Have your say & ask the experts!

Creek - what happened to...

94 replies [Last post]
DIB
DIB's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 May 2009
Posts: 2018
RE: Creek - what happened to...

NHL wrote:

Anyone got hold of the April HiFi Choice edition with the review?

 

Nope not yet, but as a subscriber I'm expecting mine dropping through the letterbox in the next day or two. I'm interested in reading the review, though I'm not in the market for one, I'm more than happy with my 5350 model.

 

Had a look at that link. When the new amp was announced last year it was going to retail at £550 but there has been quite a price hike up to £750. Presumably the new CD/DAC, the 50D, when that eventually appears will be going for the same price.

 

.

__________________

Creek Evolution 5350 amp with Sequel 40 phonostage -  Creek Evolution 2 CDP - Squeezebox Touch 

Pro-Ject 2-Xperience Classic Acryl with 2M Blue

Epos Elan 30s - Van Damme SC & Epiphany Atratus ICs

paulsue38's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Mar 2010
Posts: 167
RE: Creek - what happened to...

My copy of Hi Fi Choice arrived yesterday morning. The Creek amp got an excellent review. It appears to be very neutral, detailed and  well featured. It is also very flexible with modules that can be fitted as extras such as phono, FM and a planned DAC. At the price no negatives reported as such but at only about 50w the lack of power was mentioned as a  possible consideration for some.

This issue also gives a good and very positive review of the new Spendor floorstanders suggestng that they are possibly the best speaker they have ever made?

Best wishes

Paul

__________________

Arcam A38, Marantz Pearl Lite CD , Spendor A3, Rega Planar Ortofon Red

NHL
NHL's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Posts: 530
RE: Creek - what happened to...

Great, was the sound forward or laidback? (Prefer fwd sounding amps myself)

paulsue38's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Mar 2010
Posts: 167
RE: Creek - what happened to...

It seems to suggest it is remarkably neutral, clean and open and musical as well.

Paul

__________________

Arcam A38, Marantz Pearl Lite CD , Spendor A3, Rega Planar Ortofon Red

drummerman's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 4963
RE: Creek - what happened to...

Had a quick look at the internals and it seems like a thoroughly well engineered amplifier with good supply and features. I pair of output devices will limit its capabilities so I'd use this one with sensitive speakers.

There really are some terrific choices around these days, despite some gloom and doom merchants prophecying the decline of 'legacy' hifi. Whilst numbers of these items will never reach those of high street AV systems its good to see that with the help of far eastern assembly Hifi firms (and multi media giants) keep producing these and they probably still outsell true 'actives' by a huge number.

Talking of which, it may be worth remembering that Kef has just released an active around the same price as this creek integrated and it seems highly capable too.

Something for everyone.

regards

__________________

Pretty ... and pretty proud of it

NHL
NHL's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Posts: 530
RE: Creek - what happened to...

The new price seems to be £700.

 

To compare, Audiolab 8000A seems to be £750.

NHL
NHL's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Posts: 530
RE: Creek - what happened to...

The glowing review in HFC would merit a second opinion in WHF. Better than Cyrus 6A was the conclusion, which has been the longstanding champion in WHF.

Ajani's picture
Offline
Joined: 9 Apr 2008
Posts: 780
RE: Creek - what happened to...

NHL wrote:

The glowing review in HFC would merit a second opinion in WHF. Better than Cyrus 6A was the conclusion, which has been the longstanding champion in WHF.

That highlights one of the issues I've generally had with HiFi mags: Too often they fail to review prods raved about in competitors' mags.

 

Both of the previous iterations of the Evolution were highly acclaimed by HFC, but if I'm not mistaken, neither was reviewed by WHF. Yes, I understand that just because HFC reviews a prod doesn't mean WHF must do the same, but when a product is an award winner in another mag, I really think every possible effort should be made to compare it to your own award winners!

 

No more calls to Creek to request review samples, I think the WHF team need to approach Mike Creek in a back alley with cricket bats, and convince him of the need to provide a review sample.

__________________

M-Audio USB Transit->Benchmark DAC1->Beyerdynamic DT880 (600 ohm) / AKG K701

drummerman's picture
Offline
Joined: 18 Jan 2008
Posts: 4963
RE: Creek - what happened to...

Ajani wrote:

 

No more calls to Creek to request review samples, I think the WHF team need to approach Mike Creek in a back alley with cricket bats, and convince him of the need to provide a review sample.

Can I watch please?

regards

__________________

Pretty ... and pretty proud of it

NHL
NHL's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Posts: 530
RE: Creek - what happened to...

Ajani wrote:

NHL wrote:

The glowing review in HFC would merit a second opinion in WHF. Better than Cyrus 6A was the conclusion, which has been the longstanding champion in WHF.

That highlights one of the issues I've generally had with HiFi mags: Too often they fail to review prods raved about in competitors' mags.

 

Both of the previous iterations of the Evolution were highly acclaimed by HFC, but if I'm not mistaken, neither was reviewed by WHF. Yes, I understand that just because HFC reviews a prod doesn't mean WHF must do the same, but when a product is an award winner in another mag, I really think every possible effort should be made to compare it to your own award winners!

So, what is the issue, then? A British magazine not reviewing a British product, but why?

Ajani's picture
Offline
Joined: 9 Apr 2008
Posts: 780
RE: Creek - what happened to...

drummerman wrote:

Ajani wrote:

 

No more calls to Creek to request review samples, I think the WHF team need to approach Mike Creek in a back alley with cricket bats, and convince him of the need to provide a review sample.

Can I watch please?

regards

I suspect that it's bad form to have witnesses to such aggressive negotiations.

__________________

M-Audio USB Transit->Benchmark DAC1->Beyerdynamic DT880 (600 ohm) / AKG K701

Ajani's picture
Offline
Joined: 9 Apr 2008
Posts: 780
RE: Creek - what happened to...

NHL wrote:

Ajani wrote:

NHL wrote:

The glowing review in HFC would merit a second opinion in WHF. Better than Cyrus 6A was the conclusion, which has been the longstanding champion in WHF.

That highlights one of the issues I've generally had with HiFi mags: Too often they fail to review prods raved about in competitors' mags.

 

Both of the previous iterations of the Evolution were highly acclaimed by HFC, but if I'm not mistaken, neither was reviewed by WHF. Yes, I understand that just because HFC reviews a prod doesn't mean WHF must do the same, but when a product is an award winner in another mag, I really think every possible effort should be made to compare it to your own award winners!

So, what is the issue, then? A British magazine not reviewing a British product, but why?

I have no idea why it should be so difficult to get a sample of a fairly popular British integrated amp. If the Creek was some exotic product from across the ocean, I could see the issue. Or if it had mostly negative or just mediocre reviews then I could understand ignoring it. I would think that as the mag approaches awards time they would make every effort to hear all the top contenders (which should include previous award winners in other mags). 

__________________

M-Audio USB Transit->Benchmark DAC1->Beyerdynamic DT880 (600 ohm) / AKG K701

BigH's picture
Offline
Joined: 29 Dec 2012
Posts: 3301
RE: Creek - what happened to...

I find the review selection a bit unbalanced there are loads of int. ams from one manufacturer say Cyrus, Marantz, Rotel and then none for say Creek, Audiolab and until last month Arcam. I understand some man. don't want to send their gear in for reviews for various reasons but it does leave a rather unbalanced selection for readers to choose from. If they are ot sent in gear then they have to buy it and then resell at a loss, so it costs money.

Cypher's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Jun 2007
Posts: 1308
RE: Creek - what happened to...

I just read the review in HFC. What Hifi need to review this one...............nowWink

NHL
NHL's picture
Offline
Joined: 12 Nov 2009
Posts: 530
RE: Creek - what happened to...

No chin wagging from WHF on this topic.