Have your say & ask the experts!

Napster Profiteering?

8 replies [Last post]
Andy1071
Andy1071's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 4

Hi Guys, not sure if this has been discussed to death before, but was checking out Napster with a view to buying their "to go" package - then I saw their non UK deals!!


What's the game with Napster charges?


North America - $15 USD per month + a free MP3 player if you sign up.


Europe - 15 euros a month


UK - £15 GBP per month.


What marketing genius thought this was a good idea, or maybe Napster just figured most British are daft enough to spring for it?


Well I won't be giving (on principal) nearly twice what our US cousins pay - however I probably wouldn't mind paying the same.


What's the forum view - and anyone know if there is there a pressure group I can join?


(I can already feel an acorn of resistance to all things Napster, maybe with some further discussion, we might have a few saplings, and with enough interest maybe even a small forest of oak)


(I think the great british public would be interested in Napster worldwide pricing, then we can all make an informed decision on value for money. Goodness knows, with a fair pricing model they could massively increase their market share - I work with university students and this product is right up their street, just overpriced - a straw poll suggests that up to £2 per week seems ok, but the "to go" element is critical for their personal music - maybe a student card deal would go part of the way)

fatboyslimfast
fatboyslimfast's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 2306
Re: Napster Profiteering?

I have been a napster subscriber almost since it's new legal inception.

For me, £10 a month to listen to as much music as I want to (and download it onto my main PC, netbook, for the car, and 1 other) is absolutely brilliant. Think of it as Spotify Premium, but that you can listen to offline.

I'm guessing that other people are also of a similar mind.

As for the "to-go" option, a netbook running Windows ( sub£250) will provide this. I tend to use this to "1st listen", and then if I like the album enough to warrant putting it on my iPod/iPhone, buy the album on CD so I can rip losslessly.

Another thing to consider is that in the US, Napster has to pay ASCAP/BMI/SESAC etc, whilst in the UK it is the PRS. Their fees may well be different.

Horses for courses obv, but the £10 a month suits me fine. Wouldn't bother with the £5 extra though.

__________________

Sources: Technics SL1210Mk2 with Denon DL110/AT-95E, Mac Mini, Virgin V+.

Amplification: Cyrus 2.

Speakers: Mordaunt Short MS20i Pearls with Fisual Super Pearl 2.5mm cable.

Other kit: More than I should have. My loft is creaking.

John Duncan
John Duncan's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jan 2008
Posts: 20423
Re: Napster Profiteering?


They are (generalising), but not £15/$15 different. But it's not relly profiteering, it's just a different economic model. Things are cheaper in the states, they just are.

__________________

CA StreamMagic 6  |  CA 751BD  |  CA 651A  |  PMC DB1i

Moderator. mail: john.duncan.whf at the mail of g dot com

fatboyslimfast
fatboyslimfast's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Jan 2008
Posts: 2306
Re: Napster Profiteering?

And, if you don't agree, vote with your feet! They are a profit-making business after all, not a public service provider!

__________________

Sources: Technics SL1210Mk2 with Denon DL110/AT-95E, Mac Mini, Virgin V+.

Amplification: Cyrus 2.

Speakers: Mordaunt Short MS20i Pearls with Fisual Super Pearl 2.5mm cable.

Other kit: More than I should have. My loft is creaking.

Clare Newsome
Clare Newsome's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jun 2007
Posts: 13733
Re: Napster Profiteering?

The point about different licensing fees is also a very relevant one - it's a maze of different ownership/right legislation in different countries. US tends to be cheaper due to economies of scale - several million more people hearing your song for less cents makes you the same/maybe more money than fewer UK ears paying more pennies....

__________________

Group PR Manager - Computers Unlimited;

Former Group Editor of What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision and Whathifi.com

Twitter: @ClareNewsome

John Duncan
John Duncan's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jan 2008
Posts: 20423
Re: Napster Profiteering?


The wikipedia article on royalties is very interesting for those who have the time...

__________________

CA StreamMagic 6  |  CA 751BD  |  CA 651A  |  PMC DB1i

Moderator. mail: john.duncan.whf at the mail of g dot com

idc
idc's picture
Offline
Joined: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 7782
Re: Napster Profiteering?
fatboyslimfast:
...... For me, £10 a month to listen to as much music as I want to (and download it onto my main PC, netbook, for the car, and 1 other) is absolutely brilliant. Think of it as Spotify Premium, but that you can listen to offline....


Buy Spotify for the year and it works out at £8.25 a month and it has now been approved as an application for the iphone


 http://whathifi.com/News/UPDATE-Spotify-app-for-Apple-iPhone-is-approved/


and I am sure it is a higher bit rate than Napster. Go Spotify!

__________________

Internet - laptop - DAC - amp - lots of headphones.

http://idc1966.blogspot.co.uk/

"A music lover will stop what he's doing and stay glued to a favorite piece of music even if it's coming over a 3" speaker or a public-address system..." - Ken Rockwell

 

chebby
chebby's picture
Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2008
Posts: 13195
Re: Napster Profiteering?
Clare Newsome:
The point about different licensing fees is
also a very relevant one - it's a maze of different ownership/right
legislation in different countries. US tends to be cheaper due to
economies of scale - several million more people hearing your song for
less cents makes you the same/maybe more money than fewer UK ears
paying more pennies....


And 15 percent VAT.

Doesn't explain the whole difference.

iTunes downloads in the USA are 69 cents, 99 cents and 1.29 dollars.

Here in the UK,  iTunes track downloads are all 79p ($1.2cool so we are paying the 'premium' USA rate for all single downloads.

UK album downloads are usually £7.99 ($12.9cool and in the USA the typical price is $9.99 so, again,  a $3 premium this side of the pond.

This is normal in most situations where you compare CDs, LPs, books, camera gear etc.

By the time you have paid for P&P and VAT and duty (where applicable) it is usually better to buy locally. (Also most 'hard' goods in the USA only have a 90 day warranty compared to our 1 year.)

You only have to compare their lower taxes and fuel costs to begin to see why this gap exists.

Worth bearing in mind that - for example - a degree educated, trained, commerical jet pilot on internal domestic routes in the USA can actually qualify for food stamps for the first couple of years of their career until their rank and experience increases. A London Tube driver can earn three times as much!

__________________

Marantz M-CR603 + AirPlay • Rega R3 loudspeakers • iPhone 5 32GB • iMac • Apple Airport Extreme 802.11n • Panasonic TX-L32D25B • Sony BDP-S390 • Ruark Audio R1 Deluxe • Humax HDR-Fox T2

idc
idc's picture
Offline
Joined: 2 Jan 2008
Posts: 7782
Re: Napster Profiteering?

UK holiday entitlements also tend to be better than in the US. New employees often start on no holidays outwith the public ones such as Labor Day, Thanksgiving and Christmas.


Of course we are just going to get more expensive again as fuel duties rise and VAT returns to 17.5 %.

__________________

Internet - laptop - DAC - amp - lots of headphones.

http://idc1966.blogspot.co.uk/

"A music lover will stop what he's doing and stay glued to a favorite piece of music even if it's coming over a 3" speaker or a public-address system..." - Ken Rockwell