TiVO 500GB | DM800S Motorised 1m Satellite Setup | Synology DS210j [6TB] | XBOX 360 20GB |

chebby
chebby's picture
Online
Joined: 02/06/2008
Posts: 11066
RE: TVs and projectors

craigtumilty wrote:
I'd say for 1m distance 46" Screen and for 2m 55" screen - this is minimum. I have a 46" screen and sit 2.2m away and it doesnt look good until im close up. sometimes things come out of the screen and it looks ok but from 80cm it looks so much better.

80 cm?

So that's 31 inches viewing distance before the picture on a 46 inch screen looks it's best?

Crikey.

__________________

Marantz M-CR603 + AirPlay • Rega R3 loudspeakers • iPhone 4 32GB • iMac • Panasonic TX-L32D25B • Sony BDP-S390 • Vita Audio R1 MkII • Humax HDR-Fox T2

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30/05/2007
Posts: 27796
RE: TVs and projectors

chebby wrote:
So that's 31 inches viewing distance before the picture on a 46 inch screen looks it's best?

I guess if you get bored with what's showing you could always play 'count the pixels'...

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com
Audio Editor, Gramophone

f1only
f1only's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/04/2010
Posts: 786
RE: TVs and projectors

Blimey, going by that measurement i'm gonna need a tv measuring 144" minimum ( does anyone make one? ). I have a feeling that may be massively ( dont know thats oxford english but hey what the heck ) out of my price range, not to mention it will block off my exit through the main living room door, looks like a projector may be the next upgrade.Laughing

__________________

Samsung TV's ■ Yamaha RX-V767 ■ Pioneer BDP320 ■ Virgin Tivo ■ PS3 PHAT 60gb & Slim 320gb ■ Sony BDP S380 ■ Dali Ikon 5 Front L/R Ikon Vocal 2 Centre Ikon 1 SurroundParadigm PDR-10 SubCablesUK Ultimate Gold 17.8 Gigabit V1.4 HDMI's Profigold FlatFlex Ultra Speaker CableTacima CS929C Mains Conditioners

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30/05/2007
Posts: 27796
RE: TVs and projectors

f1only wrote:
Blimey, going by that measurement i'm gonna need a tv measuring 144" minimum ( does anyone make one? ).

Yes, Panasonic has a 152in plasma. Half a mill to you, squire...

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com
Audio Editor, Gramophone

f1only
f1only's picture
Offline
Joined: 07/04/2010
Posts: 786
RE: TVs and projectors

Cool i'm sure my unemployment benefit that i now get £0 per week will pay for it lol

__________________

Samsung TV's ■ Yamaha RX-V767 ■ Pioneer BDP320 ■ Virgin Tivo ■ PS3 PHAT 60gb & Slim 320gb ■ Sony BDP S380 ■ Dali Ikon 5 Front L/R Ikon Vocal 2 Centre Ikon 1 SurroundParadigm PDR-10 SubCablesUK Ultimate Gold 17.8 Gigabit V1.4 HDMI's Profigold FlatFlex Ultra Speaker CableTacima CS929C Mains Conditioners