Have your say & ask the experts!

IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

104 replies [Last post]
creepy's picture
Offline
Joined: 1 May 2009
Posts: 19

For those who subscribe to the IET (Institute of Engineering and Technology) magazine E & T, will know that the latest issue is an audio special.

One of the sections takes a look at some hifi "myths". They basically have said that there is no evidence that bi-wiring works and that equipment burn-in does not really improve anything either.
Is this simply a bog standard Electronics Engineer not understanding the mysterious art of HiFi design or does the article have a point.

I know I was at a hifi show once and an exhibitor was demonstrating the sonic benefits of buying ever more expensive speaker cables;the only trouble is I could not hear any difference whatsoever.
Are there other myths that we need to be wary of?

 

For those who have access to this magazine I urge you to read this audio special. It contains some great information from Studio recording technology to future hifi technology. There is also an excellent article on Vinyl.

__________________

Craig M.'s picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 2875
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

i think this blog from an engineer should be required reading for anyone thinking of buying a new hifi.  it's a shame most people seem to choose to believe a marketing department over someone who actually knows what they are talking about. banging head against wall help, I`m sinking

__________________

Synology NAS + ATV2 > ADM9RS

chebby's picture
Online
Joined: 2 Jun 2008
Posts: 15382
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

 .

__________________

Marantz M-CR603 • Rega R3 loudspeakers • AirPlay • Apple iPad Mini • Apple iPhone 5 • Apple iMac • Apple AirPort Extreme 802.11N • Humax HDR-Fox T2 • Panasonic TX-L32D25B • Sony BDP-S390

pauln's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Feb 2008
Posts: 439
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

Craig M. wrote:

i think this blog from an engineer should be required reading for anyone thinking of buying a new hifi.  it's a shame most people seem to choose to believe a marketing department over someone who actually knows what they are talking about. banging head against wall help, I`m sinking

Some would rather not face the truth...

__________________

On the road: HP Elitebook 8540w, Sennheiser HD650, Bose Computer Mini Monitors.

Home: Denon DBP-2010, Humax, Panasonic Plasma, Monitor Audio ASB-2, AKG K240 Studio, Audio-GD NFB 12, Audio Pro Addon T8 active monitors, definitely no fancy cables.

Nelly's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Apr 2013
Posts: 87
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

just read that article so as im new to hifi that is the most helpfull article ive ever read.so the expensive stuff  looks cool but does not realy sound that much better its just your brain saying its expensive so it must sound better.i also found this article about how many watts you realy need to power speakers

http://www.sonicsense.com/blog/getting-the-most-out-of-your-equipment/how-many-watts-do-my-speakers-really-need/

__________________

Pete68's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 228
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

Some high end gear sounds better than budget, bi-wiring does have benefits for some speakers but the most important thing is getting the synergy right between componants.

__________________

Enjoy the music!

Nelly's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Apr 2013
Posts: 87
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

but is the price difference to sonic  performance  that huge ?.is it more important to have good speakers as these at the end of the day are where everything ends up playing from

__________________

matt49's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Apr 2013
Posts: 1536
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

Nelly wrote:

just read that article so as im new to hifi that is the most helpfull article ive ever read.so the expensive stuff  looks cool but does not realy sound that much better its just your brain saying its expensive so it must sound better.i also found this article about how many watts you realy need to power speakers

http://www.sonicsense.com/blog/getting-the-most-out-of-your-equipment/how-many-watts-do-my-speakers-really-need/

I read the blog twice, and I get a quite different meaning from it. The author certainly does think that in many cases people have pointlessly spent large amounts of money on hi-fi kit because they've been seduced by marketing, peer pressure, false measurements of the kit's performance etc. But he doesn't say that spending large amounts of money on hi-fi cannot get you better quality sound. His central point, it seems to me, and the one he returns to in his conclusion, is that the measurements provided by manufacturers are in many cases wildly inaccurate and misleading, and that they should be subject to closer scrutiny.

I'd add that anyone who reads this blog as a killer argument for the 'objectivist' party (i.e. those who think that measurement is ultimately all that matters) should re-read this paragraph:

Quote:
THE MODERATES: Just as with politics and religion, it’s not black and white. Some have a foot firmly in both the objective and subjective side of things. Some examples are John Atkinson at Stereophile, John Siau at Benchmark Media, and to some degree, myself. We value objective measurements but also trust our ears and just because we may not hear a difference we accept someone else might. I believe those in the middle are generally the most open minded.

Pete68's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Posts: 228
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

Hi-Fi/music is like art in some respects. What does it for one person might not do it for another...

__________________

Enjoy the music!

BigH's picture
Offline
Joined: 29 Dec 2012
Posts: 3300
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

Nelly wrote:

but is the price difference to sonic  performance  that huge ?.is it more important to have good speakers as these at the end of the day are where everything ends up playing from

 

If what ends up at the speakers is rubbish then no, no matter how good the speakers it won't sound good. You need a decent source, not nec. expensive, some people use Blu-Ray dvd players or laptops, an amp that can amplify and control the speakers. The power of the amp. will depend on room size, sensititivity of speakers and volume level you require. As you spend more there are a lot of diminishing returns. Speakers make the most difference to how the sound sounds.

 

Nelly's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Apr 2013
Posts: 87
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

so realy we should not read reviews and confuse ourself with all the jaron as these test and reviews will be nothing like our home enviroment.so to me it means is that we all have different views on what sounds good so we should just go for what we think is the best sound for us if that means £200 amp/speakers or £2000 amp/speakers.for me i love the sound that my soundcard produces through my active speakers(£70)so i thought if i buy a decent amp which i did(marantzpm6004)and decent speakers(still looking)then the sound would be more amazing.but now im thinking that i might hate the sound even if the system costs alot more.i cannot get home demos and as ive said demo rooms are so different from our real life abodes that this is realy not an option.

__________________

davedotco's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Apr 2013
Posts: 2394
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

First thing you need to do is to define what you are trying to do.

A thoughtful objectivist wants a system that gets him as close as possible to the original recording.

A thoughtful subjectivist wants a system that gets him as close as possible to the original performance.

Not at all the same thing.

__________________

We do so many shows in a row,

And these towns all look the same,

We just pass the time in our hotel room

And wander 'round backstage,

Till the lights come up, and we hear that crowd,

And we remember why we came.

Jackson Browne

CnoEvil's picture
Online
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 11425
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

davedotco wrote:

A thoughtful objectivist wants a system that gets him as close as possible to the original recording.

A thoughtful subjectivist wants a system that gets him as close as possible to the original performance.

Not at all the same thing.

Nicely put.........and the trouble comes when one side says that the other is misguided.

__________________

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."  André Gide

Overdose's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Feb 2008
Posts: 3143
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

davedotco wrote:

First thing you need to do is to define what you are trying to do.

A thoughtful objectivist wants a system that gets him as close as possible to the original recording.

A thoughtful subjectivist wants a system that gets him as close as possible to the original performance.

Not at all the same thing.

I'm not so sure. They should be the same thing, as a good recording should be able to accurately capture a performance, but venue accoustic recording limitations will be tricky to overcome and the sound reproduced on a hifi will only ever be an illusion of a live event, unless your listening room happens to be of the size of the original venue and with a suitable sound system to properly fill that space.

In my opinion, you are always better off going for as accurate a system as is possible, because there are too many other variables that have a much greater effect on what you actually get to hear, like how the recording/mastering was finished, through to room accoustics at home.

I suppose it is possible to reproduce a vocalist for example, seemingly giving a personal performance in your living room, when the recording was done in a studio, as the original 'room' that the recording was taken in, can be removed in the mastering, not so in a 'live' environment.

I also don't believe that subjectivism or objectivism has anything to do with it. In the case of a studio recording, then that original recording sound is desired. If a recording of a live event, then as close as possible to the live event sound is desirable, though much harder to quantify (and create), as the only way to tell after the event, is to listen to the recording. Way too many variables for live events though and only a close facsimilie is possible and perhaps all that is needed, to recreate an effect of atmosphere.

__________________

Mac mini > AVI ADM9Ts

ISAC69's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Mar 2012
Posts: 548
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

Hi

 

I do think that bi-wiring is not more than voodoo , bi-amp is another story put 4 mono blocs or 2 power amp to the spaekers : more power

is more control on the speakers you should find a huge sound  improvement  .

__________________

Hi Fi : Proac Studio 140MK2 - Rotel RC1580 [PRE] - Rotel RB1582 [POWER] -Rotel RCD1520 [CDP]                   Headphones : B&W P7 . Cables : Tellurium Q Black speaker cables-Tellurium Q Ultra Black RCA interconnects-WireWorld Stratus 7 power cords  

AV ( 2.1 channels / Bypass mode )  : YAMAHA RXV767 - INFINITY PRIMUS PS8 sub

 

shafesk's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Sep 2010
Posts: 778
RE: IET, Bi-wiring does not work and other myths

Nelly wrote:

just read that article so as im new to hifi that is the most helpfull article ive ever read.so the expensive stuff  looks cool but does not realy sound that much better its just your brain saying its expensive so it must sound better.i also found this article about how many watts you realy need to power speakers

http://www.sonicsense.com/blog/getting-the-most-out-of-your-equipment/how-many-watts-do-my-speakers-really-need/

hi Nelly, I think you got a wrong idea about what the article was saying. Anyway, its rarely true that the expensive stuff looks cooler but doesn't sound better if you are talking about amplifiers, turntables, speakers...it is debatable to a certain extent when you are talking about dacs or digital sources and cables but even then I've found much more expensive dacs to sound better than entry level ones, mind you, to notice a big improvement with digital sources I have found that you need to spend much more than if you want a big improvement with an analogue source.

Hope this clears stuff out,

Shafin

__________________

Hi-fi:

Denon DNP-720AE network streamer, Mordaunt Short Mezzo 6, Cayin A-55 T, Technics-SLQ210, Denon DP-29F turntable, 540p, Dac-magic, Marantz 5004CD and 6025 Turntable, Mac ,Pure AV interconnects, QED Revelation speaker cables, QED Performance interconnects.

Head-fi:

Akg K702, Grado SR60i, UE Triple-fi, Musical Fidelity X-cans, HRT Music Streamer 2+