5 stars
in the my opinion site of the review of the anthem 700 i notice something that obviously is repeating himself
a memeber was demanding how a receiver who lacked features could receive 5 stars
why not for instance device stars as following
first star = build quality
second star = easy to set up
third star = video and cd quality converting
forth star = sonic performance home theatre and stereo (2.
fifth star = value for money
whats hifi could also decide to give half stars ..so the anthem could receive 4 1/2 stars due to his lack
stars could also be added
for exemple 6 star = future proof
why is this so important ? when you loock on the questions asked some are repeating themself
for example which receiver is good with music ??? it is the same with for exemple speakers packages
i know this item is not a great succes but the last time i hear more and more critisme about the waths hifi review
taken the two latest items
3 stars for the NAD t787 who is seen by all others sites has the best ever heard
and the blue ray oppo 103 who also reveived 3 stars there were a blue ray who has not got a analogue multi channel
output (marantz ud 7007) is getting 5 stars ..
when you are reading the reaction on this last one it should have cost him at least 1 star ...
i don't want to critisize the testers on WHifi but how does this come??