53 posts / 0 new
Last post
Overdose's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 54 min ago
Joined: 08/02/2008 - 18:23
Posts: 3361
RE: Tannoy Precision 6.2 review

BigH wrote:

The problem I have with a reference system is what if the speakers don't suit the amp.? then the amp is no good? If they had only used the ATC with the Arcam A19 amp which was not a great match then it would not have got such a good review. Also I don't think they do use the same ref. system all the time, I seen several different systems quoted in reviews. Also why play all different sorts of music how does that compare when using different system, it all seems a bit inconsist to me.  

I seem to remember a list of the equipment used and I recall Bryston being mentioned. I'm pretty sure that whatever is used it would (should) be a lot less pedestrian than the A19. The idea of a reference is to provide a very high standard set of equipment that should just get on with their respective jobs and not hamper the equipment on test.

FennerMachine's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 05/02/2011 - 22:51
Posts: 566
RE: If WHF use several different

spiny norman wrote:

FennerMachine wrote:
If WHF use several different systems then do they use the 'reference system' for that – a reference point – and then try other equipment also to see how it performs under various circumstances?

LOL!!!

davedotco's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 8 min ago
Joined: 24/04/2013 - 10:02
Posts: 3092
RE: If WHF use several different

FennerMachine wrote:
If WHF use several different systems then do they use the 'reference system' for that – a reference point – and then try other equipment also to see how it performs under various circumstances?

Check out this for a basic description of how WHF do what they do.

http://www.whathifi.com/how-we-test

It is my understanding that different systems are used but the reference system is just that, a point of reference. I have been told that all hi-fi reviews are done in a group context and that the published results reflect this.

I may not agree with their results but I think WHF are to be commended on their systematic and consistent approach, considering the number of components that they have to deal with.

 

altruistic.lemon's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 weeks 5 days ago
Joined: 25/07/2011 - 09:18
Posts: 1865
RE: Tannoy Precision 6.2 review

Good to see you finally coming round to accepting the point of having a reference system, ddc :cheers:

davedotco's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 8 min ago
Joined: 24/04/2013 - 10:02
Posts: 3092
RE: Tannoy Precision 6.2 review

altruistic.lemon wrote:

Good to see you finally coming round to accepting the point of having a reference system, ddc :cheers:

Mmmmmmm...... not quite sure how you got that from what what I said...... :?

I commend WHF for their consistent and methodical approach not for their use of 'reference systems' or for that matter their heavily treated rooms.

I think both these factors skew their test results and do not transfer all that well to results in the real world.

That said, WHF is a comercial operation and as such does a pretty good job, it is not entirely their fault that some enthusiasts consider their views to be 'ex cathedra' and rely on them far too much.

ISAC69's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 18 hours ago
Joined: 13/03/2012 - 17:55
Posts: 684
RE: Tannoy Precision 6.2 review

I think WHF has to match the reference system value to the speaker cost to get  reliable results . There is no logic to check this Tannoy speakers  for example with a very expensive High-End system  because no one will buy speaker that cost 1700 pound for a system that cost many times more .

Hi Fi : Proac Studio 140MK2 > Rotel RC 1580 > Rotel RB 1582 > Rotel RCD 1520 > B&W P7 >Tellurium Q & WireWorld cables   

 

altruistic.lemon's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 weeks 5 days ago
Joined: 25/07/2011 - 09:18
Posts: 1865
RE: Tannoy Precision 6.2 review

Not so. It gives you an idea how good the speaker can be.

Pages

Log in or register to post comments