129 posts / 0 new
Last post
altruistic.lemon's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 7 hours ago
Joined: 25/07/2011 - 09:18
Posts: 1865
RE: Vintage gear

BigH, you asked what was a balanced, musical system, which the one I've suggested is. The 356BEE is easily powerful enough - all NAD amps can ramp up the power considerably for short bursts, it's one of their design features.

BigH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 6 min ago
Joined: 29/12/2012 - 12:31
Posts: 3488
RE: Vintage gear

altruistic.lemon wrote:

BigH, you asked what was a balanced, musical system, which the one I've suggested is. The 356BEE is easily powerful enough - all NAD amps can ramp up the power considerably for short bursts, it's one of their design features.

 

I agree its one that maybe good but its not for everone, I suspect that for 90% of people it won't be suitable. The other problem is getting to hear Maggies in this country. But I agree if you have the room it should to be considered.

chebby's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 02/06/2008 - 09:40
Posts: 15812
RE: Vintage gear

BigH wrote:

altruistic.lemon wrote:

BigH wrote:

I have heard lots of £2-£3K systems, to me most of them had problems, many were unbalanced and unmusical, you make it sound so easy to get a good system for £2K.

So what would your recommended £2K systems be?

Sorry for the hijack, but Magnepan MG 12/NAD 356BEE/NAD CD player or Sony Blu-ray.

 

But Maggies need some space and the right size room, so maybe not suitable for many people. Also I hear they benefit from a powerful amp.

The manufacturer recommends a class A/B type amp with good current delivery and a good quality power supply.  As far as power is concerned they are non-committal and merely report that they get feedback from customers happy with everything from 50 to 1000 watt amps.

They are happy to leave it up to the customer to research for themselves how much power they need for their size of room and volume requirements.

Their most pertinent comment is this one...

"You can get a lot of free advice in the chat rooms on the internet. Most of it is of very little value (or misleading). Often, their power recommendations are influenced by their listening habits and room conditions. If they have a strong opinion of what you need for power, take it with a grain of salt."

Amen.

BigH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 6 min ago
Joined: 29/12/2012 - 12:31
Posts: 3488
RE: Vintage gear

davedotco wrote:

I have no doubt that you can put together a technically very decent system in the £2-3k region and in fact £2k-ish was what I was budgeting for my playback system last year when I thought, erroniously, that I was going to be able to to buy a new setup.

What would you suggest for £2K?

davedotco's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 38 min ago
Joined: 24/04/2013 - 10:02
Posts: 3022
RE: Vintage gear

BigH wrote:

davedotco wrote:

I have no doubt that you can put together a technically very decent system in the £2-3k region and in fact £2k-ish was what I was budgeting for my playback system last year when I thought, erroniously, that I was going to be able to to buy a new setup.

What would you suggest for £2K?

Bear in mind that I am talking about a playback system only, just dac, amp and speakers.

I was seriously considering a famous product from 'the dark side' as one option and more conventionally, looking to see what I could get, in budget, that would drive a pair of SF Venere 1.5s that I could get for about £1k at the time. Rather a fancied a go with the XTZ D100 but not easily arranged.

Anyway swimbo decided to turn our world upside down by buying a new flat (instead of renting) and 'my' £2k got spent on decorating and furniture.

Um's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 17/06/2013 - 14:33
Posts: 110
RE: Vintage gear

matthewpiano wrote:

I've got to be honest, I'm pretty disillusioned with modern, affordable hi-fi.  There is always some feeling of it not quite being 'right' which I don't get with some of the vintage gear I've used - stuff like old Pioneer SA and Sansui AU amps, even the lower end stuff.

Anyone else lean towards the vintage stuff?

 

Am I missing something here? This post seems to be in direct contradiction to everything you've ever posted about budget hifi. Singin it's praises etc.

 

matthewpiano's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 40 min ago
Joined: 23/11/2007 - 22:23
Posts: 8167
RE: Vintage gear

Well, it isn't in direct contradiction to the amount of times I've swapped my kit.  I do find a lot of the kit impressive initially, but over longer listening sessions the weaknesses only become more apparent.  I'm not saying its rubbish now - only that it doesn't satisfy me musically over a longer period of time.

lindsayt's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 8 hours ago
Joined: 08/04/2011 - 01:18
Posts: 1094
RE: Vintage gear

BigH wrote:

Speakers have developed quite a bit over the last 20 years, just look at the new driver materials, different shape of cabinets, more active speakers available. What other parts do you mean? Amps and cd players are hardly changing.

Modern driver materials, cabinet shapes. Have these developments resulted in better sounding speakers when you take into account the widespread abondonment of sealed cabinets, large bass drivers, compression drivers? Or is it more a case of 2 steps forwards and 3 steps backwards?

 

I don't think that there are more active speakers available today than there were in the 1960's. Not amongst the higher end of the market Not as a proportion of speakers available. Every high end speaker I've come across from the 1960's - apart from Quad ESL 57's - has been designed to be easily converted from passive to active to passive again.

 

The proof of the pudding is in the listening. Compare cherry picked vintage speakers against cherry picked modern speakers and you can decide for yourself whether modern driver materials and cabinet shapes really have resulted in better sounding speakers or not.

 

chebby's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 02/06/2008 - 09:40
Posts: 15812
RE: Vintage gear

matthewpiano wrote:

Well, it isn't in direct contradiction to the amount of times I've swapped my kit.  I do find a lot of the kit impressive initially, but over longer listening sessions the weaknesses only become more apparent.  I'm not saying its rubbish now - only that it doesn't satisfy me musically over a longer period of time.

I doubt anything ever will. Whatever your budget. You are just unfortunate in that way. 

 

davedotco's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 38 min ago
Joined: 24/04/2013 - 10:02
Posts: 3022
RE: Vintage gear

chebby wrote:

matthewpiano wrote:

Well, it isn't in direct contradiction to the amount of times I've swapped my kit.  I do find a lot of the kit impressive initially, but over longer listening sessions the weaknesses only become more apparent.  I'm not saying its rubbish now - only that it doesn't satisfy me musically over a longer period of time.

I doubt anything ever will. Whatever your budget. You are just unfortunate in that way. 

Maybe it is not the specific components that fail to satisfy but the kind of system you are buying.

'He who shall not be named' puts forward the view that all conventional passive systems are flawed by a combination of poor crossover design in the speakers and under powered amplification.

Maybe, stripped of all the attitude and hype, he has something there, certainly I find that there is an underlying 'sameness' to the budget systems that I hear that is not present in many active speakers I have tried. Active speakers may well have their issues, but sounding like budget passive systems is not one of them.

 

Mathew;

I believe you have 'dabbled' with the 'dark side' in the past and given much of what you have said in your recent posts, I strongly urge you to give it a serious go.

 

altruistic.lemon's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 7 hours ago
Joined: 25/07/2011 - 09:18
Posts: 1865
RE: Vintage gear

DDC, you do go on about nothing sometimes! The problem is assuming that anything other than speakers is going to make a big difference, and unfortunately matthewpiano has apparently putting his money into budget sources and amp which means he has not been able to buy good quality speakers.

Had he bought something like Neats, the Sonus Fabers or whatever and coupled them with an appropriately powerful but budet amp, this thread would not have existed. Really, put the money into the bits that make the sound, that's where it is, the amps have little to do with it as long as they are in spec.

Blackdawn's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 6 days ago
Joined: 07/05/2010 - 20:37
Posts: 776
RE: Vintage gear

Always interesting to read on here what Matthewpiano is going to pick next. Good luck with the search. What about a headphone system? - eliminates problems with outside noise, wider, more linear frequency response, cheaper, forgetting the system -concentrating on the music etc or and all in one with no box swapping needed?

Covenanter's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 21 min ago
Joined: 20/07/2012 - 10:16
Posts: 1204
RE: Vintage gear RE: Vintage gear

BigH wrote:

Covenanter wrote:

Matthew is absolutely right in saying that it's the music that's important.  I get the feeling that for many posters to this forum it's the kit that's important.  I suspect that if you spend say £2k on your hifi setup (and avoid stupid mismatches) you are going to get something that is perfectly good at reproducing music.  After that you can doubtless get improvements but they will cost you a lot and get you very little.

Chris

 

I have heard lots of £2-£3K systems, to me most of them had problems, many were unbalanced and unmusical, you make it sound so easy to get a good system for £2K. 

So what would your recommended £2K systems be?

Well I'm not a hifi expert in that I've not heard loads of different pieces of kit.  Some of the people who post here seem to have a view on everything under the sun and frankly I don't know how they find the time to have heard all this kit, they must do almost nothing else!  So when I wanted a system last year I read a lot of reviews and studied the postings to some forums, including this one, drew up a shortlist with the budget I was willing to spend and found a dealer who had the stuff on that list.  My criterion, and it was the only one, was did it reproduce music acceptably close to the sound I hear in a concert hall.  The budget was up to £2k but with a contingency that I needed a good pair of headphones as I live in an apartment block and late night listening cannot be on speakers. 

After an extended audition I came down to a Marantz CD6004/PM6004 combination driving Kef Q500s.  Most of the audition was concentrated on the speakers as I found the Marantz kit to be the most neutral (the old "wire with gain" cliche).  I found this combination capable of producing what I wanted and that impression has been sustained over a period of some 12 months.  I was listening to the classic Aeolian Quartet recording of early Haydn String Quartets this morning and the sound was close to my aural memory of hearing this music in the Wigmore Hall some 30+ years ago.  To complete the system I bought some AKG K702 headphones after reading the reviews on the headphone forum here (which are excellent) but also after looking at reviews elsewhere from mainly classical music lovers.  They are also excellent albeit a bit too revealing in some live recordings where you can almost see the person unwrapping their toffee in the 3rd row!  All in all, what with cables and other accessories, I spent less than £2k and have what I wanted, a system that reproduces music acceptably close to the sound I hear in a concert hall.

I did think of updating it all this year as I happened to have the money but I said to myself "Hey it's very good and you need (ie would like) a new car" so I bought a car instead.  :grin:

Chris

plastic penguin's picture
Offline
Last seen: 33 min 8 sec ago
Joined: 28/04/2008 - 10:56
Posts: 16169
RE: Vintage gear

Would be interesting to know what other interests Matthew has?

davedotco's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 hours 38 min ago
Joined: 24/04/2013 - 10:02
Posts: 3022
RE: Vintage gear

altruistic.lemon wrote:

DDC, you do go on about nothing sometimes! The problem is assuming that anything other than speakers is going to make a big difference, and unfortunately matthewpiano has apparently putting his money into budget sources and amp which means he has not been able to buy good quality speakers.

Had he bought something like Neats, the Sonus Fabers or whatever and coupled them with an appropriately powerful but budet amp, this thread would not have existed. Really, put the money into the bits that make the sound, that's where it is, the amps have little to do with it as long as they are in spec.

I have spent a lot of time with both these brands and my experience is exactly the opposite. Both require good quality amplification to give of their very best.

Concise enough for you?

Pages

Log in or register to post comments