376 posts / 0 new
Last post
chebby's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 20 min ago
Joined: 02/06/2008 - 09:40
Posts: 16339
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

Andrew Everard wrote:
But anyway, we're still dining out on the fortune of advertising spend behind the five star review of the AVI ADM9.1 speakers...

And what about all those 5 star, award winning Rega products? Rega have never advertised in any magazines.

"We are currently awaiting the loading of our complement of small lemon-soaked paper napkins for your comfort, refreshment and hygiene during the journey."

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 11 hours ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6395
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

Andrew Everard wrote:

Looked at logically, if a manufacturer is getting poor reviews it makes more sense for it to advertise to ensure its products are before the readers, whereas a company getting non-stop five star reviews doesn't really need to advertise, as the editorial is doing all the work for it. Unless it's very stupid...

 

I don't follow that logic. Not saying it doesn't happen in some cases, but I'd say it's the exception. Surely there's force in what I suggested of strong advertising complementing strong reviews? Examples that spring to mind being Cyrus, Naim, Spendor, QED, Chord. As you'll have seen, I'm not suggesting there's anything sinister in that, but I do think attempts to deny the obvious are more damaging than not.

bigboss's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 35 min ago
Joined: 25/03/2009 - 21:40
Posts: 13241
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

gel wrote:

bigboss wrote:

gel wrote:

bigboss wrote:
My understanding regarding blu ray players is plain & simple. If looking for blu ray picture quality, a budget blu ray player is as good as a high end one. Then I won't bother spending on an expensive player. If I'm looking for DVD upscaling, Oppo is the best, followed by Denon & Marantz. If I'm looking for a universal player or a player with twin HDMI outs without considering DVD upscaling, I'll look for cheaper options like Pioneer / Sony / Panasonic (depending on the feature I want). If I'm after superior audio via analogue, I'll look at Oppo 105 / CA 751 / Denon 2012 / Marantz equivalent.

 

It states the Pioneer DVD upscaling is just as good as the Oppo though.  And it states the Oppo is no better at DVD upscaling than budget Blu-ray players.

Not to my eyes.

 

In the review or your experience with the Oppo?

My experience of demoing the Oppo.

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 11 hours ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6395
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

chebby wrote:

Andrew Everard wrote:
But anyway, we're still dining out on the fortune of advertising spend behind the five star review of the AVI ADM9.1 speakers...

And what about all those 5 star, award winning Rega products? Rega have never advertised in any magazines.

 

Yes, as you'll have seen I already mentioned Rega and ATC and said that I'm sure there's many others.

 

On the flipside, what companies are there that get consistently poor reviews (mainly 3 stars, 4 at best say) but advertise heavily?

Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 weeks ago
Joined: 30/05/2007 - 12:34
Posts: 28836
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

BenLaw wrote:
I don't follow that logic..

I'm not saying it's logical: I'm sure there are still manufacturers and distributors as well as cynics and lapdogs who believe there's a link between advertising and editorial. There isn't.

BenLaw wrote:
I'm not suggesting there's anything sinister in that, but I do think attempts to deny the obvious are more damaging than not.

No, you're not suggesting anything in the first half of the sentence that you're not insinuating in the second.

John Duncan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 08/01/2008 - 17:25
Posts: 23071
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

BenLaw wrote:

Andrew Everard wrote:

Looked at logically, if a manufacturer is getting poor reviews it makes more sense for it to advertise to ensure its products are before the readers, whereas a company getting non-stop five star reviews doesn't really need to advertise, as the editorial is doing all the work for it. Unless it's very stupid...

I don't follow that logic. Not saying it doesn't happen in some cases, but I'd say it's the exception. Surely there's force in what I suggested of strong advertising complementing strong reviews? Examples that spring to mind being Cyrus, Naim, Spendor, QED, Chord. As you'll have seen, I'm not suggesting there's anything sinister in that, but I do think attempts to deny the obvious are more damaging than not.

(sigh)

I've seen the relationship between advertising and editorial at WHF.  It basically consists of:

EDITORIAL: OK so this is what's in the magazine this month, in case you want to target your sales pitch

ADVERTISING: What's HDMI?

I generalise, but not too much.

Moderator: john.duncan.whf at gmail dot com
Kit in state of flux

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 11 hours ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6395
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

Andrew Everard wrote:

BenLaw wrote:
I don't follow that logic..

I'm not saying it's logical: I'm sure there are still manufacturers and distributors as well as cynics and lapdogs who believe there's a link between advertising and editorial. There isn't.

BenLaw wrote:
I'm not suggesting there's anything sinister in that, but I do think attempts to deny the obvious are more damaging than not.

No, you're not suggesting anything in the first half of the sentence that you're not insinuating in the second.

 

Perhaps you didn't read my earlier post then. I've not insinuated anything. I set out exactly what I thought and why in my earlier post. I also set out exactly why I didn't think there was anything wrong with it. You may also see that it was in response to a conspiracy theory. 

 

I don't know why you pretend to misunderstand what I was referring to when I referred to your argument not being logical. Perhaps you can come up with a few examples of companies that advertise heavily despite erring consistent three star reviews; none springs to mind. Maybe Sharp for a while. 

John Duncan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 08/01/2008 - 17:25
Posts: 23071
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

Pro-ject, KEF and Arcam are the ones that spring to mine.

EDIT - though 'consistent' is arguable, admittedly.

Moderator: john.duncan.whf at gmail dot com
Kit in state of flux

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 11 hours ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6395
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

John Duncan wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

Andrew Everard wrote:

Looked at logically, if a manufacturer is getting poor reviews it makes more sense for it to advertise to ensure its products are before the readers, whereas a company getting non-stop five star reviews doesn't really need to advertise, as the editorial is doing all the work for it. Unless it's very stupid...

I don't follow that logic. Not saying it doesn't happen in some cases, but I'd say it's the exception. Surely there's force in what I suggested of strong advertising complementing strong reviews? Examples that spring to mind being Cyrus, Naim, Spendor, QED, Chord. As you'll have seen, I'm not suggesting there's anything sinister in that, but I do think attempts to deny the obvious are more damaging than not.

(sigh)

I've seen the relationship between advertising and editorial at WHF.  It basically consists of:

EDITORIAL: OK so this is what's in the magazine this month, in case you want to target your sales pitch

ADVERTISING: What's HDMI?

I generalise, but not too much.

 

Sounds like utter incompetence to me then. I would have thought it's basic stuff to contact a company and say we're featuring a great review of your product in the next mag, would you like to place an advert? If they don't do that they should be replaced. From a conversation I had with a chap from Henleys I'm confident the ad department isn't that incompetent. 

CnoEvil's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 hours 2 min ago
Joined: 21/08/2009 - 18:01
Posts: 12588
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

The_Lhc wrote:

Wouldn't Ireland be easier?

Oi, that's Irishist.  Blum 3

"We should no more let numbers define audio quality than we should let chemical analysis be the arbiter of fine wines."  Nelson Pass

John Duncan's picture
Offline
Last seen: 6 hours 32 min ago
Joined: 08/01/2008 - 17:25
Posts: 23071
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

BenLaw wrote:

Sounds like utter incompetence to me then. I would have thought it's basic stuff to contact a company and say we're featuring a great review of your product in the next mag, would you like to place an advert?

Except they don't know whether the review will be good or bad, because EDITORIAL don't actually tell ADVERTISING.

Moderator: john.duncan.whf at gmail dot com
Kit in state of flux

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 11 hours ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6395
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

John Duncan wrote:

Pro-ject, KEF and Arcam are the ones that spring to mine.

EDIT - though 'consistent' is arguable, admittedly.

 

I'm not saying there aren't any, just that I think there's fewer examples than of 5 star products from companies with no advertising revenue. This supports my argument re a symbiotic relationship but in no way suggests reviews are based on advertising.

 

Anyway, Pro-ject turntable reviews: 8 5-star, 5 4-star so consistently high. (I know they do more than turntables, which don't do as well but if I search all reviews by brand it doesn't display the star rating, grrr)

 

Kef speakers: 4 5-star incl an award winner, 3 4-star, 2 3-star and 2 2-star, so a mixed bag, but recent excellent reviews.

 

Arcam: not many hifi reviews of late, but rdac and rcube did very well at least initially and my recollection / impression is the av amps got high reviews until after many months the problems couldn't be ignored.

 

 

strapped for cash's picture
Offline
Last seen: 15 hours 48 min ago
Joined: 17/08/2009 - 20:56
Posts: 4552
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

Conspiracy theories aside, isn't the solution the same as always: get an audition?

Anyone considering an upgrade that is remotely interested in sound and picture performance will extensively research their purchase, compile a shortlist, and get out there and demo the kit.

Anyone willing to look at multiple reviews would at the very least shortlist the Oppo. After that, they're on their own.

BenLaw's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 days 11 hours ago
Joined: 21/11/2010 - 20:21
Posts: 6395
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

John Duncan wrote:

BenLaw wrote:

Sounds like utter incompetence to me then. I would have thought it's basic stuff to contact a company and say we're featuring a great review of your product in the next mag, would you like to place an advert?

Except they don't know whether the review will be good or bad, because EDITORIAL don't actually tell ADVERTISING.

 

Fair enough. If that's the case, what I say is overly simplistic, but only ever so slighlty. Surely it's easy to imagine the call to Henley Designs: 'so we've given a WHF award to Audio Technica, two to Roksan, given a five star review to Olive, several to Pro-Ject. Would you like to take out 6 months of insude front covers or failing that some column adverts near the buyer's guide? I'm sure you'll be sending in some new kit in that time and if you keep up your recent high standards then the ads and reviews will give some great exposure.'

 

Is this really so shocking? I don't see how it diminishes the integrity of the mag in any way.

Andrew Everard's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 weeks ago
Joined: 30/05/2007 - 12:34
Posts: 28836
RE: Oppo 103 Blu-ray Player Gets 3 Stars!

BenLaw wrote:
Sounds like utter incompetence to me then. I would have thought it's basic stuff to contact a company and say we're featuring a great review of your product in the next mag, would you like to place an advert? If they don't do that they should be replaced.

To reiterate what John just said... Hardly, given that they – the advertising staff – don't know what products are being reviewed, let alone how well those products have fared, until they see the printed magazine.

Pages

Log in or register to post comments