I'm not sure what a "massive" difference would mean. I think the picture would need to be transformed from pretty awful to outstanding for calibration to make that degree of difference.
The picture out of the box is very good on the VT65 and ZT65, but professional calibration will improve things notably. The best way of expressing it, as stated on other threads, is that professional calibration represents the best upgrade you can make without buying a new TV. (Since you already own what's arguably the best TV available, upgrading your television isn't possible, so that last point is hypothetical.)
Professional calibration won't elimate picture judder, though I'm not sure why you're experiencing this with 24p content. Twenty-four frames per second playback isn't perfectly smooth, though trying to iron this out through frame interpellation (your TV guessing what might appear between frames) isn't the answer.
To the best of my knowledge, your Oppo doesn't introduce undefeatable frame interpellation. Nor does it have motion processing options. You might set the Oppo to output video as "source direct." I think the Oppo has this option. That way your BDP shouldn't add any image processing that might lead to anomalies or artifacts.
In any case, engaging frame interpellation really shouldn't be necessary with 24p content. 50Hz material, especially on Panasonic plasma TVs, is another matter altogether. For UK broadcast material, setting IFC to "min" may help with some content, but you shouldn't set the IFC control any higher than this.
Hope that's some help.
I'm guessing 'interpellation' may be a concept you deal with professionally, but here I think you mean 'interpolation'.
HiFi / A/V / Bedroom
I'm starting to annoy myself every bloody thing I watch I fanny about with the intelligent frame creation ,not many people have the zt60 so I don't know what they use ,the picture is awesome without it but then I think it looks better with it on ,there s slight judder here and there with blu ray and DVD but when it's set to max definatly think DVD looks better also maybe I'm a little bit paranoid but I think there is very slight screen shaking yet again is it me changing back and forth to IFC off then set to the max
also I know what a good picture looks like but I've only been into home cinema a year and a half and I've went from the Panasonic gt50 to the Panasonic zt65 the picture on both sets are awesome I don't have anything to compare them too.
Wasp, out of interest what do you have 'sharpness' set at in your picture menu settings? If this is set to anything more than Zero then it can introduce judder with some TV's (as the processing engine is trying to introduce artificial sharpness into the image while also handling motion).
Lounge: Panasonic TX-P60ZT65B (calibrated), Pioneer SC-LX75, Denon DPB-2012, Sky-HD1TB, PS4, Xbox 360, Apple-TV, Atacama Equinox AV stand, Monitor Audio Silver RX8, RXC, RX-FX, RXW-12. Kitchen: Pioneer XC-HM81, Monitor Audio Bronze BX2. Bedroom: Samsung UE37D6510, Samsung BD-C5900, Sky-HD, Pioneer N-50, Rotel RC-03 (pre-amp), Rotel RB-9708X (power-amp), Mordaunt-Short MS914
Yes and yes. (The terms have very different meanings.)
I'm worrying increasingly about brain function, though a solid day and night's return drive from hols probably didn't help. I'm still not feeling very alert.
Hardware: Panasonic TX-P50VT65B (calibrated); Cambridge Audio Azur 651BD; Yamaha RX-A810; Teac PD-H600; PS3; B&W 601 & 600LCR (series 3); Q Acoustics QAV (rear)
Furniture and Accessories: BLOK Classix 3000 Oak AV Cabinet; Atacama Nexus 6 (atabite metal filled); 3D3 A1112
Oh sorry for some reason i thought u were in america.i think the 65 inch ZT woulda been £4500 in the uk i couldnt have stretched my budget that far .i think panasonic thought european houses were to small to justify making more of the expensive panels for europe
Here are my thx home cinema settings at the moment
I know every set is diffrent but are those anywhere near your settings on your ZT
Panasonic TX-P60ZT65 (limited edition - calibrated),Panasonic TX-P50GT50 (calibrated),Oppo 103 Blu Ray Player,Yamaha YSP 2200 Soundbar,Apple iPad 4,iPad mini,iPad Air,IMac i7 27 inch(custom built),Apple TV,iPod Touch 5th Generation,iPhone 5s,Playstation 3(fat),Playstation 4,PS Vita, Xbox360 Elite,Xbox One,Nintendo Wii U,Virgin TiVo box,Ruark R1 ,Ruark R4i,Ruark MR1 Speakers,Bowers & Wilkins P7 Headphones,Lifx Light System.Audioquest Chocolate & Carbon HDMI Cables.
Those settings seem well off mate.
I would guess depending on what gamma setting you have selected - which should be 2.4 without a cal.
I would guess brightness to be around +3 -to + 5 not -10 brightness must be ridiculous dark and crushing / losing loads of detail
Sharpness - minus as much as it goes so not 0 - 30 or whatever it goes down to cant remember
Meridian G61R, HD621, Bryston 9BSST
Optimised Audio PC - J River / JPlay / Custom Full Linear Power Supply
Panasonic 65VT65, Marantz UD7007, HIFi Racks Podium Reference
Monitor Audio GX100, GXC150, Apex A10, BK XLS400 (set with hard knee house curve)
JCAT USB and Sata, Graham Slee Spatia (SC) Graham Slee Lautus Digital / Analogue IC x 9
Thanks for that .i kinda thought the brightness was wrong.im using oblivion as an example because i watched it last night and its fresh im ny head.it looked awesone to me but.what i think is a good picture and WHAT is a good picture must be 2 diffrent things.i had the sharpness at -50 since i got the ZT back in june.but a reviewer said the sharpness should always be at 0 with the panasonics .only been into home cinema for about a year and a half all ive ever owned is the panny gt50 and now the zt60 so any info or thoughts u guys have is welcomed.or until i get the bloody thing calibrated.
Just had a quick look at the settings info steve sent me after he calibrated the set, and the basic settings are as follows:
Contrast = 70
Brightness = 0
Sharpness = 0
Colour = 50
Tint = 0
Colour Temp = Warm (needed because apparently most TV's out the box are tilted towards Blue in favour of Red, as Blue makes whites look whiter in the showroom, and this became blindingly apparent when Steve showed me the 'before' and 'after' results, which I'll post when I'm back home this weekend).
vivid colour = Off
The rest of the stuff is in the 'Advanced Settings' menu, which to be honest aren't worth posting as no two panels are the same, so the finer detail needs to be set by a trained calibrator. When I post the reports over the weekend though you'd be amazed how far out some of the colour aettings were 'out the box', so well worth getting this done when you've invested so much in the TV.
Just checked 0 is as far off as it goes
Missing key details - gamma and what gamma the set is calibrated to. Brightness to 0 must be because the set comes out of black different to the vt. The vt is supposed to come out of black quicker so I would expect brightness to be set lower than the ZT? Also colour temp is semi irrelevant after calibration. I found normal to give better starting results than warm, it does push blue, but warm pushes red so either way you have to change it
Gamma's set at 2.2. Will post the full before & after charts when I get home.
Why Not 2.4 - Its much much much better - I should be the calibrator, people should hire me in
Can't figure out how to copy and paste the full PDF report on the iPhone (any ideas anyone?), but the below (if they post ok) are the colour results that were included as an image in steve's follow up email.
You can see what I mean about blue being pushed massively out the box at the expense of red (I'd played around with some of the settings, but hasn't gone into the advanced colour settings so none of the first graph was due to excessive tweaking on my part I don't think).
Cant answer the 2.2 vs 2.4 question, wont pretend to debate stuff I'm not qualified to comment on, but steve's on Av forum and seems pretty open to sharing his thoughts so drop him a line?
Be interested in your feedback when I get chance to post the full reports.
Gel (if your reading this), the above is what I was referring to when I talked about 10 point adjustment to get both primary and secondary colour space correct.
I don't know how you can do it on a iPhone too. If you do manage it I will check it out though.
Main AV Setup: Panasonic 50VT65 TV, Pioneer Bdp-lx71, Pioneer Vsx-lx70, B&W FPM Series, B&W PV1, Optimum AV300 AV Stand, QED Silver Anniversary XT Speaker Cable & Chord Silver Plus HDMI Cables. Gadgets: iPad 4 & iPhone 4S.
Right, that didn't work (at least dont think it did?), will have to wait, sorry gents.
My Home Cinema Pioneer KRP 500A, Yamaha RX-V1900, MA Radius R225HD LCR, R90HD rears, AW12 sub, Panasonic BD60, PS3, Boxee Box, Sky HD, Boxee Box, Logitech Harmony One, Logitech PS3 Adapter, Sonos ZP90
Bedroom Samsung UE32C6510, PS3 slim white, Apple TV, Sonos S5, Sonos ZP90, Audioengine 2, Oppo OPDV971H
Miscellaneous: Synology DS212J + 2 X WD Red 2TB drives, WD 1TB NAS, Sonos ZoneBridge, BT HH3 as modem & AirPort Extreme router
A professionally calibrated TV typically has a 2.2 day mode and a 2.4 night mode.
The 2.2 setting affords a brighter picture, less likely to wash out in a bright room, while the 2.4 night mode is best suited to a blacked out room. Each is designed to optimise black level, contrast, and shadow detail under specific lighting conditions.
It isn't really a question of better or worse, but about accounting for changeable environmental factors.
© 2014 Haymarket Publishing