Have your say & ask the experts!

Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation placed upon it.

62 replies [Last post]
plastic penguin
plastic penguin's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Apr 2008
Posts: 12913
RE: Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation...

Oh, and early Cambridge amps. Once purchased A5 from Richer Sounds, sounded dreadful. Only kept it two days...

__________________

Leema Pulse MKII-S; Naim CD5i MKII; Denon TU-260L MKII; MA RS6 speakers; Pro-ject Xpression 1; loads of different cables...

 

Formerly known as plastic penguin

the record spot
the record spot's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 7999
RE:

Crocodile wrote:

Discovering first hand that the £250 Onkyo TX-8050 stereo receiver sounded like a £250 stereo receiver rather than the giant-slaying beast it was being hyped up to be.

 

Hyped up to be?  Who hyped it?  Sounds like an excellent bit of kit to me and I've heard plenty.  Your ears might be letting you down.  Or the rest of your system, whatever it is, the 8050 punches well above its weight.  

__________________

 

Onkyo TX-8050 / Tannoy Revolution DC4 / Marantz SA7001-KI / Apple TV 3 / Sony PS3 320Gb / Denon DVD-3930

moon
moon's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Nov 2011
Posts: 871
RE: Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation...

plastic penguin wrote:

Oh, and early Cambridge amps. Once purchased A5 from Richer Sounds, sounded dreadful. Only kept it two days...

well luckily a lots changed since then....

__________________

 

SteveR750
SteveR750's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Mar 2005
Posts: 3064
RE: Hi-Fi that

Azur 640 amp + CDP. Within a week it was replaced by a C352/C541 the latter of which managed to play a couple of discs that the Cambridge didn't. A few years later, Cyrus 8 deja vu.

__________________

JRiver MC17 -> Cambridge Audio DACmagic+ -> Roksan Caspian M2 -> ProAc D18 

OneBoxSystem
OneBoxSystem's picture
Offline
Joined: 10 Jul 2012
Posts: 205
RE: Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation

Arcam rDock.

ATC SCM11.

AKG 240 Mark II headphones.

Audio Technica ATH-M50 headphones.

All interconnect cables over £40.

Wink

Macspur
Macspur's picture
Online
Joined: 3 May 2010
Posts: 1009
RE: Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation

A Linn Intek amp plus Linn Katan speakers with matching stands... bought them after my previous gear had been ruined in a burglery in 92.  So thought I'd take the opportunity with the insurance money to have a marked upgrade... wrong!! sound so flat, dry and lifeless.

Mac

__________________

Accuphase E350 amp, Electrocompaniet EMC1UP CDP, Siltech 25th Classic anniversary 330I  XLR Harbeth Super HL5 on Sound Anchor Quod ELS63 stands, Chord Odessey2 speaker cable.  Grado SR60 headphones.

eggontoast
eggontoast's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Feb 2011
Posts: 1117
Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation placed upon it.

Just a couple off the top of my head Arcam A85, Cyrus Amplifiers, Audio Technica AHT-W1000X, Audiolab m-dac's headphone output, Grado RS-2i, Sennheiser HD-650

__________________

Sonos > M-DAC, Beyerdynamic A1, FiiO E17/E9, HLLY DMK-IV, STAX Lambdas, Denon AH-D5000, Sennheiser HD-600, Beyerdynamic DT770, MCA customs - Magnum V4's, Sennheiser HD-265 linear, Sennheiser CX300-II.

toyota man
toyota man's picture
Offline
Joined: 22 Apr 2009
Posts: 1128
RE: Hi-Fi that has not met t

I bought the mission dad 5 cdp when it came out it was alright but not that good and the I made the mistake of buying the dac5 to go with it thinking ( or not in this case) that this would improve things , all was well I hade an insurance policy mature and I bought a Marantz 17ki sigparty time!

__________________

Musical fidelity M6i Roksan caspian M2 cdp Atc scm 40s Tellurium Q black speaker cable  chord  chamelian xlr graham slee novo sennheiser hd598

jerry klinger
jerry klinger's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Jun 2010
Posts: 246
Meridian

Meridian 500/566 transport/DAC from late 1990s. Sold to get matching Naim CDX for my Naim amps. Loved the Naim too, but I think the Meridian would have had more long-lasting trouble-free satisfaction, and enabled use with later DACs.

Also a pair of Kef Celeste III which were the first 'real' speakers I'd owned back in 1980. Should have kept a lot longer... but unfortunately started reading the magazines.

__________________

Rega RP6/DV20X2L/Naim CD5XS/Flatcap XS/Naim NAT05XS/Pioneer N50/amp ??/Dynaudio 1.8-II

shooter
shooter's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 May 2008
Posts: 2597
RE: cds3 & xps2, pants

Naim CDS3 and XPS2. Sort of done things right with its pace and analog sound but couldnt get near my vinyl rig in terms of pound for pound quality, and the soundstage was flat as a pancake indicating poor and cheap CDP, very disapointing. 

Crocodile
Crocodile's picture
Offline
Joined: 15 Jan 2009
Posts: 583
RE:

the record spot wrote:
Hyped up to be?  Who hyped it?  Sounds like an excellent bit of kit to me and I've heard plenty.  Your ears might be letting you down.  Or the rest of your system, whatever it is, the 8050 punches well above its weight.

You seem to have posted in the wrong thread. This one is entitled "Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation placed upon it". That's why I posted my experience. Really don't need you to tell me I'm wrong thanks. talk to the hand

If you look, I'm sure you can find another thread to further worship at the alter of the Onkyo where you can disagree until your heart's content. hello or goodbye

CnoEvil
CnoEvil's picture
Online
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 8741
RE:

As I said at the start, equipment that has proved disappointing (for a given individual) is subjective and personal and so cannot be wrong (for them at that time).

__________________

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."  André Gide

the record spot
the record spot's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 7999
RE:

Crocodile wrote:

the record spot wrote:
Hyped up to be?  Who hyped it?  Sounds like an excellent bit of kit to me and I've heard plenty.  Your ears might be letting you down.  Or the rest of your system, whatever it is, the 8050 punches well above its weight.

You seem to have posted in the wrong thread. This one is entitled "Hi-Fi that has not met the initial expectation placed upon it". That's why I posted my experience. Really don't need you to tell me I'm wrong thanks. talk to the hand

If you look, I'm sure you can find another thread to further worship at the alter of the Onkyo where you can disagree until your heart's content. hello or goodbye

No, I posted in the right thread thanks and stand by the comments. I probably don't need to be told when I can or can't post a response in a public forum. "Thanks".

__________________

 

Onkyo TX-8050 / Tannoy Revolution DC4 / Marantz SA7001-KI / Apple TV 3 / Sony PS3 320Gb / Denon DVD-3930

the record spot
the record spot's picture
Offline
Joined: 13 Oct 2007
Posts: 7999
RE:

CnoEvil wrote:

As I said at the start, equipment that has proved disappointing (for a given individual) is subjective and personal and so cannot be wrong (for them at that time).

Plainly, but with one exception. Hell, he couldn't even get the RRP right (£400)...still, it simply shows that partnered with the wrong gear, almost anything won't sound at its best.

__________________

 

Onkyo TX-8050 / Tannoy Revolution DC4 / Marantz SA7001-KI / Apple TV 3 / Sony PS3 320Gb / Denon DVD-3930

CnoEvil
CnoEvil's picture
Online
Joined: 21 Aug 2009
Posts: 8741
RE:

the record spot wrote:

CnoEvil wrote:

As I said at the start, equipment that has proved disappointing (for a given individual) is subjective and personal and so cannot be wrong (for them at that time).

...still, it simply shows that partnered with the wrong gear, almost anything won't sound at its best.

Yup, which is why an individual experience is....well.....individual.

__________________

"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again."  André Gide