Have your say & ask the experts!

May Issue

24 replies [Last post]
Richard Melville
Richard Melville's picture
Offline
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Posts: 183

The new issue arrives this Thursday - 3rd April. It's a packed issue in which we've rated every UK Blu-ray player and compiled a bumper feature which concerns your next TV.

That's right, we've seen the future and are ready to tell you all about it before you make your next big TV purchase...don't go shopping without it. In other news, we've tested luxury MP3 players, micros, budget headphones and rated a 32in Full HD TV.

Plus, we've rated a TV which can receive films, photos and music directly from your PC - wirelessly. Let us know your thoughts, questions and future requests right here...

timwileman
timwileman's picture
Offline
Joined: 19 Mar 2008
Posts: 1749
Re: May Issue

hi

is the 3rd april date for the shops or subscribers?

 

 

Andrew Everard
Andrew Everard's picture
Online
Joined: 30 May 2007
Posts: 29046
Re: May Issue

 Both.

__________________

Consulting Editor, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision/whathifi.com  Audio Editor, Gramophone

jamesbub
jamesbub's picture
Offline
Joined: 21 Feb 2008
Posts: 28
Re: May Issue

Have just recieved my May copy. O dear, ALL THE TEXT IS BLURRED, PICS MISSING, TEXT MISTYPED, MIS SPELT

DOES ANYONE PROOF READ IT BEFORE GOING OUT?

IT'S GETTTING THAT BAD I'M CONSIDERING CANCELLING WHAT USED TO BE A VERY GOOD MAG.

THE QUALITY HAS GONE DOWNHILL RECENTLY I GUESS YOUR TRYING TO SAVE MONEY.?

__________________

seduct10n
seduct10n's picture
Offline
Joined: 8 Nov 2007
Posts: 156
Re: May Issue

It's a very good and useful mag, but there are always mistakes in it......

Prices wrong, spelling mistakes, wrong items against costs etc, but it's funny finding them lol

Jonathan Evans
Jonathan Evans's picture
Offline
Joined: 7 Jan 2008
Posts: 202
Re: May Issue

Hi James

You are correct that there are some fairly glaring printing errors in this latest issue.

I hope you believe me when I say that we find these issues as frustrating as you do.

The problem was a font clash between our repro house and the printer, which meant that almost every instance of the Small Caps font we use came out as gobbledegook - although those pages were fine when they left us.

Unfortunately, and embarrassingly for us, this is the font we use whenever we mention the name of the magazine in full. So there are a number of occasions when what looks like an alien alphabet is used. You will also see the same situation on the tabs on the Blu-ray Super Test.

I can only apologise for these, but assure you that they were completely beyond our control.

Any other typos etc will be down to us, of course. We do our utmost to ensure that these do not occur, but I have no doubt that some do slip through the net.

I'm fairly confident when I say that I hate these things happening far more than you do - and rest assured we're doing everything we can to produce as perfect a magazine as possible.

All the best

Jonny

__________________

Jonathan Evans is managing editor of What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision

What, from here?

With these feet?

brock_boogie
brock_boogie's picture
Offline
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 203
Re: May Issue

How can I get my hands on this issue in Canada? We're still waiting for the April edition to hit the shelves!

I'd like to get a copy of the May issue for your CD player & monitor reviews. Can I order from the UK directly?

Cheers!

Gatwick Flyer
Gatwick Flyer's picture
Offline
Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Posts: 134
Re: May Issue

A couple of points from the May issue I noticed apart from the above...

 - Have you stopped listing names on the Q&A advice pages? No names at all on all the queries...

- Page 3 states a 1,000,000 readers or something like that (not got it in front of me) but your circulation figures at the back of the magazine states 59,000. Which is correct?

Apart from these it's been another great issue.

Andy Kerr
Andy Kerr's picture
Offline
Joined: 6 Jun 2007
Posts: 340
Re: May Issue

Hi. We stopped listing readers' names on queries some time ago. In part, that was because we felt it didn't really contribute much to the page (and deleting them meant we could use the space taken up for longer or more answers), but it was also because we increasingly receive queries via the forum, and we found that many forum user names are either too long or too obscure to make sense in print.

As to the circulation question: 59,000 refers to the audited circulation figure for the magazine in the UK. However, What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision sells globally, with bespoke, translated versions on sale in France, Spain, India, Russia, South Africa, Ukraine and more. Our international readership enables us to claim the 1,000,000 figure.

__________________

Editor of the What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision Ultimate Guides

Thaiman
Thaiman's picture
Offline
Joined: 28 Jul 2007
Posts: 4228
Re: May Issue

user="Andy Kerr" wrote:
Our international readership enables us to claim the 1,000,000 figure.

phenomenal! Surprise

Well Done

 

__________________

 

TW Raven AC - Soundsmith SG-410 - MSB 202 - Gershman Acoustics Black Swan - Audioquest K9

 

Clare Newsome
Clare Newsome's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jun 2007
Posts: 13733
Re: May Issue

And there's more global expansion to come, too.... Hope to bring you some exciting news soon.

Add in the website, which is going great-guns - already hundreds of thousands of unique users every month, and millions of page impressions - and no wonder we're so busy! 

__________________

Group PR Manager - Computers Unlimited;

Former Group Editor of What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision and Whathifi.com

Twitter: @ClareNewsome

Gatwick Flyer
Gatwick Flyer's picture
Offline
Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Posts: 134
Re: May Issue

Thanks Andy for the reply.

Hadn't honestly noticed the names disappearing before this month's issue.

On an international front I'd love to see WHFS&V rubbing shoulders with the US big boys when I'm out in the States...any chances in the future?

jules153
jules153's picture
Offline
Joined: 29 Jun 2007
Posts: 459
Re: May Issue

Who's picture is on the front cover?

I say this because usually the piccy is a still from a film or TV programme, whereas this months cover pic looks like something you'd find on the cover of Womas Own...

Smile

jules.

Clare Newsome
Clare Newsome's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jun 2007
Posts: 13733
Re: May Issue

user="jules153" wrote:
Who's picture is on the front cover?

I say this because usually the piccy is a still from a film or TV programme, whereas this months cover pic looks like something you'd find on the cover of Womas Own...

Smile

jules.

It's the lovely Eva Longoria (or is that Eva Longoria-Parker these days?) from Desparate Housewives, back on TV this month. We won't comment on what our wonderful printers did to the image... Angry

__________________

Group PR Manager - Computers Unlimited;

Former Group Editor of What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision and Whathifi.com

Twitter: @ClareNewsome

Clare Newsome
Clare Newsome's picture
Offline
Joined: 4 Jun 2007
Posts: 13733
Re: May Issue

user="Gatwick Flyer" wrote:

On an international front I'd love to see WHFS&V rubbing shoulders with the US big boys when I'm out in the States...any chances in the future?

Never say never! 

__________________

Group PR Manager - Computers Unlimited;

Former Group Editor of What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision and Whathifi.com

Twitter: @ClareNewsome

Gatwick Flyer
Gatwick Flyer's picture
Offline
Joined: 29 Jan 2008
Posts: 134
Re: May Issue

user="Clare Newsome" wrote:
user="jules153" wrote:
Who's picture is on the front cover?

I say this because usually the piccy is a still from a film or TV programme, whereas this months cover pic looks like something you'd find on the cover of Womas Own...

Smile

jules.

It's the lovely Eva Longoria (or is that Eva Longoria-Parker these days?) from Desparate Housewives, back on TV this month. We won't comment on what our wonderful printers did to the image... Angry

Talking of images...

For as long as I can recall mags have been using stills from current film/video releases when reporting/testing screens. This doesn't really help someone reading the report/review but just fills the grey/black void. Hasn't technology caught up so that photographers can take a realistic photograph of what images on the screens look like?