Have your say & ask the experts!

that's not fair Mr Murdoch

39 replies [Last post]
jcshutts
jcshutts's picture
Offline
Joined: 22 Mar 2008
Posts: 332

I have just cancelled my Sky World subscription, favouring Love Film as an alternative source for my films.  I have kept the Sky HD pack and a couple of the variety packs.

 

I had saved half a dozen films during my subscription period - paid for through the £61 per month fee - and would you believe I now can't watch them.  Even though they are saved on my HDD and even though I have started watching a couple of them, I now cannot access them.  How annoying is that.

chebby
chebby's picture
Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2008
Posts: 13410
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
jcshutts:
£61 per month fee...

...as in £732 per year?!!

My gawd, I never realsed Sky cost THAT much.

__________________

Marantz M-CR603 + AirPlay • Rega R3 loudspeakers • iPhone 5 32GB • iMac • Apple Airport Extreme 802.11n • Apple iPad Mini • Panasonic TX-L32D25B • Sony BDP-S390 • Ruark Audio R1 Deluxe • Humax HDR-Fox T2

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29092
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch

Yep, that's the price for Satellite; no wonder Cable declared war.

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

v1c
v1c's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Feb 2009
Posts: 688
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch

That really does highlight what sky is all about doesn't it ... best thing i ever did was getting rid of SKY.

__________________

Pioneer :- KRP500A, BDP LX55, SCLX-71/

MK Sound :- M7 LCR, M4T rear, KX12 sub/

Chord :- Odyssey 2 LCR, Rumour 2 rear, Cobra  sub, Active Silverplus HDMI x2, Power Chord x4, Chameleon Silverplus/ IR dock

Arcam :- IRDock / Focal Lab :- Spirit One/

Black Rhodium Power Management.

jcshutts
jcshutts's picture
Offline
Joined: 22 Mar 2008
Posts: 332
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch

totally agree. I would have cable if they supplied it in my area.  The problem is Sky have very good HD content compared to freeview.  what do I do!!!

The_Lhc
The_Lhc's picture
Offline
Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 11249
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch

I used to have both when I lived away during the week, cable was MUCH more expensive for the same level of packages, don't know what the situation is now.

__________________

No signature worth mentioning...

professorhat
professorhat's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Dec 2007
Posts: 10269
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
jcshutts:
totally agree. I would have cable if they supplied it in my area.  The problem is Sky have very good HD content compared to freeview.  what do I do!!!

£732 buys an awful lot of Blu-Rays in one year (films and TV shows alike) that you can watch whenever you like.

 

basshead
basshead's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Mar 2009
Posts: 347
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
professorhat:

£732 buys an awful lot of Blu-Rays in one year (films and TV shows alike) that you can watch whenever you like.

 

as long you keep paying the monthly subscription, it's a pretty good scam really 

__________________

dj: 2 x pioneer CDJ1000's. Traktor kontrol X1. acer laptop. Focusrite Saffire 6 usb soundcard. 2 x Technics 1210 Mk2's. Pioneerd DJM800. 2 x Genelec 8040 A's. Genelec 7060 sub. Pioneer HDJ 1000 + Pioneer HDJ 500 headphones.

 

hifi: jvc RS-11L amplifier. B&W 601 s2 speakers.

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29092
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch

No, it's not a scam: it's a subscription, and it's up to the consumer to decide whether or not to take it.

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

laserman16
laserman16's picture
Offline
Joined: 23 Nov 2007
Posts: 2196
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
Andrew Everard:
No, it's not a scam: it's a subscription, and it's up to the consumer to decide whether or not to take it.


At last, sensible logic.

hammill
hammill's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 2099
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
Andrew Everard:
No, it's not a scam: it's a subscription, and it's up to the consumer to decide whether or not to take it.

You are correct. It is surprising however the number of people who don't work out the long term cost of regular payments. I was reading recently that it is common place (particularly for the under thirties) for people to aschew their in house free coffee facilities to go to Starbucks twice a day (which costs about £1000 a year I believe). Makes the awful Mr Murdoch's offerings look like good value.
Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29092
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
hammill:
aschew

Bless you! They probably eschew them, too.

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

The_Lhc
The_Lhc's picture
Offline
Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 11249
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
hammill:

Andrew Everard:
No, it's not a scam: it's a subscription, and it's up to the consumer to decide whether or not to take it.

You are correct. It is surprising however the number of people who don't work out the long term cost of regular payments. I was reading recently that it is common place (particularly for the under thirties) for people to aschew their in house free coffee facilities to go to Starbucks twice a day (which costs about £1000 a year I believe). Makes the awful Mr Murdoch's offerings look like good value.



When I'm out in town on my own (not very often) I like to stop in one of our local coffee shops (not one of the big boys, an independent) and have their flat white and I'm reasonably confident that I couldn't possibly replicate that at home, it's fantastic, it makes the rubbish at home seem like a totally different drink (because that's what it is), so I'm happy to pay the best part of 3 quid for it (it's a large one...). To be honest it's the only time I actually drink coffee, I don't like it usually but that coffee is marvellous.

Sometimes things aren't quite as simple as you might think they are.
__________________

No signature worth mentioning...

hammill
hammill's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Mar 2008
Posts: 2099
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
the_lhc:

hammill:

Andrew Everard:
No, it's not a scam: it's a subscription, and it's up to the consumer to decide whether or not to take it.

You are correct. It is surprising however the number of people who don't work out the long term cost of regular payments. I was reading recently that it is common place (particularly for the under thirties) for people to aschew their in house free coffee facilities to go to Starbucks twice a day (which costs about £1000 a year I believe). Makes the awful Mr Murdoch's offerings look like good value.

When I'm out in town on my own (not very often) I like to stop in one of our local coffee shops (not one of the big boys, an independent) and have their flat white and I'm reasonably confident that I couldn't possibly replicate that at home, it's fantastic, it makes the rubbish at home seem like a totally different drink (because that's what it is), so I'm happy to pay the best part of 3 quid for it (it's a large one...). To be honest it's the only time I actually drink coffee, I don't like it usually but that coffee is marvellous. Sometimes things aren't quite as simple as you might think they are.

So do I, a few times a year and yes they do make good coffee. I also eat at restaurants, but not every day. The point I was making was not about using coffee shops, but about the high expense of any very regular expenditure, that many people fail to notice.
The_Lhc
The_Lhc's picture
Offline
Joined: 16 Oct 2008
Posts: 11249
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
hammill:
The point I was making was not about using coffee shops, but about the high expense of any very regular expenditure, that many people fail to notice.



Fail to notice or really don't care about? Or don't need to care, so what if some people spend a fiver on coffee a day, if they can afford it's up to them, even if they can't afford it it's up to them. It's their money. I've been dirt skint at times in the past but even then if there was a book that I wanted to read I'd find the money to buy it somehow, I'd deny myself everything else but never a book, if it was good enough. Maybe they buy the coffee because it makes them feel good, perhaps it's the only pleasure they get in the day, so it's worth the money.
__________________

No signature worth mentioning...

chebby
chebby's picture
Offline
Joined: 2 Jun 2008
Posts: 13410
Re: that's not fair Mr Murdoch
the_lhc:
When I'm out in town on my own (not very often) I like to stop in one of our local coffee shops (not one of the big boys, an independent) and have their flat white and I'm reasonably confident that I couldn't possibly replicate that at home, it's fantastic, it makes the rubbish at home seem like a totally different drink (because that's what it is), so I'm happy to pay the best part of 3 quid for it (it's a large one...). To be honest it's the only time I actually drink coffee, I don't like it usually but that coffee is marvellous.

Sometimes things aren't quite as simple as you might think they are.

I am in my local Costa (in our branch of Waterstones) with a flat white at least three times a week. If it weren't located in a bookshop I don't think i'd bother. It is a great way to chill out over a book and coffee. (Yes, I do buy many of the books I read there despite being able to get them cheaper on Amazon.)

I work from home, so time and money saved, by not having to commute, funds this indulgence. I currently have £43 on my Costa card and have determined to have 'free' coffees for a month in January.

 

 

__________________

Marantz M-CR603 + AirPlay • Rega R3 loudspeakers • iPhone 5 32GB • iMac • Apple Airport Extreme 802.11n • Apple iPad Mini • Panasonic TX-L32D25B • Sony BDP-S390 • Ruark Audio R1 Deluxe • Humax HDR-Fox T2