27 posts / 0 new
Last post
sonic21's picture
Offline
Last seen: 22 hours 3 min ago
Joined: 23/10/2013 - 10:09
Posts: 27
bi-amping

hi guys,

im a newbie in this forum, am gald to be in this wonderful forum!

i will be bi-amping my speakers, so getting an additional power amp soon. read an article on this website http://sound.westhost.com/bi-amp.htm#summary

quote:<"There is one area where you may find that changing to a biamped system cases an apparent loss of bass response. This is rare, but in some cases the cabinet design may have been optimised for the woofer, including the resistance of the series inductor in the passive crossover. This is especially true for very well designed ported boxes. The result is that a biamped system is slightly over-damped by comparison, resulting in a loss of bass response.">

now im worried if the issue of loss of bass response will occur in my case. im using roksan kandy k2 intergrated amp with b&w 684 speakers. will add the kandy k2 power amp which will drive the LF. i have ordered the power amp which will be arriving hopefully by end of the month. i could not audition it cause there is no demo set at my local dealer.  the other thing i read in another article that i need an electronic crossover or not it wouldnt be real biamping? i thought it would be just a simple connection were from the intergated amp to the HF speaker terminal would use 1 speaker cable and from the power amp to the LF speaker terminal would use 1 speaker cable. for the interconnects from intergrated amp's pre out to the power amp's input. that's it... my question is would i have loss of bass? do i need an electronic crossover? what other setups i have to do besides the above mentioned? sorry if my explanation is not clear. be grateful if anybody could answer me.

hifi room: project rpm 9.1, sumiko blue point no.2, project box II phono amp, project speedbox II se, roksan kandy k2 cd player, kandy k2  integrated amp, kandy k2 power amp, musical fidelity m1 dac,  sonus faber venere 3.0.

abacus's picture
Offline
Last seen: 7 hours 27 min ago
Joined: 24/09/2008 - 23:16
Posts: 485
RE: bi-amping

If your speaker has links on the back (Connecting the bass & treble together) then it is designed for bi-amping (Just remember to remove the links)  so go ahead.

It’s probable that more control of the bass will occur when bi-amping , however this will not decrease the bass just give you a more controlled bass.

The only time you would need an electronic crossover is if you removed the crossover in the speaker itself.

Hope this helps

Bill

Crossie's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 weeks 1 day ago
Joined: 04/08/2009 - 13:08
Posts: 558
RE: bi-amping

+1 what Bill said.

sonic21's picture
Offline
Last seen: 22 hours 3 min ago
Joined: 23/10/2013 - 10:09
Posts: 27
RE: bi-amping

abacus wrote:

If your speaker has links on the back (Connecting the bass & treble together) then it is designed for bi-amping (Just remember to remove the links)  so go ahead.

It’s probable that more control of the bass will occur when bi-amping , however this will not decrease the bass just give you a more controlled bass.

The only time you would need an electronic crossover is if you removed the crossover in the speaker itself.

Hope this helps

Bill

what a relief! yes i will be removing the links/jumpers. thanks for your help Bill. great forum with fast response. 

hifi room: project rpm 9.1, sumiko blue point no.2, project box II phono amp, project speedbox II se, roksan kandy k2 cd player, kandy k2  intergrated amp, kandy k2 power amp, musical fidelity m1 dac,  sonus faber venere 3.0.

Aled Clayton's picture
Offline
Last seen: 10 months 4 weeks ago
Joined: 05/04/2010 - 18:37
Posts: 16
I also found biamping gives a

I also found biamping gives a dramatic improvement in dynamics and soundstage- as each amp has less load, the burden is shared.

does make an amazing difference, at least with my setup which is fairly low cost.

Singslinger's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 4 days ago
Joined: 31/07/2010 - 07:42
Posts: 689
RE: I also found biamping gives a

Aled Clayton wrote:
I also found biamping gives a dramatic improvement in dynamics and soundstage- as each amp has less load, the burden is shared. does make an amazing difference, at least with my setup which is fairly low cost.

Yes me too. I'm running a biamped system as well and have found a vast improvement in clarity, punch and dynamics.

Big Chris's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 months 2 weeks ago
Joined: 03/04/2008 - 10:03
Posts: 5552
All I can do is echo the

All I can do is echo the comments above.

Bi-amping made a marked improvement for me.

davedotco's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 10 hours ago
Joined: 24/04/2013 - 10:02
Posts: 3311
RE: All I can do is echo the

I am totally in the other camp.

I can understand the appeal of just adding a power amplifier to an existing setup, looks like a simple and effective upgrade but I have never really found it value for money.

This is particularly true where the existing amps are of modest quality, so although it is a lot more upheaval, my view is just buy a better amplifier.

sonic21's picture
Offline
Last seen: 22 hours 3 min ago
Joined: 23/10/2013 - 10:09
Posts: 27
RE: bi-amping

i hope for the dramatic change to as ive read a few articles and its worth it. offcourse different people have different opinons and i respect that. i got this power amp at a good offer and buying a new better amp would cost more, over my budget. besides i still love this roksan amp cause its easy to match and its all-rounder. i listen to many genre's of music.

tks for giving me the positive comments guys! looking forward to bi-amping.

hifi room: project rpm 9.1, sumiko blue point no.2, project box II phono amp, project speedbox II se, roksan kandy k2 cd player, kandy k2  intergrated amp, kandy k2 power amp, musical fidelity m1 dac,  sonus faber venere 3.0.

RobinKidderminster's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 hours 49 min ago
Joined: 27/05/2009 - 14:24
Posts: 2521
RE: bi-amping

I found biamping of no benefit. My system. My room. Most importantly my ears. So ....... unless u are me, I would ignore my post.  Smile

Yamaha V2065. MS Mezzo 5.1 Panasonic 42. Sony BD. Garrard 86SB. WD Live TV. SkyHD.

http://www.whathifi.com/forum/home-cinema/lounge-hc-signature-update-bass-traps

 

hammill's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 9 hours ago
Joined: 20/03/2008 - 11:46
Posts: 2460
RE: All I can do is echo the

davedotco wrote:

I am totally in the other camp.

I can understand the appeal of just adding a power amplifier to an existing setup, looks like a simple and effective upgrade but I have never really found it value for money.

This is particularly true where the existing amps are of modest quality, so although it is a lot more upheaval, my view is just buy a better amplifier.

Like Big Chris I have an Onkyo 875, which enables you to Bi-amp the front speakers at no extra cost (apart from a bit of cable). I did this on the advice of the sainted Mr Everard and I thought it sounded better. You may well be right that if you have to buy another amp it is not cost effective.

RobinKidderminster's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 hours 49 min ago
Joined: 27/05/2009 - 14:24
Posts: 2521
RE: bi-amping

RobinKidderminster wrote:

I found biamping of no benefit. My system. My room. Most importantly my ears. So ....... unless u are me, I would ignore my post.  Smile

As a slight aside - maybe my biamping 'negative' impression was partly to do with the av receiver too. Biamping a stereo amp may be an entirely different game of marbles?

Yamaha V2065. MS Mezzo 5.1 Panasonic 42. Sony BD. Garrard 86SB. WD Live TV. SkyHD.

http://www.whathifi.com/forum/home-cinema/lounge-hc-signature-update-bass-traps

 

davedotco's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 10 hours ago
Joined: 24/04/2013 - 10:02
Posts: 3311
RE: bi-amping

RobinKidderminster wrote:

RobinKidderminster wrote:

I found biamping of no benefit. My system. My room. Most importantly my ears. So ....... unless u are me, I would ignore my post.  Smile

As a slight aside - maybe my biamping 'negative' impression was partly to do with the av receiver too. Biamping a stereo amp may be an entirely different game of marbles?

Er, no its not. 

You may get a slight improvement, though in many cases not but in any case it does not come close to justifying the cost. This is of course my opinion and other views are available but I have done this dem many dozens of times and stuggled to make the change worthwhile.

 

The A/V reciever point is an interesting one. The idea that, in a 2 channel system you get the extra channels (to bi-amp) for free is a fallacy. 

In all one box recievers that I have seen the power amplifiers all share the same power supply and in some cases (though not all) not a particularly potent one. Splitting the power supply in this way could lead to a reduction of power, and more importantly headroom on the amplifiers that are doing the vast bulk of the 'work', ie the bass amplifiers and this could easily negate any advantage gained by bi-amping.

Some interesting experiments to be done there, sometimes I hate not being a dealer anymore........ :wall:

RobinKidderminster's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 hours 49 min ago
Joined: 27/05/2009 - 14:24
Posts: 2521
RE: bi-amping

All in one box receiver? Mine came in one box  Smile Point taken tho - all this confirms.the reason my biamping was not beneficial.

Yamaha V2065. MS Mezzo 5.1 Panasonic 42. Sony BD. Garrard 86SB. WD Live TV. SkyHD.

http://www.whathifi.com/forum/home-cinema/lounge-hc-signature-update-bass-traps

 

El Hefe's picture
Offline
Last seen: 16 hours 56 min ago
Joined: 21/06/2008 - 02:32
Posts: 1012
RE: bi-amping

sonic21,

As far as I can remember, I have always bi-amped my speakers. In fact, I put this as one of the criteria when choosing a pair of new speakers. I personally find that adding a matching power amp gives a big step up in bass control. It is however always being debated whether bi-amp doesgive any improvement.

I do suggest for you to also do a 'reverse' trial. Meaning...hook up the power amp to biamp.....listen to it for a period of time.... its OK if you didnt hear any changes.... then un-hook the power amp and go back to a non-biamp set up and see whether you had 'lost' any musicality from the bi-amp trial period. 

Bottom line...if you benefit from bi-amp...stick to it.... if not ...there is always ebay Smile

 

sonic21's picture
Offline
Last seen: 22 hours 3 min ago
Joined: 23/10/2013 - 10:09
Posts: 27
RE: bi-amping

El Hefe wrote:

sonic21,

As far as I can remember, I have always bi-amped my speakers. In fact, I put this as one of the criteria when choosing a pair of new speakers. I personally find that adding a matching power amp gives a big step up in bass control. It is however always being debated whether bi-amp doesgive any improvement.

I do suggest for you to also do a 'reverse' trial. Meaning...hook up the power amp to biamp.....listen to it for a period of time.... its OK if you didnt hear any changes.... then un-hook the power amp and go back to a non-biamp set up and see whether you had 'lost' any musicality from the bi-amp trial period. 

Bottom line...if you benefit from bi-amp...stick to it.... if not ...there is always ebay Smile

 

i will have that trial, thanks for the idea El Hefe.

hifi room: project rpm 9.1, sumiko blue point no.2, project box II phono amp, project speedbox II se, roksan kandy k2 cd player, kandy k2  intergrated amp, kandy k2 power amp, musical fidelity m1 dac,  sonus faber venere 3.0.

Pages

Log in or register to post comments