Have your say & ask the experts!

I was wrong about HDMI cables!

174 replies [Last post]
Sliced Bread
Sliced Bread's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Posts: 1378
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

bamindy wrote:

Maybe you should spend £40 on a USB cable and see if your digital camera photos look better too??  banging head against wall


I sit on the fence of this whole topic, but streaming data is not the same as copying a file.

__________________

Samsung PS50Q96HD (Screen) | CA 640c V2 (CD) | Pioneer BDP 320 (BluRay) | Onkyo 905 (Amp) | B&W CM8, CMC & CM1 (Speakers) | MA RS-12 (Sub) | Chord Odyssey 4 (Speaker Cable) | Van den Hul - The Name (Interconnects)

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

Sliced Bread wrote:
BenLaw wrote:

Sliced Bread wrote:
OK here’s a question: Let us say that HDMI certified cables are measured to less than 1-bit per billion. I am *assuming* that this is measured under the most flattering conditions possible for the cable (i.e. virtually no interference) as the manufacturer wants the certification. Does a cable that had exactly a 1-bit per billion error rate, have exactly the same error rate when stuffed under the hi-fi rack, curled up and crossing several power cables, a power block, speaker cables and interconnects many many times over in very close proximity as most of us stuff the cables out of site. I’m not sure how interference effects the signal of a HDMI cable, but it is likely that it will increase the error rates *another assumption*. *If* true then better insolation / booster chips etc may make a difference for some people, *if* their system is revealing enough *and* there are issues of interference. This is more a question than a statement.

 

http://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/certified-hdmi-cables.htm

 

I don't know how up to date that information is, but it seems to mean that any certified product may not in fact be individually certified, certainly at longer lengths 

 

Thing is, though, individual and random errors in data are just that, they aren't richer colours, deeper bass, an increased top end or whatever else was claimed. You see them in blocking / sparklies when they get too much. At most, one can imagine a single pixel during a single frame may be unpredictably the wrong colour. But none of the stuff that is claimed about these digital cables. 

What about sound though? Asyncronous USB is said to improve sound. I've not tested this at all myself so I'm on the fence, but it sounds reasonable to me that a cleaner digital signal would produce better results. I just don't know about picture. I do really wonder, how much of this is enviornemnt specific...you should see the underside of my rack...it's a mess doh! They don't move an inch either because I had to lift the rack up (40kg including kit), then drop it down on the cables to make it fit good job If there is cable interference, then it is in abundance under there. Fortunately I have a rubbish HD ready plasma which isn't revealing in the least, so if there is a problem...

 

Digital cables don't distinguish between sound and picture, it's all just data. So what I said applies equally to sound. Errors are by their nature random and unpredictable. If they are too bad, it results in cracks, pops and drop outs. No amount of random error equates to deeper bass or wider soundstage, both of which I think we're claims by the OP. Certainly that is the sort of thing commonly claimed. 

 

Asynchronous USB works by reducing jitter, although there are long standing and thorough studies that show jitter is undetectable by humans below a certain level, which any well constructed modern dac can achieve. 

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

bigboss
bigboss's picture
Offline
Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 9443
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

__________________

My Home Cinema  Pioneer KRP 500A, Yamaha RX-V1900, MA Radius R225HD LCR, R90HD rears, AW12 sub, Panasonic BD60, PS3, Boxee Box, Sky HD, Boxee Box, Logitech Harmony One, Logitech PS3 Adapter, Sonos ZP90

Bedroom Samsung UE32C6510, PS3 slim white, Apple TV, Sonos S5, Sonos ZP90, Audioengine 2, Oppo OPDV971H

Miscellaneous: Synology DS212J + 2 X WD Red 2TB drives, WD 1TB NAS, Sonos ZoneBridge, BT HH3 as modem & AirPort Extreme router

Sliced Bread
Sliced Bread's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Posts: 1378
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

BenLaw wrote:

Sliced Bread wrote:
BenLaw wrote:

Sliced Bread wrote:
OK here’s a question: Let us say that HDMI certified cables are measured to less than 1-bit per billion. I am *assuming* that this is measured under the most flattering conditions possible for the cable (i.e. virtually no interference) as the manufacturer wants the certification. Does a cable that had exactly a 1-bit per billion error rate, have exactly the same error rate when stuffed under the hi-fi rack, curled up and crossing several power cables, a power block, speaker cables and interconnects many many times over in very close proximity as most of us stuff the cables out of site. I’m not sure how interference effects the signal of a HDMI cable, but it is likely that it will increase the error rates *another assumption*. *If* true then better insolation / booster chips etc may make a difference for some people, *if* their system is revealing enough *and* there are issues of interference. This is more a question than a statement.

 

http://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/certified-hdmi-cables.htm

 

I don't know how up to date that information is, but it seems to mean that any certified product may not in fact be individually certified, certainly at longer lengths 

 

Thing is, though, individual and random errors in data are just that, they aren't richer colours, deeper bass, an increased top end or whatever else was claimed. You see them in blocking / sparklies when they get too much. At most, one can imagine a single pixel during a single frame may be unpredictably the wrong colour. But none of the stuff that is claimed about these digital cables. 

What about sound though? Asyncronous USB is said to improve sound. I've not tested this at all myself so I'm on the fence, but it sounds reasonable to me that a cleaner digital signal would produce better results. I just don't know about picture. I do really wonder, how much of this is enviornemnt specific...you should see the underside of my rack...it's a mess doh! They don't move an inch either because I had to lift the rack up (40kg including kit), then drop it down on the cables to make it fit good job If there is cable interference, then it is in abundance under there. Fortunately I have a rubbish HD ready plasma which isn't revealing in the least, so if there is a problem...

 

Digital cables don't distinguish between sound and picture, it's all just data. So what I said applies equally to sound. Errors are by their nature random and unpredictable. If they are too bad, it results in cracks, pops and drop outs. No amount of random error equates to deeper bass or wider soundstage, both of which I think we're claims by the OP. Certainly that is the sort of thing commonly claimed. 

 

Asynchronous USB works by reducing jitter, although there are long standing and thorough studies that show jitter is undetectable by humans below a certain level, which any well constructed modern dac can achieve. 


If that is the case then I should be hearing such symptoms from time to time in the sound as I should be receiving an error every second if the OP is correct, but I've never heard this ever. Only in 'really' bad signals when strreaming from you tube or something have I seen anythinig like this. I believe this is not quite the same thing. I can't really believe that I have never had an error in the stream, so I imagine the manifestation of an error may be something else.

Maybe the player detects the error and leaves the information out, or maybe in the case of audio the dac somehow tries to smooth it out...I just don't know. I've not seen enough facts to make a judgement either way.

What you say maybe true, but I'm keeping an open mind on this front.

I think I'd need to see / hear it all for myself to be sure.

__________________

Samsung PS50Q96HD (Screen) | CA 640c V2 (CD) | Pioneer BDP 320 (BluRay) | Onkyo 905 (Amp) | B&W CM8, CMC & CM1 (Speakers) | MA RS-12 (Sub) | Chord Odyssey 4 (Speaker Cable) | Van den Hul - The Name (Interconnects)

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

Sliced Bread wrote:
BenLaw wrote:

Sliced Bread wrote:
BenLaw wrote:

Sliced Bread wrote:
OK here’s a question: Let us say that HDMI certified cables are measured to less than 1-bit per billion. I am *assuming* that this is measured under the most flattering conditions possible for the cable (i.e. virtually no interference) as the manufacturer wants the certification. Does a cable that had exactly a 1-bit per billion error rate, have exactly the same error rate when stuffed under the hi-fi rack, curled up and crossing several power cables, a power block, speaker cables and interconnects many many times over in very close proximity as most of us stuff the cables out of site. I’m not sure how interference effects the signal of a HDMI cable, but it is likely that it will increase the error rates *another assumption*. *If* true then better insolation / booster chips etc may make a difference for some people, *if* their system is revealing enough *and* there are issues of interference. This is more a question than a statement.

 

http://www.bluejeanscable.com/articles/certified-hdmi-cables.htm

 

I don't know how up to date that information is, but it seems to mean that any certified product may not in fact be individually certified, certainly at longer lengths 

 

Thing is, though, individual and random errors in data are just that, they aren't richer colours, deeper bass, an increased top end or whatever else was claimed. You see them in blocking / sparklies when they get too much. At most, one can imagine a single pixel during a single frame may be unpredictably the wrong colour. But none of the stuff that is claimed about these digital cables. 

What about sound though? Asyncronous USB is said to improve sound. I've not tested this at all myself so I'm on the fence, but it sounds reasonable to me that a cleaner digital signal would produce better results. I just don't know about picture. I do really wonder, how much of this is enviornemnt specific...you should see the underside of my rack...it's a mess doh! They don't move an inch either because I had to lift the rack up (40kg including kit), then drop it down on the cables to make it fit good job If there is cable interference, then it is in abundance under there. Fortunately I have a rubbish HD ready plasma which isn't revealing in the least, so if there is a problem...

 

Digital cables don't distinguish between sound and picture, it's all just data. So what I said applies equally to sound. Errors are by their nature random and unpredictable. If they are too bad, it results in cracks, pops and drop outs. No amount of random error equates to deeper bass or wider soundstage, both of which I think we're claims by the OP. Certainly that is the sort of thing commonly claimed. 

 

Asynchronous USB works by reducing jitter, although there are long standing and thorough studies that show jitter is undetectable by humans below a certain level, which any well constructed modern dac can achieve. 

If that is the case then I should be hearing such symptoms from time to time in the sound as I should be receiving an error every second if the OP is correct, but I've never heard this ever. Only in 'really' bad signals when strreaming from you tube or something have I seen anythinig like this. I believe this is not quite the same thing. I can't really believe that I have never had an error in the stream, so I imagine the manifestation of an error may be something else. Maybe the player detects the error and leaves the information out, or maybe in the case of audio the dac somehow tries to smooth it out...I just don't know. I've not seen enough facts to make a judgement either way. What you say maybe true, but I'm keeping an open mind on this front. I think I'd need to see / hear it all for myself to be sure.

 

Exactly, one error in a billion or whatever does not manifest itself in an audible way. Only when there are lots of errors, eg if your cable is broken or where you get aerial drop out will errors manifest themselves in an audible or visible way. Whether it's so few errors you can't tell or so many that you can, errors in data do not - cannot - manifest themselves in consistent ways such as deeper blacks or lower bass. 

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

bigboss
bigboss's picture
Offline
Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 9443
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

__________________

My Home Cinema  Pioneer KRP 500A, Yamaha RX-V1900, MA Radius R225HD LCR, R90HD rears, AW12 sub, Panasonic BD60, PS3, Boxee Box, Sky HD, Boxee Box, Logitech Harmony One, Logitech PS3 Adapter, Sonos ZP90

Bedroom Samsung UE32C6510, PS3 slim white, Apple TV, Sonos S5, Sonos ZP90, Audioengine 2, Oppo OPDV971H

Miscellaneous: Synology DS212J + 2 X WD Red 2TB drives, WD 1TB NAS, Sonos ZoneBridge, BT HH3 as modem & AirPort Extreme router

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

 

I see, you gave him the equivalent of a chip to, er, boost his signal. 

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

bigboss
bigboss's picture
Offline
Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 9443
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

 

I see, you gave him the equivalent of a chip to, er, boost his signal. 

excellent!

__________________

My Home Cinema  Pioneer KRP 500A, Yamaha RX-V1900, MA Radius R225HD LCR, R90HD rears, AW12 sub, Panasonic BD60, PS3, Boxee Box, Sky HD, Boxee Box, Logitech Harmony One, Logitech PS3 Adapter, Sonos ZP90

Bedroom Samsung UE32C6510, PS3 slim white, Apple TV, Sonos S5, Sonos ZP90, Audioengine 2, Oppo OPDV971H

Miscellaneous: Synology DS212J + 2 X WD Red 2TB drives, WD 1TB NAS, Sonos ZoneBridge, BT HH3 as modem & AirPort Extreme router

duaplex
duaplex's picture
Offline
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 823
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

FrankHarveyHiFi wrote:

I had been testing out a more expensive HDMI cable over the past few months, and I'd recently put my normal one back in (Chord Active Silver Plus). I had meant to try a few familiar Blurays but didn't get round to it last week. Now too much time has passed, so I think I'll need to loan it again...

I was recently talking to Audioquest and they tell me they won't willing.y use any 'active' components in their HDMI cables as their testing found that it actually degraded quality. I haven't been into the details of this yet, but I'm just passing that on for those who are interested. If I recall correctly, Audioquest are working on longer cable runs that won't need an active component in order for it to work properly.

Whats your opinion on this David, as a man that works in this sector.

__________________

Panasonic 65" 3D TV (P65VT50), Pioneer LX83, CA, Azur 751BD, PS3, Water Cooled Xbox 360 (Modded), Nintendo Wii U, Sky HD+, i7 PC overclocked with 6850 HD Radeon, CM8 Fronts (Bi-Amped), CMC Center (Bi-Wired), DS3 Dipoles, PV1 Sub. Van Den Hul M.C. Snowtrack >Halogen Free< wiring, Chord Active Silver HDMI's, Cabridge Audio AUD700 Analogues Interconnects, QED Signature Subwoofer cables, Chunky Monkey custom oak AV cabinet.

relocated
relocated's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Posts: 812
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

 

I see, you gave him the equivalent of a chip to, er, boost his signal. 

 

excellent!     good job   

__________________

Apple Lossless - ATV3 - AVI ADM 40  or  Marantz CD50SE (modded] - AVI ADM 40

also ATV3 into AVI ADM 9T [my wife's system] and Grado SR80i

duaplex
duaplex's picture
Offline
Joined: 22 Feb 2011
Posts: 823
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

 

I see, you gave him the equivalent of a chip to, er, boost his signal. 

excellent!

It's true and like I said my wife who was unaware of the test and the fact i swapped cables spotted it.  So does that mean the plecebo is extended to her telepathicaly Smile

__________________

Panasonic 65" 3D TV (P65VT50), Pioneer LX83, CA, Azur 751BD, PS3, Water Cooled Xbox 360 (Modded), Nintendo Wii U, Sky HD+, i7 PC overclocked with 6850 HD Radeon, CM8 Fronts (Bi-Amped), CMC Center (Bi-Wired), DS3 Dipoles, PV1 Sub. Van Den Hul M.C. Snowtrack >Halogen Free< wiring, Chord Active Silver HDMI's, Cabridge Audio AUD700 Analogues Interconnects, QED Signature Subwoofer cables, Chunky Monkey custom oak AV cabinet.

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

duaplex wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

 

I see, you gave him the equivalent of a chip to, er, boost his signal. 

excellent!

It's true and like I said my wife who was unaware of the test and the fact i swapped cables spotted it.  So does that mean the plecebo is extended to her telepathicaly Smile

 

You never did answer my questions about the detail of what 'testing skyfall' meant. 

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

fr0g
fr0g's picture
Online
Joined: 7 Jan 2008
Posts: 2133
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

duaplex wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

 

I see, you gave him the equivalent of a chip to, er, boost his signal. 

excellent!

It's true and like I said my wife who was unaware of the test and the fact i swapped cables spotted it.  So does that mean the plecebo is extended to her telepathicaly Smile

No, but it can mean one or more of many things.

1. She knew you had spent money on an "upgraded" cable. In that case her testament is invalid.

2. She saw you fiddling with the TV or something similar and in those cases her testament is invalid.

3. You inadvertently changed something else. Maybe a mode on TV / BR or some furniture, curtains, etc, thus rendering the point moot.

4. You are lying,

 

There could be other reasons which I haven't thought of, but HDMI cables only differ in that they function, or don't, or are on the way not to, resulting in drop-outs in audio, obvious artifacts in the picture etc. I have chucked a couple out myself, and always buy from a seller on ebay now. They are premium grade and cost around £10-£20 depending on length.

 

 

 

__________________

“Out beyond ideas of wrong and  right, there is a field.

I'll meet you there."

 

 

Sliced Bread
Sliced Bread's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Jul 2010
Posts: 1378
RE: I was wrong about HDMI cables!

fr0g wrote:

duaplex wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

bigboss wrote:

I once cured impotence in a man within 2 days by prescribing multivitamin capsules to be taken with a glass of milk. It's true.

 

??

Smile

It's very relevant to the discussion - the power of suggestion, and how powerful a placebo can be! 

 

I see, you gave him the equivalent of a chip to, er, boost his signal. 

excellent!

It's true and like I said my wife who was unaware of the test and the fact i swapped cables spotted it.  So does that mean the plecebo is extended to her telepathicaly Smile

No, but it can mean one or more of many things.

1. She knew you had spent money on an "upgraded" cable. In that case her testament is invalid.

2. She saw you fiddling with the TV or something similar and in those cases her testament is invalid.

3. You inadvertently changed something else. Maybe a mode on TV / BR or some furniture, curtains, etc, thus rendering the point moot.

4. You are lying,

 

There could be other reasons which I haven't thought of, but HDMI cables only differ in that they function, or don't, or are on the way not to, resulting in drop-outs in audio, obvious artifacts in the picture etc. I have chucked a couple out myself, and always buy from a seller on ebay now. They are premium grade and cost around £10-£20 depending on length.

 

 

 


Or maybe he is correct. You were not at the testing.
There do not seem to be any firm conclusions on this subject..alot of educated guesses, but no firm conclusions.

__________________

Samsung PS50Q96HD (Screen) | CA 640c V2 (CD) | Pioneer BDP 320 (BluRay) | Onkyo 905 (Amp) | B&W CM8, CMC & CM1 (Speakers) | MA RS-12 (Sub) | Chord Odyssey 4 (Speaker Cable) | Van den Hul - The Name (Interconnects)