35 posts / 0 new
Last post
BigH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 17 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 29/12/2012 - 12:31
Posts: 3518
Reviews

I'm fairly new to this site but I was surprised that WHF has not reviewed any ArCam or Creek amps in the last few years, any reason for this, is it to do with advertising?

Alec's picture
Offline
Last seen: 17 hours 39 min ago
Joined: 08/10/2007 - 21:06
Posts: 6050
RE: Reviews

Oh dear God.

Yes. Yes it most definitely is, and a representative of the mag will be along shortly to confirm that yes, it's all to do with the advertising.

gel's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 56 min ago
Joined: 22/11/2008 - 19:22
Posts: 12840
RE: Reviews

Alec wrote:

Oh dear God.

Yes. Yes it most definitely is, and a representative of the mag will be along shortly to confirm that yes, it's all to do with the advertising.

 

Smile

Home cinema system: Panasonic 50VT65 (THX calibrated), Pioneer Bdp-lx71, Pioneer Vsx-lx70, B&W FPM Series, B&W PV1.

Gadgets: iPad 4 and iPhone 4s.  Headphones: B&O H6.  Dab radio: Roberts Dreamtime.

 

Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 30/05/2007 - 12:34
Posts: 28837
RE: Reviews

Alec wrote:
Oh dear God.

Yes. Yes it most definitely is, and a representative of the mag will be along shortly to confirm that yes, it's all to do with the advertising.

Or just that the lead first test in our next issue will be the Arcam FMJ A19 amplifier.

Charlie Jefferson's picture
Offline
Last seen: 17 hours 31 min ago
Joined: 02/09/2007 - 23:49
Posts: 1842
RE: Reviews

BigH wrote:

I'm fairly new to this site but I was surprised that WHF has not reviewed any ArCam or Creek amps in the last few years, any reason for this, is it to do with advertising?


[EDITED BY MODS - please do not attack other members]

richardw42's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 17 hours ago
Joined: 02/05/2010 - 18:56
Posts: 1916
RE: Reviews

Charlie Jefferson wrote:

BigH wrote:

I'm fairly new to this site but I was surprised that WHF has not reviewed any ArCam or Creek amps in the last few years, any reason for this, is it to do with advertising?

 

[EDITED BY MODS - please do not attack other members]

 

unfriendly. 

Yes or no would do. 

BigH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 17 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 29/12/2012 - 12:31
Posts: 3518
RE: Reviews

[EDITED BY MODS - please do not attack other members] :mad:

 

Thanks welcome to this forum, very clever.

 

  

BigH's picture
Offline
Last seen: 17 hours 45 min ago
Joined: 29/12/2012 - 12:31
Posts: 3518
RE: Reviews

So how do WhatHiFi choose their reviews?

 

 

The_Lhc's picture
Offline
Last seen: 18 hours 49 min ago
Joined: 16/10/2008 - 13:23
Posts: 12864
RE: Reviews

Things get sent to them, they review them.

manicm's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 18 hours ago
Joined: 01/05/2008 - 12:57
Posts: 2693
RE: Reviews

Andrew Everard wrote:

Alec wrote:
Oh dear God.

Yes. Yes it most definitely is, and a representative of the mag will be along shortly to confirm that yes, it's all to do with the advertising.

Or just that the lead first test in our next issue will be the Arcam FMJ A19 amplifier.

Ding ding ding! Could you fill us in on the price   Wink If it sounds anything near my Solo Mini but at twice the power but not the price I may upgrade...

CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 hour 49 min ago
Joined: 21/08/2009 - 18:01
Posts: 12054
RE: Reviews

manicm wrote:

Andrew Everard wrote:

Alec wrote:
Oh dear God.

Yes. Yes it most definitely is, and a representative of the mag will be along shortly to confirm that yes, it's all to do with the advertising.

Or just that the lead first test in our next issue will be the Arcam FMJ A19 amplifier.

Ding ding ding! Could you fill us in on the price   Wink If it sounds anything near my Solo Mini but at twice the power but not the price I may upgrade...

Try this: http://www.whathifi.com/news/exclusive-arcam-unveils-feature-packed-a19-amplifier-and-rblink-bluetooth-receiver

"We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we should let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines."  Nelson Pass

manicm's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 18 hours ago
Joined: 01/05/2008 - 12:57
Posts: 2693
RE: Reviews

BigH wrote:

I'm fairly new to this site but I was surprised that WHF has not reviewed any ArCam or Creek amps in the last few years, any reason for this, is it to do with advertising?

Everything, Arcam don't advertise nearly enough. Except in the Jan WHF issue where, gasp(!), they published a dedicated ad for the A19. That must have caught WHF napping :grin: Then again there's no mention of the rBlink on their website. The seem to have a propensity for self-censorship Smile

manicm's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 18 hours ago
Joined: 01/05/2008 - 12:57
Posts: 2693
RE: Reviews

CnoEvil wrote:

manicm wrote:

Andrew Everard wrote:

Alec wrote:
Oh dear God.

Yes. Yes it most definitely is, and a representative of the mag will be along shortly to confirm that yes, it's all to do with the advertising.

Or just that the lead first test in our next issue will be the Arcam FMJ A19 amplifier.

Ding ding ding! Could you fill us in on the price   Wink If it sounds anything near my Solo Mini but at twice the power but not the price I may upgrade...

Try this: http://www.whathifi.com/news/exclusive-arcam-unveils-feature-packed-a19-amplifier-and-rblink-bluetooth-receiver

Ah, never noticed that.

Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 30/05/2007 - 12:34
Posts: 28837
RE: Reviews

manicm wrote:
BigH wrote:

I'm fairly new to this site but I was surprised that WHF has not reviewed any ArCam or Creek amps in the last few years, any reason for this, is it to do with advertising?

Everything, Arcam don't advertise nearly enough.

Not, of course, that advertising spend, or lack thereof, has anything to do with our review selection policy. Never has, never will.

If you have evidence to the contrary we would, as ever, be amused to hear it...

Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 30/05/2007 - 12:34
Posts: 28837
RE: Reviews

The_Lhc wrote:
Things get sent to them, they review them.

Almost: we decide on the products we'd like to review, we request them, they get sent to us, we review them. On occasion, when a manufacturer or distributor decides it doesn't want to supply a review sample, and we feel it's of sufficient interest to the reader, we will borrow it from a retailer or, in extremis, buy it.

On other occasions, when a manufacturer supplies a product we haven't requested, we may decide not to review it, or not to review it until we have a space we need to fill.

manicm's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 18 hours ago
Joined: 01/05/2008 - 12:57
Posts: 2693
RE: Reviews

Andrew Everard wrote:

manicm wrote:
BigH wrote:

I'm fairly new to this site but I was surprised that WHF has not reviewed any ArCam or Creek amps in the last few years, any reason for this, is it to do with advertising?

Everything, Arcam don't advertise nearly enough.

Not, of course, that advertising spend, or lack thereof, has anything to do with our review selection policy. Never has, never will.

If you have evidence to the contrary we would, as ever, be amused to hear it...

I in no way suggested that, my comment was tongue firmly in cheek to the OP.

Pages

Log in or register to post comments