2 posts / 0 new
Last post
onlystyle's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 4 months ago
Joined: 27/10/2012 - 17:34
Posts: 44
5 stars

in the my opinion site of the review of the anthem 700 i notice something that obviously is repeating himself 

a memeber was demanding how a receiver who lacked features could receive 5 stars 

why not for instance device stars as following 

first star = build quality 

second star = easy to set up 

third star = video and cd quality converting 

forth star = sonic performance home theatre and stereo (2.0)

fifth star = value for money 

whats hifi could also decide to give half stars ..so the anthem could receive 4 1/2 stars due to his lack 

stars could also be added 

for exemple 6 star = future proof 

why is this so important ? when you loock on the questions asked some are repeating themself 

for example which receiver is good with music ??? it is the same with for exemple speakers packages 

 

 

onlystyle's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 4 months ago
Joined: 27/10/2012 - 17:34
Posts: 44
RE: 5 stars

i know this item is not a great succes but the last time i hear more and more critisme about the waths hifi review 

taken the two latest items 

3 stars for the NAD t787 who is seen by all others sites has the best ever heard

and the blue ray oppo 103 who also reveived 3 stars there were a blue ray who has not got a analogue multi channel 

output (marantz ud 7007) is getting 5 stars ..

when you are reading the reaction on this last one it should have cost him at least 1 star ...

i don't want to critisize the testers on WHifi but how does this come??

 

 

 

Log in or register to post comments