NAD C326BEE does it need to burn/run in?

It does need a period to 'settle' IMO, although others will probably have different theories. You need to factor in the 326 will sound slightly different to the older model. It'll take a few days before you notice any difference.

Ur not the first, or would u be the last to say this. Countless times on this forum, anyone moving from old amps to the very lastest ones say the very same thing. Bright & forward. welcome to the new world of thin sounding amps.. Only use reviews as a guide. Make sure u always audition at home.

I would suggest you run your amp at low volume for a couple of days that will I am sure be all thats required good luck

10 to 15 minutes is all that's required. Your ears may adjust to the sound - if they don't, take it back and try another amp.

Thanks for your replys folks

I'm hoping that once I give it a chance it will settle down or I'll get used to it. I used to love a forward sound but these days I seem to be favouring warm rich tones.  Which going by the reviews from the press and regular people on the net this is exactly what this amp should be.

I haven't been able to give it anymore use as yet, I have other people I the house who don't always want to hear my music. I will plug my sennheiser's in later and have a couple of hours with it and get  it warmed up.

There are no NAD dearlers close to me so auditioning wasn't really an option, I just thought it would be a safe bet. My old amp was quite possibly sounding a touch soft after 13 years maybe.

Thanks again, I will report back after I have givin it some proper use.

yes mine sounded alot better after 30 hours.   Before burn in it may sound a bit thin.

yes mine sounded alot better after 30 hours.   Before burn in it may sound a bit thin.

It's certainly a bit thin compared to my c320, that was a rich smooth powerhouse. This c326BEE is very full on in comparison. It sounds nothing like the warm bassy side of neutral amp that I've read about. Just had it on for a couple of hours there and I dunno if I'm just listening for faults but the sound is grating on me. 

It's not all bad, vocals and guitars are incredibly clear, but the overall sonic picture sounds a bit sharp and strident. The lowest bass notes don't seem to have the power and definition that I'm used to.

Over the next couple of days if it doesn't improve it's going back unfortunately. Maybe a second hand c350 is what I'll have to look out for.

I don't want to sound negative but I suspect it won't change very much.

on my nad c326 i used the tone controls to up the bass , i know this amp has a reputation for being to bass heavy. i never found it to heavy on bass. but the bass is very fast and tight . when i first got mine i was not sure about it because it sounded a bit hollow out of the box. but with 20 to 30 hours there was more warmth  to the sound. but it might be a system matching problem i had the quad 11L speakers which may be warmer sounding to the b&w 601 s3 which i also used to have. 

I think the only "new" amp I've had of late was the Onkyo TX-8050 and that has a very neutral presentation, so if you're using bright electronics with it, then it'll sound bright, or woolly or whatever.  Depends on the source music too.  In your case, I'd leave the amp on for a day while you're around, not listen to it, and then give it another whirl.  I should make it clear I don't necessarily buy in to the whole "burn-in" thing, a couple of hours tops for me, the rest if maybe you getting used to the new sound of your amp.  

My main amp stock comes from Ebay or Gumtree by and large and it's reaped dividends overt the years (Sansui AU-217 / 717, Sony TA-F630ESD, Harman Kardon HK6850).  Quality has been way above what I'd look to spend, but the usual caveats apply with used and/or vintage gear.

Hi MeanandGreen

I've had a NAD C350 for 10 years, which I'd also describe as powerful, solid sounding, very warm and detailed (which I'm in the midst of upgrading if I can find something I like!). If you end up taking the NAD back, you could try Rotel, they've often been similar to NAD in terms of characteristics i.e. warm, musical, dynamic - have a look at the Rotel RA-10, £350. WhatHiFi gave it their 'Awards 2012 Product of the Year - Stereo amplifiers'.

Thanks

From all the Rotels I've heard they ain't warm. Still own RCD 975 and is a fabulous sounding CDP, but isn't as smotth as the Arcam, which has similar sonic traits to Nad and Creek. 

I heard similar sharp and strident quality when I had one in my system briefly, ran it in for about 150 hours with no real change so I returned it.  I've had a lot of unlistenable amps that I wanted to turn down or simply off and "break in" didn't fix that problem with any of them.  I suspect if you like the older nad sound you'll likely need to search for an SS amp that most people think overly warm these days. 

Been through a bunch of amps myself with a pair of vienna acoustics bach (old model) speakers: harmon kardon 3490, peachtree, marantz pm, nad c326, rega brio-r, yba, pioneer av.  The Harmon Kardon and peachtree are the only two that didn't constantly assault the ears with steely violins, horns with too much bite, and a generally hard, artificial and unnatural treble -- both these amps had a full, warm sound with smooth mids and highs that allowed you to listen happily on and on.

If you want something clearer, faster, and more detailed you might try the pioneer a-30, a-40, a-50 integrateds, as do I find my pioneer av receiver to be very detailed and lively in the treble (none of the murkiness of the hk or peachtree) yet without much of the usual fatigue I associate with that sort of presentation.

I suspect Arcam a18 / a28 might also be a good fit for smoothness & warmth.

Edit: It might also be that your speakers are bright and harsh and need the warmth of a smooth amp to sound natural (I half suspect this may be my problem, too, or all these 'neutral' amps really sound shi%)

also  using silver coated cables wont help with brightness.