Ok..first impression was that the HFT supreme fuse really makes a difference to the sound compare to the stock fuse BUT not in a way I like it. Yes it's definitely more detailed and bass really tighten up and more vibrant if its the right word. But the overall presentation became a bit "dry" and loss fluidity and naturalness . Swapped these fuses several times and I heard same results. Its like the fuse version of Black Ravioli isolation pad when I used under the cdp. This will be sent back to the dealer for full refund NOT for the reason I did'nt hear a difference but for the sound which I did'nt like.
Electrocompaniet EMC 1UP(spider clamp) / Musical Fidelity AMS 35i / Focal Electra 1028be / MIT AVt MA speaker cable-Matrix 12 xlr / Chord powerchord / GIK acoustics
This will be sent back to the dealer for full refund NOT for the reason I did'nt hear a difference but for the sound which I did'nt like.
I wonder what happened to the expectation bias / placebo effect?
"Everything has been said before, but since nobody listens we have to keep going back and beginning all over again." André Gide
Expectation bias is believing there will be a difference. Therefore, criteria met.
To be fair Cno..these fuses got some great reviews on the net and many are happy with them. But IMHO thats not the case, these may be system dependent and subjective to the listener. Unfortunately they did'nt work for me and I won't use them even if they will give to me for free;)
IMO. The expectation (if there even was one), was likely to be that the sound would be improved, otherwise what was the point......so criteria not met.
Placebo should have made it sound better, as it was expensive (for a fuse).
It was a facetious remark.........I believe that we are perfectly able to assess the effect of something like this. I reject far more than I go with, yet when I do go with something, I'm told that it's all in my head (apparently not the case when I reject it).
No, it is as I said. The expectation is believing there is a difference. Whether the difference is good or bad doesn't come into it. Plenty of info on the internet if you want to check.
Surely it's when there is a bias towards a result that is expected by the person experimenting......so if that expectation is an improvement in sound, then that's what it is (in that particular case).
Cno, not being harsh, but I think that's called denial. You win some, you lose some, that's life. Luckily in Oz we don't have fuses like here, so it doesn't come into it.
What is wrong with this forum today? Double posts nearly all the time!
I'm not arguing about fuses, but definitions.....
© 2014 Haymarket Publishing