EXCLUSIVE REVIEW: LG 42LG6000 Scarlet LCD TV – the red set on test!

There's been a huge amount of interest on our Forums about the new 'Scarlet' range of flatscreen TVs from LG, and we've just had the 42in version in for test for publication in the next issue of the Ultimate Guide to Television, on sale June 5.
Given that many of you are so keen to know how this set performs, we decided to be good to you and bring you the full review online before its publication in print.
So to find out if LG 42LG6000 is as good as it looks, read on...
LG 42LG6000
£880
4 stars
For
Designer looks; excellent connectivity options; creates a super depth of field
Against
Images lack crispness and solidity; struggles with movement during fast action scenes
Verdict
The 42LG6000 delivers a huge dollop of style topped off with a fine sprinkling of substance
Call us strange, but the rear of a TV doesn't usually get our juices flowing. But this isn't the case with the 42LG6000.
Taken from LG's new Scarlet range of LCD TVs, the rear of this 42-incher is covered in a glossy, stylish deep red finish. Even the way the inputs are arranged in a neat cluster looks exquisite.
It's a Full HD, 1080/24fps set equipped with a major arsenal of inputs that include a set of component video inputs, VGA, USB and four HDMI inputs.
Other clever technological highlights include LG's Intelligent Eye system that adjusts the backlight to suit the light levels in your room. LG claims this can reduce energy consumption by up to 60 per cent.
The front of the TV is gloss black and the frame extends below the actual screen to hide speakers tuned by hi-fi specialist Mr Mark Levinson. In the middle of the bottom panel there's a small aperture, whose ring glows scarlet when in standby mode.
The LG gives you ample opportunity to tinker with the picture – there are numerous different picture modes to choose from and customise. Once we'd done that, and hooked up our Pioneer BDP-LX70 Blu-ray player, we popped in the Blu-ray disc of Blood Diamond. The result? The LG serves up a vibrant, punchy on-screen image.
The green, luscious African backdrop is beautifully presented. The set generates an impressive depth of field, especially during the wider, landscape shots. Allowing the LG's internal scaler to handle standard definition sources yields good results too, but we'd like a touch more fine detail and solidity to the overall image.
Despite being a 100Hz design, the set also struggles to handle rapid movement. Off-air performance through the digital tuner is passable, but images do err on the soft side.
It's good to find that sound quality of the specially tuned speakers is well above average. They emit a clear, dynamic sound.
There's no doubt that the LG is stylish, desirable, and it doesn't cost the earth. But, the picture quality on offer isn't quite up to the standard of the class leaders at this size.
TECH SPECS
Type LCD
Aspect Ratio 16:9
HD Ready Yes
Full HD Yes
Screen size (in) 42
Resolution 1920 x 1080
Accepts 1080p Yes
24fps Yes
HDMI 1.3a 4
Integrated analogue tuner Yes
Integrated digital tuner Yes
HDMI in 4
DVI in 0
PC in 1
Component in 1
RGB Scart in 1
Scart in 1
S-Video in 0
Composite in 1
USB in 1
Memory card in 0
Phono audio in 2
Phono audio out 0
Digital audio out 1
Dimensions (hwd, cm) 80 x 104 x 38
Weight (kg) 24
Technorati Tags: 1080i, 1080p, 24fps, 720p, Freeview, Full HD, HDMI , HDTV, high-def, LCD, LCD TV, LG 42LG6000, Mark Levinson, Scarlet TV, USB, VGA
- Andy Clough's blog
- Login to post comments





Comments
@ hifi_nut,
you tell 'em soldier
So let me get this straight ...'Images lack crispness and solidity; struggles with movement during fast action scenes'.....and it gets 4 stars.
I thought a TV is for actually watching pictures on, not looking at the pretty red surround.
Sounds like a rubbish set to me.
How would this or the Samsung 40a656 compare to the Panny range (specifically the 42" PZ80/PZ85)?
Heeeeeeeeeeelp please! The LG is approx 300 quid cheaper than the samy 40a656 and the LG is 42" to samies 40". Is the sammy worth the extra £300 or would i not notice much of a diff between the 2. Sit about 10ft away with a lot of sky hd and blu-ray watched??
Hi Felicia,
I've seen the Samsung for just over £1000 over on Dixons.co.uk, i think it just about merits the extra. You shouldn't miss the extra 2 inches either.
Incidentally, there's a supertest of 37-40in TVs coming up in the August of What Hi-Fi? Sound and Vision that includes that particular Samsung, plus the Sony KDL-40W4000 and Toshiba 40ZF355D.
The "major arsenal of inputs" seems to exclude Scart Sockets ??. Not ideal then for anyone still on Sky or Sky+ and not yet prepared to take the leap to Sky HD. Aimed squarely at the HD User then.
Oops. Just seen on the tech Spec - 2 Scart Ins. Where are they ?
There are inputs on the side of the set as well as the back...
Hi looks great and 4 stars is damn good effort, 42 inch bit big for me though, are you reviewing the 32" or 37" any time soon????
This TV looks absolutely stunning, I think. The best looking TV I have seen. So for that, I think I could accept a slightly less better picture quality than other TV's, such as the latest Panasonic sets, for example. It's not TOO much of a loss, given what you're getting (42", 4 HDMI, style, specs) for the price tag - £840 at one online store.
I have to say, I am really, really, really tempted. I think I'll hang back a couple of weeks though, as I'd like to read a couple of more reviews first, especially from those who have bought and own the TV, as I'd like to know if there are any common faults.
I say that because it seems every LCD TV I've had my eye on, a lot of people come out talking about the same faults. The Samsung 5 and 6 Series being good examples.
Thank you for the review anyway, guys. Much appreciated.
I saw it in the shop last saterday. Let me put it like this, for me it was like meeting a model in real life. Never as good as the photographs.
haychris - we haven't had the 32- or 37in yet, but have got the 32in version of the next model down (the 32LG5000) and will be including a review of that in the Ultimate Guide to TV, out June 5th.
All well and good to make it more energy efficient, but then to add a function that glows in Standby mode is a bit contradictory. Aren't we always being told to turn the tv off when not in use. Surely the temptation to see it glow would be too much