I am definitely convinced my hard drive sounds better. So is there a way to set up a home network with my blueray player with out using it as the main display for titles of Albums & artist & album covers. Cause i can only do this right now through my main tele through the Oppo blueray palyer.
Would the all mighty Squeezebox play the part or may i need something else.. Or is there any harddrive network streamers with displays..? Any help welcome.
No rules. If it sounds good to you it sounds Right!!.Transpor:t . Oppo BDP-105EU Blue ray player. DAC:Musical Fidelity V90. AMP: Arcam AVR450. SPEAKER'S: Boston acoustics M340.
The Oppo is not a dedicated CD player, so the laser is not that good. A dedicated CD player will sound a lot better due to less jitter.
That must be wrong, sorry. Aside from being by general consesnsus one of the best bits of kit currently made, HiFi News reported on the Oppo 105 in January 2013 and said: "Jitter remains vanishingly low via disc-based media at <120psec...".
Your assertion doesn't really stack up against that, does it?
Hi-Fi: Krell KAV-300cd, Michell TecnoDec/RB250/Grado Prestige Black1, KAV-300i amp, Transparent balanced interconnects and bi-wire to Sonus faber Concerto grand piano speakers, Nakamichi ZX-7 cassette deck, Logitech Squeezebox Touch, Hitachi FT-5500 and Sony S570ES tuners, BCD Engineering stand, RA Powerlink, Chord powerchord, Grado SR60i cans.
AV: Sony Bravia KDL-32EX503 telly, BDP-S370 player with QED HDMI. Currently unused: Denon AVR-1705, DVD-1710, KEF KHT1005.2
Am sorry but i can only go by ears.. May be the sound from my hard drive is coloured, & I may like it better.. It may be the case.... Also looking to get my music all in one place. but right now i need someone to help with display setup.
Hard drives do sound better and this is one the key factors of why people are moving from CDs to computer based playback. CD transports are rotating mechanisms that create vibrations which negatively impact sound quality. Also when laser reads a CD it may create errors. Very expensive CD transports/players try to eliminate these challenges thru various approaches, but even with lots of money put into engineering this doesn't solve the problem 100%. On the other hand, reading data from HDD is error free and there are no moving parts and much less vibration, so a HDD does the same job at much lower cost. Obviously not every computer audio setup is the same and the results may be different, but in general HDDs are better.
Dedicated Win7 Music PC -> Audiolab M-DAC -> Plinius 9200 -> ATC SCM 40; Furutech GT2 USB Cable, Oyaide Interconnects and mains cords; Kimber Kable 8tc speaker cables
Totally agree.......This is fleshing out what I was hinting at earlier.
"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again." André Gide
No moving parts in a hard disk? You are sadly misinformed.
He was probably thinking of the streamer end......as I was.
Or he meant SSD. Which will hopefully get a bit cheaper very soon.
TV room : Samsung 60" plasma-ATV3, -AVI ADM40, DM5 in 4.0,/Sonos ZP90,, Sky using Sonos for On Demand, PS4, Sony BDP S570 thru a Yamaha RXV3067.
HiFi : Sonos ZP90 - AVI ADM9 RSS + AVI SUB
Bedrooms : 2 x Sonos Play 3
IPad Air for Sonos & Spotify / AKG K551
Even a cheap cdp is capable of a bit perfect output. This has been proven. Same with dvd and blu ray players, as long as they don't resample the output to 48khz. Don't let silly little things like facts get in the way though! The only time a hdd has an advantage is with scratched discs, where the ripping software can make multiple attempts at getting a bit perfect rip.
Synology NAS + ATV2 > ADM9RS
Also a HDD will fail, sooner or later it'll happen.
CDPs can soldier on for ages.
I don't have a CDP btw unless you count the Denon.
The Oppo is not a dedicated CD player, so the laser is not that good. A dedicated CD player will sound a lot better due to less jitter. If you want even better sound upgrade your external hard drive to a SSD and hook it up with a premium USB cable.
It was widely acknowledged that many early DVD players were rubbish at playing CDs - this was my experience from a Pioneer player as well over a decade ago. And the model I exchanged it for would have horrified many here by its explicitly bright sound. The difference between CD and DVD decks was partially down to their lasers operating at different light frequencies - early DVD lasers were simply not designed to get the best out of CDs. And in a good CD player, as everyone knows, the DAC is only half the story. Obviously technology has progressed since as manifested in good universal BD players now.
Arcam Solo Mini/Monitor Audio RX1/Cambridge Audio 751BD/Samsung 37” LCD
I don't think I was misinformed, please go back to me post where I said 'much less vibration', I fact an SSD has no moving parts at all, and laptor sized 2.5 HDDs are almost silent and vibrate just little. Also, an important consideration for computer audio playback is to move HDD away from the transport's chassis, either by externally attaching it or by using network and NAS.
you are sadly misinformed if you believe that any vibration within a hard drive will have any effect on sound quality. Don't believe me - try playing back from an external hard drive and start moving the drive around, nudge it, make it vibrate - it will have no effect on the sound whatsoever. try it. the worst that will happen is that the music may stop if the heads skip.
Yes rightly so am currenlty using SSD drives.. I for one let my ears decide for me.. My ears tell me the ssd sounds far better... Simples.
© 2014 Haymarket Publishing