73 posts / 0 new
Last post
visionary's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 month 1 week ago
Joined: 04/04/2008 - 11:31
Posts: 744
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

fr0g wrote:

I'd buy a streamer like a Squeezebox and listen to the online stream (320 Kb). It's exceedingly good quality. That and many others. The Linn stations are also top-notch.

There are now hundred of stations at high bit-rates. 

And you'd have no "need" to connect to your computer.

(hijacking slightly)

Thanks for that, Fr0g. Spent all evening listening to Linn Jazz and now added it to my favourites

fr0g's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 16 hours ago
Joined: 07/01/2008 - 18:38
Posts: 2943
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

the record spot wrote:

chebby wrote:

You'd better give up now Manic, otherwise you'll have the entire rank & file of [LINK REMOVED - house rules] lining up to 'educate' the living daylights out of you.

 

Not the entire rank and file y'know...

The problem with reality is that not everyone wants to take part. Me either on a Friday night, but that's another story.

Subjectivity is a lovely thing, so long as it doesn't make objective claims (and objectivity is useful so long as it doesn't disregard subjectivity)

Alec's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 8 hours ago
Joined: 08/10/2007 - 21:06
Posts: 6071
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

Overdose wrote:

[Pedantic mode on]

323Kbps is lossy and is not CD quality (1400Kbps), so is not going to be, in any way, better in quality than CD.

 

You're off by 11.2.

ROFL

John Duncan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 08/01/2008 - 17:25
Posts: 23030
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

fr0g wrote:
The problem with reality is that not everyone wants to take part.

Whose reality, yours or mine?

Moderator: john.duncan.whf at gmail dot com

fr0g's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 days 16 hours ago
Joined: 07/01/2008 - 18:38
Posts: 2943
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

John Duncan wrote:

fr0g wrote:
The problem with reality is that not everyone wants to take part.

Whose reality, yours or mine?

 

Pi is Pi whether you like cheese and onion OR salt and vinegar.

Whether it be your reality or mine it will equal C divided by d 

 

chebby's picture
Offline
Last seen: 13 hours 4 min ago
Joined: 02/06/2008 - 09:40
Posts: 16035
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

fr0g wrote:

John Duncan wrote:

fr0g wrote:
The problem with reality is that not everyone wants to take part.

Whose reality, yours or mine?

 

Pi is Pi whether you like cheese and onion OR salt and vinegar.

Whether it be your reality or mine it will equal C divided by d 

 

Is this going to be another of those circular arguments?

"We are currently awaiting the loading of our complement of small lemon-soaked paper napkins for your comfort, refreshment and hygiene during the journey."

John Duncan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 08/01/2008 - 17:25
Posts: 23030
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

So reality is only an objective thing? Or does it only make sense as an individual's subjective experience? For example, red is red, but if you're colour blind, your red is not my red.

I'm not starting a fight btw, I'm just interested...

Moderator: john.duncan.whf at gmail dot com

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 22 hours 30 min ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6328
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

Very good. (re Chebby's joke.)

CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 16 min ago
Joined: 21/08/2009 - 18:01
Posts: 12294
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

John Duncan wrote:
So reality is only an objective thing? Or does it only make sense as an individual's subjective experience? For example, red is red, but if you're colour blind, your red is not my red. I'm not starting a fight btw, I'm just interested...

Ah, but "seeing red" is what causes all the arguments, locked threads and bannings! :shifty:

"We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we should let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines."  Nelson Pass

John Duncan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 08/01/2008 - 17:25
Posts: 23030
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

I suspect it'll be more of a möbius strip, which is topologically the same thing... Smile

Moderator: john.duncan.whf at gmail dot com

CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 16 min ago
Joined: 21/08/2009 - 18:01
Posts: 12294
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

fr0g wrote:

John Duncan wrote:

fr0g wrote:
The problem with reality is that not everyone wants to take part.

Whose reality, yours or mine?

 

Pi is Pi whether you like cheese and onion OR salt and vinegar.

...but it does go on to infinity and beyond ....so I just prefer to eat it!

"We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we should let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines."  Nelson Pass

John Duncan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 33 min ago
Joined: 08/01/2008 - 17:25
Posts: 23030
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

...and how does it taste *to you*?

Moderator: john.duncan.whf at gmail dot com

CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 16 min ago
Joined: 21/08/2009 - 18:01
Posts: 12294
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

John Duncan wrote:
...and how does it taste *to you*?

...better than a Mobius Strip, which is too twisted for my liking! :roll:

"We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we should let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines."  Nelson Pass

shooter's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 months 15 hours ago
Joined: 04/05/2008 - 16:45
Posts: 2714
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

Intersting topic, when i have a bit more time i'll give it a read through  :beer:

Alec's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 day 8 hours ago
Joined: 08/10/2007 - 21:06
Posts: 6071
RE: FM tuner vs. CD sound quality?

John Duncan wrote:
So reality is only an objective thing? Or does it only make sense as an individual's subjective experience? For example, red is red, but if you're colour blind, your red is not my red. I'm not starting a fight btw, I'm just interested...

Or trying to discuss something about which there can be no discussion. fr0g is entirely right. But you prefer whatever you prefer, and may not be able to hear differences, that's fine. It doesn't matter weather the argument is circular or rhombus shaped, it's still absolutely correct and if otherwise perfectly intelligent people can't see it then...

So inceredibly tiresome.

Pages

Log in or register to post comments