Have your say & ask the experts!

Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

7 replies [Last post]
Clover2007
Clover2007's picture
Offline
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 2

Hi,

I want to buy my partner 1 of the above speakers for his birthday, but am really torn between which to go for (and need to order something today for it to arrive in time). I've spent weeks reading reviews for all but can't find them in one place so it's hard to do a comparison. Volume & clarity is really important - which would you recommend? I've found them all for a very similar price. Which do you recommend?

 Thanks for your advice!

andrewsw
andrewsw's picture
Offline
Joined: 9 Jan 2008
Posts: 4
Re: Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

I have an Aego M set-up in my living room as a second system, with an iPod dock sitting close to the sub (which has the input terminals). I'm delighted with it - just terrific sound for the money. Only negative is that it has no remote control for the volume. I also recommend the wall brackets for the little satellite speakers, which you have to order separately from Acoustic Energy - they are very discreet. Though not necessary, I upgraded the interconnect cable between the iPod and the sub and the sound improved significantly - so this little system really has great musical ability.

Clover2007
Clover2007's picture
Offline
Joined: 11 Jan 2008
Posts: 2
Re: Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

I went for the Aego M and am glad to hear you rate it. Which interconnect cable did you go for? Thanks.

andrewsw
andrewsw's picture
Offline
Joined: 9 Jan 2008
Posts: 4
Re: Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

I feel the Aego M tends to present music relatively 'brightly'. I started off with a QED Qunex 2, which is a good value for money, neutral sounding cable. Then I tried a couple of higher priced cables from my main system, simply out of interest. Both opened up the soundstage further and made a more compelling listen: First was a Merlin Chopin, which offered masses of top end detail - too fatiguing to listen to longterm, in my opinion, in this setup. Then tried an Ecosse Baton - terrific bass weight and more natural balance. It was such a good match, I now use this cable ongoing. It may seem like tremendous overkill, partnering the Aego M (~£100) with a cable of ~£70, but I feel the improvement in detail, separation and bass definintion is worth the extra outlay. It sounds terrific.

adamdunnet
adamdunnet's picture
Offline
Joined: 1 Aug 2008
Posts: 2
Re: Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

I recently purchased a 16GB ipod touch and was looking for a relatively good dock to compliment it. Can you suggest anything around £100-£150 with good sound quality and looks.

I have been looking at the Logic3 JiveBox and was wondering if it was any good?  

Clare Newsome
Clare Newsome's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jun 2007
Posts: 13733
Re: Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

Answer to that question (in short that the Logic3 isn't that great) in this thread, including link to better alternatives.

__________________

Group PR Manager - Computers Unlimited;

Former Group Editor of What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision and Whathifi.com

Twitter: @ClareNewsome

davesbeard
davesbeard's picture
Offline
Joined: 5 Aug 2008
Posts: 14
Re: Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

I have the Aego's as my PC speakers and they're cracking, the bass particuarly is impressive. Blends in very well with the overall sound. Good choice!

 Though the price seems to have gone up since i bought mine about 2 years ago. Are there different versions? A family friend has an identical looking set but the satellites felt much lighter.
 

AEJim
AEJim's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Nov 2008
Posts: 863
Re: Acoustic Energy Aego M, Logic3 Jivebox or iRythms A-211??

Sorry to dig up an old thread (was having my first browse round these parts in months - been very busy!), the difference in weight you felt in the satellites was due to a running change from zinc to aluminium - zinc being heavy, aluminium light. Acoustically there are differences as both materials have different resonances, but these are definitely small rather than outright changes - in listening we felt they offered similar performance with subtle changes in "flavour" - neither particularly outdoing the other.

__________________

Brand Manager, Acoustic Energy Ltd.