Have your say & ask the experts!

QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

20 replies [Last post]
pauled51
pauled51's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Nov 2009
Posts: 199

To the WHF team thanks for a great review on the new QAcoustics Q7000 style speakers. I have two questions for the review concerning their comments in the 'Reviewers Notes...5 days with the Q Acoustics Q7000':

1. Day 1: Quote - 'In moving the stand's ball joint into the 'wall-bracket position''. Can they indicate how much this added to the depth of the speakers?

2. Day 2: Quote - 'Undoing the subwoofer's single bolt to get to the input board causes the sub to fall apart like a clown's car'. What exactly does this mean, and exactly how much of the sub falls apart (sounds very disconcerting)? Also, I'm assuming that it is this panel when fitted that faces forward, so being that the input board is behind this panel is there any issue with cables being visible (I'm assuming they drop down behind the panel and beneath the unit for routing along the wall)?

Thanks,

Paul.

__________________

Panasonix TX-P46GT30B, Panasonic DMP-BDT110, Onkyo TX-NR609, Monitor Audio R90 HD10 (fronts/rears = R90HD; centre = R180HD; subwoofer = R370HD), Sky+HD

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Online
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29046
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

I'll seek clarification from the review team

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

Simon Lucas
Simon Lucas's picture
Offline
Joined: 5 Jun 2007
Posts: 1006
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

Hi Paul

With the stand deployed as a wall bracket, you can add around 5cm to the speakers' overall depth.

I must emphasise the sub is meant to come apart - but if you undo the bolt while it's standing on its feet it can topple. Best to lie it on its side before unscrewing the retaining bolt. The sub can face any way you want it too (that's part of the charm of its fixed-boundary configuration) and the cabling appears from the bottom of the cabinet, where it becomes visible.

__________________

Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision

pauled51
pauled51's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Nov 2009
Posts: 199
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

Simon,

Many thanks for a quick response.

Paul.

__________________

Panasonix TX-P46GT30B, Panasonic DMP-BDT110, Onkyo TX-NR609, Monitor Audio R90 HD10 (fronts/rears = R90HD; centre = R180HD; subwoofer = R370HD), Sky+HD

Amoose
Amoose's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Sep 2009
Posts: 10
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

This package appears to fit the bill for my requirements as I need something small yet can produce good musical quality as well as movie soundtracks. What I would like to know is

 

1. How do they compare with the likes of the B&W MT25 or KEF 3000?

 

2. What would be the best amp to partner this package?

 

Look forward to your reply

 

Cheers

 

Andy

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2567
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

how come the is no info on the Qacoustics Website about them? is the tewwter a ring tweeter like the ones on AE neo range?

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Online
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29046
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

ear wrote:
how come the is no info on the Qacoustics Website about them?

I guess Q Acoustics hasn't updated its site yet – maybe it doesn't have the huge dedicated team we have to keep this site as up to date as possible Wink

ear wrote:
is the tewwter a ring tweeter like the ones on AE neo range?

Yes, it is a 25mm ring radiator.

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2567
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

Thanks for that Andy. just strange they give you an exemplar do test before info on their site.they must be a winner.now if they'd put that same tweeter on the new 2000i range...

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

John Duncan
John Duncan's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jan 2008
Posts: 20436
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

ear wrote:

Andy

Cue dolly zoom...

__________________

CA StreamMagic 6  |  CA 751BD  |  CA 651A  |  PMC DB1i

Moderator. mail: john.duncan.whf at the mail of g dot com

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2567
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

haha didn'e even realize that..maybe just was thinking of some other character of some older  tv show..

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Online
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29046
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

ear wrote:
haha didn'e even realize that..maybe just was thinking of some other character of some older  tv show..

Nope, not a clue...

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

Amoose
Amoose's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Sep 2009
Posts: 10
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

I think the recent awards answered my first question but what about partnering with an amp. With the Onkyo 609 and the Q7000 both being award winners and both described as tonally neutral will this be a marriage made in heaven or do you have any other recommendations?

se7en
se7en's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Sep 2010
Posts: 44
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

Dear All,

 

I know this is the Q Acoustics Q7000 thread. I would just like to ask a couple of questions I am thinking of either Q7000 or Q2000 Range after initially thinking of the B&W MT25 now discontinued and price.

Given the choices of amp i want to go for would you think the Q Acoustic are the better speakers to go for??

What Amp would you partner the above speaker systems with out of yamaha rx-v671 or Onkyo Tx-nr609 or any other amp for that matter needs to be 3d ready though.

 

Many thanks

Newbie_Neil
Newbie_Neil's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2011
Posts: 22
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

Hi all,

 

Amoose wrote:
With the Onkyo 609 and the Q7000 both being award winners and both described as tonally neutral will this be a marriage made in heaven or do you have any other recommendations?

 

Anyone?

 

Thanks,

Neil

Steve Reichert ...
Steve Reichert   PR Manager   ArmourHome's picture
Offline
Joined: 5 Aug 2008
Posts: 103
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

Hello Neil,

I expect that pairing the new Q Acoustics 7000 speaker package with the Onkyo 609 would produce wonderful results because they are both clearly excellent products.

For academic interest the 7000s, like all very high quality loudspeakers are designed to be completely neutral in their sonic presentation and of course to work perfectly with every good amplifer. I'm completely confident we achieved this goal. Over the last couple of weeks, for the purposes of forthcoming reviews, I have set-up a number 7000 systems in magazine listening rooms and journalist's homes. Naturally they have been connected to a number of different AV amps (including an older Onkyo model) and have in my opinion, sounded simply brilliant on every occassion.

For purely academic interest, during the prolonged design process for the 7000s, we used NAD, Naim and Yamaha amplifiers.

Best regards,

Steve Reichert, PR Manager - Armour Home (Q Acoustics)

__________________

Steve Reichert - PR Manager, Armour Home

Newbie_Neil
Newbie_Neil's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Oct 2011
Posts: 22
RE: QAcoustics Q7000: Question for WHF Test Team

Hi Steve,

 

Thank you for taking the time to reply, it is much appreciated.

 

Thanks,

Neil