27 posts / 0 new
Last post
gel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 44 min ago
Joined: 22/11/2008 - 19:22
Posts: 12810
CES TVs

Why are these clowns just mainly showing 60 inch plus TVs?  The majority could not care less about TVs that size!

chebby's picture
Offline
Last seen: 55 min 56 sec ago
Joined: 02/06/2008 - 09:40
Posts: 15818
RE: CES TVs

gel wrote:

Why are these clowns just mainly showing 60 inch plus TVs?  The majority could not care less about TVs that size!

Because the guest presenters can more easily hide behind / exit behind them.

gel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 44 min ago
Joined: 22/11/2008 - 19:22
Posts: 12810
RE: CES TVs

chebby wrote:

gel wrote:

Why are these clowns just mainly showing 60 inch plus TVs?  The majority could not care less about TVs that size!

Because the guest presenters can more easily hide behind / exit behind them.

 

:grin:

sonycentre's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 30/05/2009 - 22:30
Posts: 637
RE: CES TVs

ROFL :rofl:

chebby wrote:

gel wrote:

Why are these clowns just mainly showing 60 inch plus TVs?  The majority could not care less about TVs that size!

Because the guest presenters can more easily hide behind / exit behind them.

hammill's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 11 hours ago
Joined: 20/03/2008 - 11:46
Posts: 2450
RE: CES TVs

gel wrote:

Why are these clowns just mainly showing 60 inch plus TVs?  The majority could not care less about TVs that size!

If you are demoing to a big crowd, I would have thought it was obvious you would use a big TV. Also, don't forget this is a US show. Large TVs are far more common there.

spiny norman's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 1 week ago
Joined: 14/01/2009 - 12:49
Posts: 958
RE: CES TVs

gel wrote:
Why are these clowns just mainly showing 60 inch plus TVs?  The majority could not care less about TVs that size!

I know, and it's not like the assembled 'tech' hacks, bloggers and blaggers are going to write endless pages of drooling words about ever-pointlessly-bigger screens with ridiculous features like curves, flexibility and – oh, hang on...

gel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 44 min ago
Joined: 22/11/2008 - 19:22
Posts: 12810
RE: CES TVs

hammill wrote:

gel wrote:

Why are these clowns just mainly showing 60 inch plus TVs?  The majority could not care less about TVs that size!

If you are demoing to a big crowd, I would have thought it was obvious you would use a big TV. Also, don't forget this is a US show. Large TVs are far more common there.

 

There was me thinking the whole point of these shows was to show of TVs people are actually interested in buying!  True big TVs are the thing they like buying over there, I still think it is pointless though, if I was in the crowd I would be bored stiff demoing 75 inch TVs - what is to write and report about there?

strapped for cash's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 1 week ago
Joined: 17/08/2009 - 20:56
Posts: 4453
RE: CES TVs

There are no TVs I'm interested in this year.

I can't afford an OLED TV. (Give it three years and prices might be more realistic.) The rest are LED models, with functionality I couldn't care less about. 

I've heard nothing of G series Samsung plasmas. 

emperor's new clothes's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Joined: 28/05/2013 - 20:03
Posts: 105
RE: CES TVs

The US market dwarfs the Uk and their homes can generally accommodate larger TVs. Check out any Best Buy and the median screen at least 55in and their HD transmissions finally match the UK for PQ. The biggest factor is as ever, price The old shoppers addage of 'dollars for Pounds' has been accurate for the last 4 decades from my experience. Rip-off Britain indeed.  For example, I bought an IPad Air for £276 on Black Friday and designer jeans for £24 - £85 for an identical pair here. ATV £99 vs  $99+tax in the Apple store

Pindi's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 21/11/2008 - 11:57
Posts: 573
RE: CES TVs

strapped for cash wrote:

There are no TVs I'm interested in this year.

I can't afford an OLED TV. (Give it three years and prices might be more realistic.) The rest are LED models, with functionality I couldn't care less about. 

I've heard nothing of G series Samsung plasmas. 

 

There's still hope for 2014 Samsung plasmas, strapped...

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/plasma-ces-201401063562.htm

strapped for cash's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 1 week ago
Joined: 17/08/2009 - 20:56
Posts: 4453
RE: CES TVs

Pindi wrote:

There's still hope for 2014 Samsung plasmas, strapped...

http://www.hdtvtest.co.uk/news/plasma-ces-201401063562.htm

True, though there's no guarantee; and I suspect they won't improve on the F8500 in terms of performance. If they can match the F8500 for less that'll still be an extremely good buy. 

Paul.'s picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 14 hours ago
Joined: 26/11/2010 - 21:44
Posts: 2947
RE: CES TVs

I would love to see the Samsung 6500 return, it was a bargain.  My TV was 8 series picture with no cameras, touch pad remote or upgrade ability. 

 

I noticed from Whathifis reporting on speaker stuff that Samsung seem to have skipped the letter G and gone for H series.  Any idea why? Is it like the Japanese being superstitious with the number 4, or a grammatical thing in Korea I wonder?

ellisdj's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 days 2 hours ago
Joined: 11/12/2008 - 17:55
Posts: 1322
RE: CES TVs

Maybe this Year the aim is for 60" to be the new 50".  If they are the same / similar price why would you buy the 50" ?  If you own a 50" why would you buy another 50" or maybe 3 50" sets??? Wink

 

The industry needs to make sales so it has to up the anty year on year - so maybe the aim is for people to want a bigger tv so they buy sooner...

 

Or that possibly is already the case in the States - really dont know onm that front

Pindi's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 21/11/2008 - 11:57
Posts: 573
RE: CES TVs

Paul. wrote:

I would love to see the Samsung 6500 return, it was a bargain.  My TV was 8 series picture with no cameras, touch pad remote or upgrade ability. 

 

I noticed from Whathifis reporting on speaker stuff that Samsung seem to have skipped the letter G and gone for H series.  Any idea why? Is it like the Japanese being superstitious with the number 4, or a grammatical thing in Korea I wonder?

Haha. It's because Samsung hate LG. So, I would imagine that we won't get any 'L' series Samsung TVs.

bigboss's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 37 min ago
Joined: 25/03/2009 - 21:40
Posts: 12640
RE: CES TVs

Size of the TV depends on viewing distance more than affordability, at least in my case. When I was buying my Kuro, I compared both 500A & 600A, and watching the 60-inch model was nauseating at my viewing distance. So I opted for the 50-inch version.

daveh75's picture
Offline
Last seen: 21 hours 50 min ago
Joined: 31/07/2008 - 18:54
Posts: 8334
RE: CES TVs

gel wrote:

 

 

There was me thinking the whole point of these shows was to show of TVs people are actually interested in buying

You thought wrong.

Do you not understand what a trade show is?

 

Pages

Log in or register to post comments