Have your say & ask the experts!

Blu Ray player startup/loading time compared to Pioneer 51FD

1 reply [Last post]
gregvet
gregvet's picture
Offline
Joined: 24 Dec 2008
Posts: 707

My trusty old Pioneer 51FD seems to be finally giving up the ghost. My OH will allow a new one to be purchased only if it is significantly faster to boot up and load discs that the current one.

 

How much faster are the new players than my relatively ancient one?

How much faster specifically is a Marantz UD7006, as this isnt the newest, but can be got for not too much money now, and appeals as its supposed to be a good player with universal disc support? If I take a punt and its no quicker I may be in the dog house  embarassed

__________________

Bedroom: Sonos ZP90, Cyrus DAC XP+, Cyrus X Power, KEF LS50's

Living Room: Linn Majik DS, Marantz UD7006, Arcam AV9/P7, PMC FB1i fronts, TB2i centre, DB1i rears

bigboss
bigboss's picture
Online
Joined: 25 Mar 2009
Posts: 9383
RE: Blu Ray player startup/loading time compared to Pioneer 51FD

It's a lot faster than the Pioneer, don't worry!  Smile

If you find Denon 2012UD to be cheaper, go for that instead. It's the same player as the Marantz:

http://www.whathifi.com/review/denon-dbp-2012ud

__________________

My Home Cinema  Pioneer KRP 500A, Yamaha RX-V1900, MA Radius R225HD LCR, R90HD rears, AW12 sub, Panasonic BD60, PS3, Boxee Box, Sky HD, Boxee Box, Logitech Harmony One, Logitech PS3 Adapter, Sonos ZP90

Bedroom Samsung UE32C6510, PS3 slim white, Apple TV, Sonos S5, Sonos ZP90, Audioengine 2, Oppo OPDV971H

Miscellaneous: Synology DS212J + 2 X WD Red 2TB drives, WD 1TB NAS, Sonos ZoneBridge, BT HH3 as modem & AirPort Extreme router