Quoting from the Breitling website:
the highest benchmark of precision and reliability
infinitely more accurate tolerances
ten times more accurate
Are you sure Dynamight?
Bedroom: Sonos ZP90, Cyrus DAC XP+, Cyrus X Power, KEF LS50's
Living Room: Linn Majik DS, Marantz UD7006, Arcam AV9/P7, PMC FB1i fronts, TB2i centre, DB1i rears
Indeed, in your opinion. There's no reason why a Breitling should cost £7500. Presumably it is ludicrous too, no? And if it isn't why not? It's the same tired old diatribe. If a manufacturer wants to pitch itself at that market space, and I had a quick look at the Cardas site which produces pricey wires, and on the pages I saw, they make no claim about being "more accurate". But they do sell their wires at a premium price. Good luck to them. People should be free to make their choices, an in informed manner without being ridiculed for doing so.
In your opinion, do you think magazine reviews, such as those from WHFSV, provide consumers with adequate information to make an informed decision?
On the whole, yeah. Don't you?
Cambridge Audio StreamMagic 6 | 751BD | 651A | Diamond 9.1 | Minx Xi | Sonos Play:3
Moderator. mail: john.duncan.whf at the mail of g dot com
Ah, but do the likes of Breitling claim that their watches are more accurate?
Yup. Under the Movement section:
To ensure complete mastery of the quality of its mechanical movements, Breitling built an ultramodern factory on the outskirts of La Chaux-de-Fonds and named Breitling Chronométrie. Moreover, all Breitling's electronic models are equipped with SuperQuartzTM movements that are ten times more accurate than the standard quartz equivalents.
You can take that with a pinch of salt. Quartz oscillates at a fixed frequency, you cannot make it oscillate with more accuracy. Nice watches those Breitlings mind.
Origin Live Aurora Gold+Illustrious Mk2 arm+Zyx R100-02/Stello CDT200+Stello DA220 dac/Tom Evans Groove Anniversary phono amp/Tom Evans Vibe preamp/Linear A power amp/Acoustic Zen Adagios/Chord cables/Oppo 105EU.
Someone is being ridiculed??
Indeed. And even if they could prove measured differences, they'd surely be in region of tens or even hundreds of thousands of a second so no way detectable by a human.
Hang on, why is this sounding familiar...
Sometimes yes, sometimes no. I'd like more technical information than WHF provides, but that's just me. Also, there have been a few reviews that have made me question the validity of the testing.
It depends. Which consumer segment are you talking about, what do you consider to be adequate information for that target market, and what you feel an "informed" decision is.
If you want to target - as is the fun thing to do with the science mob - WHFS&V, then I think their reviews are probably okay for most people, but that's without my foreknowledge (and I assume yours too) of their circulation statistics.
Onkyo TX-NR818 / Tannoy Revolution DC4 (bi-amped)
AVI Laboratory Series CD Player
Me too. Like the ones where they say Cyrus amps are great. But then I listen and form my own opinion. Each to their own...
Oh they have been DM, they have been.
And indeed, whether buying an expensive watch, ring, or whatever might well be ludicrous, but it might not. It depends on who's buying, so why it comes down to only cables that are "ludicrous" when for most folk a £40 Sekonda, £200 Seiko or £400 Mondaine would tick all the boxes in terms of telling the time, or a £100 white gold ring instead of their pricier equivalents, get all the attention when precisely the same arguments can be pointed at fancy jewellery or timepieces I have no idea. I suspect many axe gets well ground when the pages of a hifi magazine gets opened however...
People should be free to make their choices, an in informed manner without being ridiculed for doing so.
Do you think it would benefit their readership, if WHF ran the odd blind test of products that have no proven benefit?
You're too late mate; I knew all about IDC's tests page ages ago and the St. Andrews Uni test page before that. Personally, I couldn't care less. I use a £3 coax cable, a £30 interconnect, a £200 pair of Atlas Navigators, a £8 optical cable, a £10 Tesco HDMI cable and a £30 Hitachi HDMI cable. So shoot me.
Like the very one this thread was started to discuss, you mean?
I should have said blind "ABX" tests, which is of course what I meant, JD
It might do ............ but hang on, how do you know they have no proven benefit unless you have already tested them??
© 2013 Haymarket Publishing