Have your say & ask the experts!

Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

19 replies [Last post]
adamwillan
adamwillan's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 8

Advice please...

After already spending more money than I will ever admit to my girlfriend on my new amp and speakers, I would really like a CD player but have not got the money to buy the matching CD player from the same range as my amp.

I have got the rotel ra12 amp and the q acoustics 2050i speakers. As I have got a built in dac in the amp the cd player only really needs to be used for transport. It will not be for continuous use as I will mainly be using the spdif output on my laptop but I do still enjoy buying and playing cds which are all currently restricted to car use.

The question is would I be better off buying an old cd player such as the Rotel 965BX for around £50ish on ebay or buy a cheap new player for around £150-200 such as the MARANTZ CD5004, ONKYO C7030 or YAMAHA CDS300? Or do I wait until I can afford a more expensive player?

Thanks in advance

Adam

Sizzers
Sizzers's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Jun 2008
Posts: 1413
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

If you're just looking for a transport and assuming you have a BDP/DVD then plug that in (save yourself a few quid, too).

__________________

Putting out fire with gasoline

 

plastic penguin
plastic penguin's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 12926
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

adamwillan wrote:
Advice please... After already spending more money than I will ever admit to my girlfriend on my new amp and speakers, I would really like a CD player but have not got the money to buy the matching CD player from the same range as my amp. I have got the rotel ra12 amp and the q acoustics 2050i speakers. As I have got a built in dac in the amp the cd player only really needs to be used for transport. It will not be for continuous use as I will mainly be using the spdif output on my laptop but I do still enjoy buying and playing cds which are all currently restricted to car use. The question is would I be better off buying an old cd player such as the Rotel 965BX for around £50ish on ebay or buy a cheap new player for around £150-200 such as the MARANTZ CD5004, ONKYO C7030 or YAMAHA CDS300? Or do I wait until I can afford a more expensive player? Thanks in advance Adam

I would say no to a Rotel 9 series. Don't get me wrong they are wonderful machines, but given they are 15-20 years old, unless its been updated or serviced recently, the reliability issue comes into play. I owned the Rotel RCD 975 and the drawer mechanism broke, so I contacted Rotel an they said the achilles heel of the 975, 965 etc. is they had weak mechanism.

I would take Sizzers advice and use a DVD or Bluray player.

__________________

Leema Pulse MKII-S; Naim CD5i MKII; Denon TU-260L MKII; MA RS6 speakers; Pro-ject Xpression 1; loads of different cables...

 

Formerly known as plastic penguin

MajorFubar
MajorFubar's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Posts: 2348
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

...alternatively, if your primary source is your laptop, you can play CDs direct from that

__________________

Main gear: Mac Mini > HRT Streamer II+ > Marantz PM66 KI > Mission 794

Also cluttering-up the place:

Thorens TD160 no cartridge; Marantz CD63 mkII KI; Technics SL-P777; Cyrus 2 + PSX; Cyrus Tuner; Nakamichi DR-1

Tommy1964
Tommy1964's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 12
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

another vote for using a dvd/blu ray machine. Mine sounds just fine with music cds.

__________________

Q acoustics fanCool

adamwillan
adamwillan's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Oct 2012
Posts: 8
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

 

Thanks for the advice. Unfortunately I haven't got a dvd or BR as do not really watch dvds. I have got a PS3 that I never use but for a number of reasons it wouldnt be a solution mainly because my girlfriend wouldnt/couldnt want to use it (plus it always has to update, its noisy, and have already used both optical ports on my amp for tv and laptop, and would need the tv on to control it).

Using my laptop is an option but I might as well just rip them all as flac if I do that or buy downloads, I dont know why but it feels more worth while buying cds if they are to be played through a cd player. Plus wanted to get a cd separate to go with my first proper stereo amp.

No biggie I am really pleased with what I have got just thought a cheap cd option could finish it off...

 

the record spot
the record spot's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 8002
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

If you're a Led Zep fan, snag the new Blu-Ray audio Celebration Day (as well as the 4CD Blu-Ray / CD / DVD boxset) and get something like the the Panasonic BDT-210 (the forerunner to the current 220) and spin your discs through that.  Trust, the Q's will love you for it.  The Panasonic does a decent job with CD and delivers a great picture.  It'll be fine as a transport, loads quickly, and is a neat fit.  You might land a decent ex-dem one or even NOS.  

__________________

 

Onkyo TX-8050 / Tannoy Revolution DC4 / Marantz SA7001-KI / Apple TV 3 / Sony PS3 320Gb / Denon DVD-3930

matthewpiano
matthewpiano's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 6875
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

Marantz CD63SE.  Cheap, plentiful, reliable and will knock the spots off today's entry level offerings.  You may well find the sound of the CD player's built-in DAC preferable to sending a digital signal to the Rotel, but however you connect it up at least you'll always have a choice depending on which sound you prefer.

__________________

Rega RP3/Elys 2, Roksan K2 CDS, Squeezebox Touch, Denon PMA720AE, Q Acoustics 2020i, Sennhesier HD595, Beyer-Dynamic DT770PRO, Chord Crimson/Chord Rumour 2

 

the record spot
the record spot's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 8002
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

Yep, can't go wrong with the Marantz (or the higher end Denon spinners either, as the Denon DCD-1420 I have just now testifies to).  Top VFM, plenty of them as MP says and price isn't an issue.  Got my CD52 Mk-II SE for about £35 delivered.  Daft money.  

__________________

 

Onkyo TX-8050 / Tannoy Revolution DC4 / Marantz SA7001-KI / Apple TV 3 / Sony PS3 320Gb / Denon DVD-3930

shafesk
shafesk's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Posts: 755
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

matthewpiano wrote:

Marantz CD63SE.  Cheap, plentiful, reliable and will knock the spots off today's entry level offerings.  You may well find the sound of the CD player's built-in DAC preferable to sending a digital signal to the Rotel, but however you connect it up at least you'll always have a choice depending on which sound you prefer.

absolutely agree on this one....please check out the small and humble Marantz CD63 thread http://www.whathifi.com/forum/hi-fi/marantz-cd-63-mk-2-ki-signature-appreciationownerscomplainsopinions-welcome

__________________

Hi-fi:

Denon DNP-720AE network streamer, Mordaunt Short Mezzo 6, Cayin A-55 T, Technics-SLQ210, Denon DP-29F turntable, 540p, Dac-magic, Marantz 5004CD and 6025 Turntable, Mac ,Pure AV interconnects, QED Revelation speaker cables, QED Performance interconnects.

Head-fi:

Akg K702, Grado SR60i, UE Triple-fi, Musical Fidelity X-cans, HRT Music Streamer 2+

MajorFubar
MajorFubar's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Mar 2010
Posts: 2348
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

You're absolutely right shafesk. No magazine whose survival relies on promoting the sales of new gear is ever going to officially say this in their pages, but the real truth is, unless you need HD or streaming capabilities, it will be incredibly difficult to improve on the best mid-range->high-end CD players from the 1990s by spending the same money on something new.

__________________

Main gear: Mac Mini > HRT Streamer II+ > Marantz PM66 KI > Mission 794

Also cluttering-up the place:

Thorens TD160 no cartridge; Marantz CD63 mkII KI; Technics SL-P777; Cyrus 2 + PSX; Cyrus Tuner; Nakamichi DR-1

Ocean37
Ocean37's picture
Offline
Joined: 11 May 2012
Posts: 135
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

plastic penguin]</p> <p>[quote=adamwillan wrote:
Advice please... After already spending more money than I will ever admit to my girlfriend on my new amp and speakers, I would really like a CD player but have not got the money to buy the matching CD player from the same range as my amp. I have got the rotel ra12 amp and the q acoustics 2050i speakers. As I have got a built in dac in the amp the cd player only really needs to be used for transport. It will not be for continuous use as I will mainly be using the spdif output on my laptop but I do still enjoy buying and playing cds which are all currently restricted to car use. The question is would I be better off buying an old cd player such as the Rotel 965BX for around £50ish on ebay or buy a cheap new player for around £150-200 such as the MARANTZ CD5004, ONKYO C7030 or YAMAHA CDS300? Or do I wait until I can afford a more expensive player? Thanks in advance Adam

I would say no to a Rotel 9 series. Don't get me wrong they are wonderful machines, but given they are 15-20 years old, unless its been updated or serviced recently, the reliability issue comes into play. I owned the Rotel RCD 975 and the drawer mechanism broke, so I contacted Rotel an they said the achilles heel of the 975, 965 etc. is they had weak mechanism.

I would take Sizzers advice and use a DVD or Bluray player.

 

I have no idea who you contacted at Rotel, but saying that the Rotel have a weak mechanism is in my opinion false. The Rotel 965 uses the Philips cdm 4 and the 975 the cdm 9. The only thing I can think of is that the rubber elastic and the toothed wheel getting worned out after many years of use.  The mechanism itself is one of the most reliable ever made. 

 

malthus80
malthus80's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 114
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

You could try and pick up one of the lower end arcam dvd players. These have very good transports and can be had relatively cheaply on ebay. My mate did this and it works very well with his dac. Much better than the transport in the arcam cd player he had in fact.  Hope that helps.

__________________

Hi-Fi: Naim CD5x; Naim Flatcap 2x; Naim Nac 122x; Naim Nap 150x; Naim NAC A5; Ipod touch 32 gig; Arcam drDock; Vienna Acoustics Bach.

Home Cinema: Sony 32 v2000; Sony BDP-350; X-Box 360 S; Onkyo 606; Tannoy Arena Lite

malthus80
malthus80's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 Oct 2008
Posts: 114
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

I totally agree with what was said about the cd63 ki above too. Will completely blow away any budget offering available now. Gave my 1500 quid naim a run for its money in some areas!!!!. You wouldnt regret getting one of those amazing machines.

__________________

Hi-Fi: Naim CD5x; Naim Flatcap 2x; Naim Nac 122x; Naim Nap 150x; Naim NAC A5; Ipod touch 32 gig; Arcam drDock; Vienna Acoustics Bach.

Home Cinema: Sony 32 v2000; Sony BDP-350; X-Box 360 S; Onkyo 606; Tannoy Arena Lite

plastic penguin
plastic penguin's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 12926
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

Ocean37]</p> <p>[quote=plastic penguin wrote:

adamwillan wrote:
Advice please... After already spending more money than I will ever admit to my girlfriend on my new amp and speakers, I would really like a CD player but have not got the money to buy the matching CD player from the same range as my amp. I have got the rotel ra12 amp and the q acoustics 2050i speakers. As I have got a built in dac in the amp the cd player only really needs to be used for transport. It will not be for continuous use as I will mainly be using the spdif output on my laptop but I do still enjoy buying and playing cds which are all currently restricted to car use. The question is would I be better off buying an old cd player such as the Rotel 965BX for around £50ish on ebay or buy a cheap new player for around £150-200 such as the MARANTZ CD5004, ONKYO C7030 or YAMAHA CDS300? Or do I wait until I can afford a more expensive player? Thanks in advance Adam

I have no idea who you contacted at Rotel, but saying that the Rotel have a weak mechanism is in my opinion false. The Rotel 965 uses the Philips cdm 4 and the 975 the cdm 9. The only thing I can think of is that the rubber elastic and the toothed wheel getting worned out after many years of use.  The mechanism itself is one of the most reliable ever made. 

 

I spoke to their customer services dept. approx 6 years ago when the drawer mechanism broke on my 975. They said the internals were as good as any (Rotel) model, but the weak point, according to Rotel, was the drawer mechanism.

They advised me to have a listen to the defunct 10 series or look at the newer 06, and by the time I took into account carrige charges + parts and labour, it was more cost effective for me to look at a new machine.

I wouldn't give false information from a manufacturer or belittle any product, so you either take my word for it - or you don't!

__________________

Leema Pulse MKII-S; Naim CD5i MKII; Denon TU-260L MKII; MA RS6 speakers; Pro-ject Xpression 1; loads of different cables...

 

Formerly known as plastic penguin

drummerman
drummerman's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 4174
RE: Old CD player vs cheap New CD player

Following Shafesk's impressions of the CD63KI, it (and other) second hand/older players are 'flavor of the week' here. Nothing wrong with that fundamentally.

It may be good to remember though that if one fails (most will eventually), repairs can be costly if you can't do it yourself. They can last a year, ten years or a month. Luck of the draw and to some extend, courtesy of the previous owner.

Be aware of that and you're fine ... perhaps.

love x

__________________

Pretty ... and pretty proud of it