Have your say & ask the experts!

Looking for alternatives to B&W CM1 and im a bit lost in this world!

5 replies [Last post]
shaihulud
shaihulud's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Nov 2012
Posts: 7

Hi I was listening to some Dali speakers and some b&w, and fell in love with the CM1. It had a detail to the midrange/treable that i just loved!I am looking for a solution with small speakers and a subwoofer, so I don´t have much interest of how deep or powerfull the bass is.I would be happy to buy the CM1...if they were´nt that expensive Sad but now when I have heard that sound i cannot settle for anything less :)So im on the hunt for used speakers but I understand it would take time to find those on sale here in Sweden since the market isn´t that big (wer´re not so many living over here hehe)So im asking if there are any other speakers that have similar quality to the sound as these have? I guess this "quality" im looking for is rather a feature, a feature of very detailed treable - a speaker that might not have the most dynamic, warm sound (which the subwoofer will help to provide)Or maybe there are other speakers that will even suit me better?

Im not a experienced HIFI user (mostly headphone listener) But i do hear a great deal of difference from speaker to speaker so i really do need some help form more you guys how has some more knowledge puzzled

Chaloff
Chaloff's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Nov 2011
Posts: 72
RE: Looking for alternatives to B&W CM1

Hi shaihulud,

First of all I can say that the CM1’s do have powerful bass Smile. Not too deep, but punchy. The most powerful you can get for the money. All IMHO. This is why I stopped at this model after having listened to about 10 budget bookshelf speakers and about 20 pairs priced around the CM’s. What I can say from this experience is that if you do not care about the bass (powerful or deep) there are many good and excellent speakers of price lower than the CM’s. And you do not care Smile .

I am not sure it is good idea to advise some speakers. My understanding is that when people advise they often:

1) Using just emotional adjectives

2) Using wrong words

3) Are not understood correctly even if they use right words

4) Do not take into consideration acoustic environment

5) Forget level of setup (cd/amp/chords)

Let’s take your case. You compare Dali and CM’s. If I get it right CM’s have much better “detail to the midrange/treable”, the case why you fell in love with them. For me it is a real surprise. Before my B&W I had Dali Zenzor 5 floorstanders. For me they had maybe a little less treble detail than the CM’s, but they had much better detail in the midrange. Mind that Zensors are a very budget line. The CM’s sound as if they really lack a lot in the upper mids. Though I chose them because of the punch. This is I think the case of p.2 or p.3 of my list. Or 4?

I can give you an example of p.4. At the beginning of my experience I listened Dynaudio 2/6 in a shop in a very large room with horrible environment.. The Dyns sounded like a pare of plastic $6 computer speakers. Maybe with a little more detail in mid/treble J. Accidently I listened to the same model after two days in a 12m2 room. It was a really good hi-fi with plenty of details in treb/mid/bas, balanced, energetic, etc, etc.

So my advise that you need to listen yourself. And never buy by advise. Just listen by advise and then you decide.

If you like treble and mid details I would recommend the following speakers which are not that expensive as the CM’s:

- PSB Image B6 (considered to be more like HT speakers, but I would not agree)

- Kef Q100 or 300 (I really liked their trebs and mids)

- Paradigm Mini Monitor (Be careful – too many trebs, and they are very exaggerated)

- Paradigm Studio 10 (very detailed trebs but balanced throughout)

I would not be surprised if you reject all of them. Still…

Good luck!

 

__________________

1) CA Azur 350 / IconBit - CA DacMagic - NAD 356 - B&W CM1

2) Onkyo CR-N755 - Q Acoustics 2010i

drummerman
drummerman's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 4174
RE: !

The CM range of speakers has more in common with the entry 600 series than the upmarket 800. So if you can do without a little of the fancy packaging,  try those.

regards

__________________

Pretty ... and pretty proud of it

shafesk
shafesk's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Posts: 753
Agree with drummerman here

Agree with drummerman here and I also think the bass is better on the 6 series as well and less of that treble I need ear muffs for too Tongue

__________________

Hi-fi:

Denon DNP-720AE network streamer, Mordaunt Short Mezzo 6, Cayin A-55 T, Technics-SLQ210, Denon DP-29F turntable, 540p, Dac-magic, Marantz 5004CD and 6025 Turntable, Mac ,Pure AV interconnects, QED Revelation speaker cables, QED Performance interconnects.

Head-fi:

Akg K702, Grado SR60i, UE Triple-fi, Musical Fidelity X-cans, HRT Music Streamer 2+

manicm
manicm's picture
Offline
Joined: 1 May 2008
Posts: 2142
RE: Agree with drummerman here

You don't mention the rest of your system, but like others said here if that's what you're looking for I'd suggest you save some pounds and look at the B&W 685. I had one, it's still a class act and IMO unbeatable at the price.

__________________

Arcam Solo Mini/Monitor Audio RX1/Cambridge Audio 751BD/Samsung 37” LCD

hbuus
hbuus's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Jan 2012
Posts: 65
RE: B&W 685

I've listened to the B&W 685 several times and it is very good.

__________________

Cambridge 840A V2 amp, Cambridge 840C CD-player/DAC, 2 x Vincent SP-997 poweramps, Dynaudio Excite x32