Have your say & ask the experts!

10.1 vs 9.1

19 replies [Last post]
ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2566

just compared both.the 9.1 wins for me hands down.they need a powerfull amp to go loud but sound is much more refined I gues. voices are much more natural than on the 10.1

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

potboyslim
potboyslim's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 May 2009
Posts: 820
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

Both are great speakers, but the 9.1's can be had for £100. Is there really a £100 difference in sound between the 2?

__________________

Cyrus 8se & Psx-r -> VDH The First Ultimate -> Bel Canto Pre3 -> Nordost Heimdall -> Mono X's -> Atlas Hyper Bi-Wire -> Proac D1's.

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2566
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

not paying attention to sound..the 9.1 sound MUCH MUCH better refined to me

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

matthewpiano
matthewpiano's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 6885
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

That is interesting. I had been wondering about an upgrade to the 10.1s but think I'll have to listen very carefully now. I really wouldn't want to lose the refinement of the 9.1s. They are terrific little speakers.

__________________

Rega RP3/Elys 2, Roksan K2 CDS, Squeezebox Touch, Denon PMA720AE, Q Acoustics 2020i, Sennhesier HD595, Beyer-Dynamic DT770PRO, Chord Crimson/Chord Rumour 2

 

t.lunnon
t.lunnon's picture
Offline
Joined: 14 Aug 2008
Posts: 33
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

I am glad to hear that I have two new pairs in my loft waiting to be fitted


purchased six months ago just before the 10.1s came out


nice one


 


 


 


to much gear to mention 

xon501
xon501's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Posts: 387
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

Having front port is a great asset to put against the wall, the 10's have rear ports and that could effect refinement if pushed against a corner.

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2566
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

Possible havinf something to do with not being run in the 10.1 but at that shop I kno for a fact that the 9.1 weren't having much use. What bopthers me about the 9 range is that I just cant seem to get sound as high as I would like

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

xon501
xon501's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Posts: 387
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

And why is that I don't have any probs pushing them hard.

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2566
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

there's also a Pioneer A6-j display on mint condition on sale for 250 euros...no box..but 15 day trial period and 2 year warranty...can't make up my mind if I want it.

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

xon501
xon501's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Posts: 387
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

If you like it try it, it is worth trying at that price.

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2566
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1
xon501:
And why is that I don't have any probs pushing them hard.


 


with a 50 watt stereo amp I just dont think they lack the oomph. even with a 80 watt amp I thought the 9.4 and 9.5 also lacked the oomph

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

xon501
xon501's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Posts: 387
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

I never heard them hooked to stereo amps, as i only have the Denon, but both for music and especially for movies they have no problem being driven at 0DB, and never really seem to struggle. I listen mostly to rock music and wouldn't push it that hard only because of neighbors.Tongue Tied, and limit the 0 mark for ballads and lower sounding albums.

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2566
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

stereo amp volume button on 12 O'clock doesnt seem to get high enough...for me though

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

xon501
xon501's picture
Offline
Joined: 3 Oct 2009
Posts: 387
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

Maybe some electric comp issue. Maybe the amp cannot drive the Spks well, 50w is quite on the limit as they are rated at 30-150W

ear
ear's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Aug 2008
Posts: 2566
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

these speakers have very low sensitivity compared to another brands

__________________

Yamaha AX-397 + Yamaha NS-333;

HK 3390 + Tangent Millennium 200;

Cambridge Audio Sr10 +Cambridge audio  S30

crang
crang's picture
Offline
Joined: 17 Feb 2008
Posts: 98
Re: 10.1 vs 9.1

Hi

I am surprised at your comments re driving 9.1s? I have CA 540 ver 2 60 per channel i darnt go past 12 clock they are very efficient . i was wondering myself if worth u/g to 10.1s however you need to give at least 100 hours to burn in fantastic litle speakers.
Also it is worth getting good interconmnects they can make world of difference, my Crimson are great.Dont give up on them.mind you the DacMagic does make the world of didfference , used with CA 540c
Cheers

__________________

Onkyo TX8050  MA BX2s Laptop 500MB USB hard drive IPhone