Have your say & ask the experts!

WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

169 replies [Last post]
CnoEvil
CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 8836
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Yeah, but which ones have you heard doing all this? Same with timing. does an amp really have influence on this? In fact, does any component? Can we name and shame?

What's the point as it's so personal, and you only end up in a row, or upsetting someone.

It is not a shock to people on here that I like Class A and Valves, a few AB amps and even fewer Class D amps.

If you want to get a taste of the way I like an amp to sound, try to get a listen to the AMS 35i or even better Primo / AMS 50.

I'm not a great fan of the Naim sound, but they do have good PRaT.....which gives "life" to the music.

__________________

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."  André Gide

manicm
manicm's picture
Offline
Joined: 1 May 2008
Posts: 2145
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Yeah, but which ones have you heard doing all this? Same with timing. does an amp really have influence on this? In fact, does any component? Can we name and shame?

From my experience an amp or source can affect this.

__________________

Arcam Solo Mini/Monitor Audio RX1/Cambridge Audio 751BD/Samsung 37” LCD

Overdose
Overdose's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Feb 2008
Posts: 2583
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

Are distortion figures not printed in most hifi product specifications?

Measurements will show distortion or artifacts, but wether or not you can actually hear and identify them is another matter entirely, which is where 'audibly transparent' comes in.

__________________

Mac mini > AVI ADM9Ts

altruistic.lemon
altruistic.lemon's picture
Offline
Joined: 25 Jul 2011
Posts: 1050
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

Nah, CNO, swapped the Naim for an Electrocompaniet, Class A jobby, then sold that for the Pioneer. Really not much difference if any. Had Musical Fidelity before, in Oz, don't rate them.

In the end, it's the speakers that make the difference, amps just peripheral. Whoops, off now, b**ger.

CnoEvil
CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 8836
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Nah, CNO, swapped the Naim for an Electrocompaniet, Class A jobby, then sold that for the Pioneer. Really not much difference if any. Had Musical Fidelity before, in Oz, don't rate them.

In the end, it's the speakers that make the difference, amps just peripheral. Whoops, off now, b**ger.

AL, you're all upside down and the wrong way round.  Tongue

__________________

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."  André Gide

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

CnoEvil wrote:

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Nah, CNO, swapped the Naim for an Electrocompaniet, Class A jobby, then sold that for the Pioneer. Really not much difference if any. Had Musical Fidelity before, in Oz, don't rate them.

In the end, it's the speakers that make the difference, amps just peripheral. Whoops, off now, b**ger.

AL, you're all upside down and the wrong way round.  Tongue

 

Either that, or modern country, modern ideas  Smile

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

CnoEvil
CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 8836
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

BenLaw wrote:

CnoEvil wrote:

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Nah, CNO, swapped the Naim for an Electrocompaniet, Class A jobby, then sold that for the Pioneer. Really not much difference if any. Had Musical Fidelity before, in Oz, don't rate them.

In the end, it's the speakers that make the difference, amps just peripheral. Whoops, off now, b**ger.

AL, you're all upside down and the wrong way round.  Tongue

Either that, or modern country, modern ideas  Smile

......and moved over here!  shifty

 

__________________

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."  André Gide

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

CnoEvil wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

CnoEvil wrote:

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Nah, CNO, swapped the Naim for an Electrocompaniet, Class A jobby, then sold that for the Pioneer. Really not much difference if any. Had Musical Fidelity before, in Oz, don't rate them.

In the end, it's the speakers that make the difference, amps just peripheral. Whoops, off now, b**ger.

AL, you're all upside down and the wrong way round.  Tongue

Either that, or modern country, modern ideas  Smile

......and moved over here!  shifty

 

 

Probably for the great weather...

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

BenLaw
BenLaw's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Nov 2010
Posts: 4102
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

Or the quality burgers. 

__________________

HiFi   /   A/V   /   Bedroom

CnoEvil
CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 8836
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

BenLaw wrote:

CnoEvil wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

CnoEvil wrote:

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Nah, CNO, swapped the Naim for an Electrocompaniet, Class A jobby, then sold that for the Pioneer. Really not much difference if any. Had Musical Fidelity before, in Oz, don't rate them.

In the end, it's the speakers that make the difference, amps just peripheral. Whoops, off now, b**ger.

AL, you're all upside down and the wrong way round.  Tongue

Either that, or modern country, modern ideas  Smile

......and moved over here!  shifty

Probably for the great weather...

Wait till he tries Ireland! 

__________________

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."  André Gide

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29046
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

altruistic.lemon wrote:
b**ger.

Beef or horse?

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

the record spot
the record spot's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 8007
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Yeah, but which ones have you heard doing all this? Same with timing. does an amp really have influence on this? In fact, does any component? Can we name and shame?

 

I've always thought PRaT was a joke on the back of the acronym.  I've never yet heard an amp, or source, affect "timing".  What timing is going to go exactly?  Will the drum beats be out of sync?  Will the guitar be a beat behind?  Will the conductor suddenly lose the orchestra?  Nope...never anything like that yet. 

__________________

 

Onkyo TX-8050 / Tannoy Revolution DC4 / Marantz SA7001-KI / Apple TV 3 / Sony PS3 320Gb / Denon DVD-3930

steve_1979
steve_1979's picture
Offline
Joined: 14 Jul 2010
Posts: 1992
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

Ketan Bharadia wrote:
By transparency we mean the ability of the amplifier to let the music signal through unchanged.

So basically what you mean by 'transparency' is low distortion?

 

Does this mean that when WHF describes an amplifier in a review as being 'transparent' it will have a measurably lower THD than an amplifier that isn't described as being 'transparent'?

__________________

PC > AVI Neutron Five 2.1

32GB Sony NWZ-A846 Walkman > Westone UM3x

moon
moon's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Nov 2011
Posts: 871
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

steve_1979 wrote:

Ketan Bharadia wrote:
By transparency we mean the ability of the amplifier to let the music signal through unchanged.

So basically what you mean by 'transparency' is low distortion?

 

Does this mean that when WHF describes an amplifier in a review as being 'transparent' it will have a measurably lower THD than an amplifier that isn't described as being 'transparent'?

well if thats the case, the Marantz has very low THD.

__________________

 

MeanandGreen
MeanandGreen's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Dec 2012
Posts: 79
RE: WHF review , lack of transparency? Aye

the record spot wrote:

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Yeah, but which ones have you heard doing all this? Same with timing. does an amp really have influence on this? In fact, does any component? Can we name and shame?

 

I've always thought PRaT was a joke on the back of the acronym.  I've never yet heard an amp, or source, affect "timing".  What timing is going to go exactly?  Will the drum beats be out of sync?  Will the guitar be a beat behind?  Will the conductor suddenly lose the orchestra?  Nope...never anything like that yet. 

Indeed I think the whole "timing" thing is nonsense. Timing of individual instruments on a recording cannot be affected.

__________________

NAD C326BEE Amplifier, Sony CDP-XB930 CD Player, Pioneer PDR-509 CD Recorder, Arcam irDock with iPod Touch, B&W DM 601 S3 speakers, Jamo 20"Stands, Revolver Rack, QED cabling throughout, Sennheiser HD 518 & HD 565 Ovation Headphones, Beyerdynamic DTX-101iE ear buds.